<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erica Jong On Laura Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:34:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: upyernoz</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7433</link>
		<dc:creator>upyernoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 15:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7433</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;… if I hear anyone call Laura Bush a “desperate housewife” again, I will scream. Laura Bush is hardly a helpless woman. She is a wealthy, powerful saleswoman for a political agenda.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

well, laura did start it (she compared herself to a desperate housewife during that correspondent&#039;s dinner thingy).  sure the label is inaccurate, but i&#039;ve been taking it as a tongue-in-cheek kind of thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>… if I hear anyone call Laura Bush a “desperate housewife” again, I will scream. Laura Bush is hardly a helpless woman. She is a wealthy, powerful saleswoman for a political agenda.</p></blockquote>
<p>well, laura did start it (she compared herself to a desperate housewife during that correspondent&#8217;s dinner thingy).  sure the label is inaccurate, but i&#8217;ve been taking it as a tongue-in-cheek kind of thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roni</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7428</link>
		<dc:creator>Roni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 14:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7428</guid>
		<description>OK, don&#039;t take away my feminist card, but Laura called herself a Desperate Housewive, so I think it&#039;s fair to keep calling herself that. 

1- It reminds us of the constant hypocrisy that is evident in all the Bush women. 

2- If she really is pro-choice as she whispered years ago, perhaps she is desperate. It&#039;s a stretch, I know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, don&#8217;t take away my feminist card, but Laura called herself a Desperate Housewive, so I think it&#8217;s fair to keep calling herself that. </p>
<p>1- It reminds us of the constant hypocrisy that is evident in all the Bush women. </p>
<p>2- If she really is pro-choice as she whispered years ago, perhaps she is desperate. It&#8217;s a stretch, I know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marian shah</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7424</link>
		<dc:creator>marian shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 13:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7424</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And one minor criticism for Ms. Jong: if I hear anyone call Laura Bush a “desperate housewife” again, I will scream. Laura Bush is hardly a helpless woman. She is a wealthy, powerful saleswoman for a political agenda.&lt;/i&gt;

THANK YOU!!! I never understood the Laura Bush Stepford Wife accusation. She&#039;s not a housewife. She is not home cleaning the White House (not that there would be anything wrong with that, but she&#039;s not!) Not only is she an activist alongside the president (whether or not one likes the agenda, it&#039;s true), she has been a librarian and teacher, and didn&#039;t she found a youth reading program? 

I&#039;ve heard her called Stepford because she &quot;smiles and doesn&#039;t disagree enough&quot; with her husband&#039;s positions. Well, what was she supposed to do? Engage in an argument with him during the debates, or the State of the Union address? And how do we know she doesn&#039;t disagree with him in private? I never saw Bill and Hillary argue in public, or John and Teresa. 

Why, whenever a conservative woman is happy and supports her husband,  she is called names, just because? 

Thanks for not doing that!! :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And one minor criticism for Ms. Jong: if I hear anyone call Laura Bush a “desperate housewife” again, I will scream. Laura Bush is hardly a helpless woman. She is a wealthy, powerful saleswoman for a political agenda.</i></p>
<p>THANK YOU!!! I never understood the Laura Bush Stepford Wife accusation. She&#8217;s not a housewife. She is not home cleaning the White House (not that there would be anything wrong with that, but she&#8217;s not!) Not only is she an activist alongside the president (whether or not one likes the agenda, it&#8217;s true), she has been a librarian and teacher, and didn&#8217;t she found a youth reading program? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard her called Stepford because she &#8220;smiles and doesn&#8217;t disagree enough&#8221; with her husband&#8217;s positions. Well, what was she supposed to do? Engage in an argument with him during the debates, or the State of the Union address? And how do we know she doesn&#8217;t disagree with him in private? I never saw Bill and Hillary argue in public, or John and Teresa. </p>
<p>Why, whenever a conservative woman is happy and supports her husband,  she is called names, just because? </p>
<p>Thanks for not doing that!! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loid</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>loid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 09:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>But other than the &quot;housewife&quot; thing, Jong&#039;s right on the money.

What I&#039;ve been wondering is, what&#039;s changed inside the Bush admin that they&#039;ve decided, after four years, to deploy Laura? For the first term her role seemed restricted to hanging out at the library telling people that reading to kids is good. I&#039;m wondering if it has to do with Karen Hughes&#039; new role as head of official State Department propoganda.

Really, though, did the Mideast vacation add anything at all to the Bush/&#039;Merica image? Or did it appear to everyone in the entire world to be a cheap PR ploy? And one that backfired in a couple of ways?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But other than the &#8220;housewife&#8221; thing, Jong&#8217;s right on the money.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve been wondering is, what&#8217;s changed inside the Bush admin that they&#8217;ve decided, after four years, to deploy Laura? For the first term her role seemed restricted to hanging out at the library telling people that reading to kids is good. I&#8217;m wondering if it has to do with Karen Hughes&#8217; new role as head of official State Department propoganda.</p>
<p>Really, though, did the Mideast vacation add anything at all to the Bush/&#8217;Merica image? Or did it appear to everyone in the entire world to be a cheap PR ploy? And one that backfired in a couple of ways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7407</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 04:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7407</guid>
		<description>Could Laura&#039;s donning of a black shawl be an indication of where the Bush Administration intends to go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Laura&#8217;s donning of a black shawl be an indication of where the Bush Administration intends to go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/25/erica-jong-on-laura-bush/#comment-7380</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;... if I hear anyone call Laura Bush a “desperate housewife” again, I will scream. Laura Bush is hardly a helpless woman. She is a wealthy, powerful saleswoman for a political agenda.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A-frickin&#039;-men, Lauren.  I second you on the screaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230; if I hear anyone call Laura Bush a “desperate housewife” again, I will scream. Laura Bush is hardly a helpless woman. She is a wealthy, powerful saleswoman for a political agenda.</p></blockquote>
<p>A-frickin&#8217;-men, Lauren.  I second you on the screaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 06:50:35 -->
