<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Linking and Blogrolls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 06:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>I often use blogrolls to find new blogs I haven&#039;t tried before. I don&#039;t care about the &quot;popularity&quot; of a particular blog as some of the best blogs I have read are &quot;flippery fish&quot; and some of the &quot;large mammals&quot; well, I&#039;ve wondered why. 
But checking out blogrolls is fun; simply because it isn&#039;t someone the &quot;host&quot; has read in awhile doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t someone I wouldn&#039;t want to read.
In fact by limiting one&#039;s connection to someone quoted, one limits one&#039;s access to varied blogs. 
This is of course one&#039;s personal decision; but wouldn&#039;t it be better to simply ignore the &quot;popularity&quot; factor in terms of who one quotes or referrs to or blogrolls, or for that matter, the blogs one chooses to comment on?  
I don&#039;t get to everyone on my blogroll all the time; there are people I&#039;m more likely to read and less. Yet several times I&#039;ve &quot;ignored&quot; someone&#039;s blog for a period of time, only to return to it and find something I do quote or refer to.
Everyone on my blogroll is there because at one point or time I&#039;ve read something that has struck my interest, and while I may not agree with their stand on many issues, they have made me think. I hope by blogrolling them that others will find their words make them think as well, whether they agree or disagree with the poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often use blogrolls to find new blogs I haven&#8217;t tried before. I don&#8217;t care about the &#8220;popularity&#8221; of a particular blog as some of the best blogs I have read are &#8220;flippery fish&#8221; and some of the &#8220;large mammals&#8221; well, I&#8217;ve wondered why.<br />
But checking out blogrolls is fun; simply because it isn&#8217;t someone the &#8220;host&#8221; has read in awhile doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t someone I wouldn&#8217;t want to read.<br />
In fact by limiting one&#8217;s connection to someone quoted, one limits one&#8217;s access to varied blogs.<br />
This is of course one&#8217;s personal decision; but wouldn&#8217;t it be better to simply ignore the &#8220;popularity&#8221; factor in terms of who one quotes or referrs to or blogrolls, or for that matter, the blogs one chooses to comment on?<br />
I don&#8217;t get to everyone on my blogroll all the time; there are people I&#8217;m more likely to read and less. Yet several times I&#8217;ve &#8220;ignored&#8221; someone&#8217;s blog for a period of time, only to return to it and find something I do quote or refer to.<br />
Everyone on my blogroll is there because at one point or time I&#8217;ve read something that has struck my interest, and while I may not agree with their stand on many issues, they have made me think. I hope by blogrolling them that others will find their words make them think as well, whether they agree or disagree with the poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pax Nortona - A Blog by Joel Sax</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6515</link>
		<dc:creator>Pax Nortona - A Blog by Joel Sax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 01:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6515</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;White Male and Accepting It&lt;/strong&gt;

I am sick of seeing what I am supposed to be defined by those who are angry with the Dave Weiners of this world and by the Dave Weiners themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>White Male and Accepting It</strong></p>
<p>I am sick of seeing what I am supposed to be defined by those who are angry with the Dave Weiners of this world and by the Dave Weiners themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKMA’s Random Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>AKMA’s Random Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 00:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogrolls, Lists, Bookmarks, and So On&lt;/strong&gt;

While I&#8217;ve been concentrating on other obligations, various ructions have caught fire concerning links and ranking. I haven&#8217;t wrestled with this topic before, but sooner or later I may as well step in it. So, relative to blogrolls, I&#8217;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogrolls, Lists, Bookmarks, and So On</strong></p>
<p>While I&#8217;ve been concentrating on other obligations, various ructions have caught fire concerning links and ranking. I haven&#8217;t wrestled with this topic before, but sooner or later I may as well step in it. So, relative to blogrolls, I&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Evans Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Evans Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 12:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>I’ve never had a blogroll because my sidebars are too crowded as it is. 

One some of my sites I have a links category and write up weblogs there. Most of the weblogs aren’t ones that I read but I think they match the tastes, interests of many of the people who visit that particular site of mine. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve never had a blogroll because my sidebars are too crowded as it is. </p>
<p>One some of my sites I have a links category and write up weblogs there. Most of the weblogs aren’t ones that I read but I think they match the tastes, interests of many of the people who visit that particular site of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scribblingwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6443</link>
		<dc:creator>scribblingwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 07:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6443</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wailing and knashing of blogrolls&lt;/strong&gt;

In case you&#039;ve missed it, there is a controversy bubbling about the inequities of blog rankings, focusing on Technorati, the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wailing and knashing of blogrolls</strong></p>
<p>In case you&#8217;ve missed it, there is a controversy bubbling about the inequities of blog rankings, focusing on Technorati, the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordlackey</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6442</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordlackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6442</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t heard before of cutting out blogrolls entirely. However, a few days ago, independent of this idea, &lt;a href=&quot;http://demiorator.blogspot.com/2005/05/love-me-love-my-blog.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I wrote some about limiting my blogrolls&lt;/a&gt; to current favorites. I find long blogrolls quite mindnumbing. My eyes just glaze over. I&#039;m not really ready to take the plunge you have in eliminating the blogroll entirely because I don&#039;t regularly post about things I read on other blogs. But, hey, I applaud your action. It makes good sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard before of cutting out blogrolls entirely. However, a few days ago, independent of this idea, <a href="http://demiorator.blogspot.com/2005/05/love-me-love-my-blog.html" rel="nofollow">I wrote some about limiting my blogrolls</a> to current favorites. I find long blogrolls quite mindnumbing. My eyes just glaze over. I&#8217;m not really ready to take the plunge you have in eliminating the blogroll entirely because I don&#8217;t regularly post about things I read on other blogs. But, hey, I applaud your action. It makes good sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadahead</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6418</link>
		<dc:creator>dadahead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 02:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6418</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Don&#039;t kill the messenger&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve got yet another alternate solution for the anti-Ecosystem, anti-blogroll folks: Get over yourselves. Don&#039;t launch hysterical attacks on people for being popular or on those who document their popularity (NZ Bear). Look, the reason Instapundit su...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Don&#8217;t kill the messenger</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got yet another alternate solution for the anti-Ecosystem, anti-blogroll folks: Get over yourselves. Don&#8217;t launch hysterical attacks on people for being popular or on those who document their popularity (NZ Bear). Look, the reason Instapundit su&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something Requisitely Witty and Urbane</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6384</link>
		<dc:creator>Something Requisitely Witty and Urbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 20:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6384</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On &quot;To blogroll or not to blogroll&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

There is, I think, a fairly interesting discussion going on about the merits of the blogroll. It started, as best I can tell, with Burningbird&#039;s post, who mourns the lost opportunity to really explore the diversity of the blogosphere during</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On &#8220;To blogroll or not to blogroll&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>There is, I think, a fairly interesting discussion going on about the merits of the blogroll. It started, as best I can tell, with Burningbird&#8217;s post, who mourns the lost opportunity to really explore the diversity of the blogosphere during</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pig</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6383</link>
		<dc:creator>pig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6383</guid>
		<description>I want to remember, through this process, something Lauren did once. She wrote a post offering *anyone* who considered herself/himself a feminist to be included in her blogroll simply by asking for the inclusion. I&#039;ve been blogging for about nine months now and she&#039;s the only person I&#039;ve seen do that. Fantastic writer with substantial things to say and a huge multiple of the traffic I&#039;ll ever see - and she just handed me this link for the asking. It remained for several months, and even though it&#039;s gone now it was a generous and appreciated gift. The fact that she&#039;s doing things differently now, for more than one well thought out reason (whether or not we agree with her reasons) is something I would have hoped we (ok- some of us) could receive with a little more understanding, with a little tempering via the memory of some of the kind things she&#039;s done for us other feminist bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to remember, through this process, something Lauren did once. She wrote a post offering *anyone* who considered herself/himself a feminist to be included in her blogroll simply by asking for the inclusion. I&#8217;ve been blogging for about nine months now and she&#8217;s the only person I&#8217;ve seen do that. Fantastic writer with substantial things to say and a huge multiple of the traffic I&#8217;ll ever see &#8211; and she just handed me this link for the asking. It remained for several months, and even though it&#8217;s gone now it was a generous and appreciated gift. The fact that she&#8217;s doing things differently now, for more than one well thought out reason (whether or not we agree with her reasons) is something I would have hoped we (ok- some of us) could receive with a little more understanding, with a little tempering via the memory of some of the kind things she&#8217;s done for us other feminist bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6379</link>
		<dc:creator>mina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 19:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/05/on-linking-and-blogrolls/#comment-6379</guid>
		<description>oh, do reconsider.  you know, i first came to your site through the blogroll of bitch phd, another feminist blogger.  if it weren&#039;t for feminist blogrolls, i wouldn&#039;t ever have found this, and many, many, other worthy sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, do reconsider.  you know, i first came to your site through the blogroll of bitch phd, another feminist blogger.  if it weren&#8217;t for feminist blogrolls, i wouldn&#8217;t ever have found this, and many, many, other worthy sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.026 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 05:45:30 -->
