<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You: In 17 Syllables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4747</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4747</guid>
		<description>Sorry, aanthems, but I have to go with Lauren on this one.

You&#039;re looking at the word &quot;opener&quot;, which is not the word &quot;open&quot;. M-W seems to suggest that opener is two syllables (ie, op-ner), and open is also two syllables: op-en.

The M-W Online shows the following:

O-p&amp;n
Op-n&amp;r

See how the syllable-breaking dash moves in the two examples?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, aanthems, but I have to go with Lauren on this one.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re looking at the word &#8220;opener&#8221;, which is not the word &#8220;open&#8221;. M-W seems to suggest that opener is two syllables (ie, op-ner), and open is also two syllables: op-en.</p>
<p>The M-W Online shows the following:</p>
<p>O-p&amp;n<br />
Op-n&amp;r</p>
<p>See how the syllable-breaking dash moves in the two examples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aanthems</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator>aanthems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4739</guid>
		<description>MW indicates their syllables both with a little dash and little dot, like: open·er   or   ad·jec·tive.   They insert no dot for open.  

Then again, I don&#039;t know what Chuck&#039;s talking about but he&#039;s &lt;i&gt;forcing&lt;/i&gt; me to belive it.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MW indicates their syllables both with a little dash and little dot, like: open·er   or   ad·jec·tive.   They insert no dot for open.  </p>
<p>Then again, I don&#8217;t know what Chuck&#8217;s talking about but he&#8217;s <i>forcing</i> me to belive it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4733</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4733</guid>
		<description>Great.  Bring in the linguists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  Bring in the linguists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>Even if you don&#039;t pronounce the schwa (represented by the ampersand in the reply above), I&#039;m afraid the best you&#039;re going to do is say that you have a syllabic [n] in the word -- which still gives it two syllables.

If the [n] wasn&#039;t syllabic at all, you either a) couldn&#039;t pronounce the [p] or b) resume voicing for the [n].  Sorry :-P  That was more of an answer than you wanted.  

Nice quas-hai-ku tho.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you don&#8217;t pronounce the schwa (represented by the ampersand in the reply above), I&#8217;m afraid the best you&#8217;re going to do is say that you have a syllabic [n] in the word &#8212; which still gives it two syllables.</p>
<p>If the [n] wasn&#8217;t syllabic at all, you either a) couldn&#8217;t pronounce the [p] or b) resume voicing for the [n].  Sorry :-P  That was more of an answer than you wanted.  </p>
<p>Nice quas-hai-ku tho.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/03/23/you-in-17-syllables/#comment-4716</guid>
		<description>Open indeed has two syllables.  If you&#039;re violating the haiku rules, that&#039;s one thing, but I as far as I can tell, Merriam-Webster lists open as having two syllables... like this:  
&#039;O-p&amp;n

that little dash - means a syllable break.  :)  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open indeed has two syllables.  If you&#8217;re violating the haiku rules, that&#8217;s one thing, but I as far as I can tell, Merriam-Webster lists open as having two syllables&#8230; like this:<br />
&#8216;O-p&amp;n</p>
<p>that little dash &#8211; means a syllable break.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 04:43:06 -->
