Comments on: Bush Screws Clinton

By: StealthBadger

StealthBadger — Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:08:22 +0000

This reminds me of Bush screwing Kennedy over NCLB…

“Sure, I’ll get behind this legislation! Let’s do this!”

after Kennedy leaves…

“It’ll be a cold day in hell before either it’s funded, OR you get any credit for it.”

By: Love vs. Hate | Cosmic Variance

Love vs. Hate | Cosmic Variance — Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:59:45 +0000

[...] everyone in Massachusetts, this is a great step forward. Now if we could win approval for Plan B contraception, preserve the right to get an abortion, and convince e [...]

By: Bill H.

Bill H. — Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:48:10 +0000

Well, it goes beyond even what Gilliard says….they’re against contraception BECAUSE in their deep down blackened hearts they can’t fathom or suffer the idea of women making their own choices with regard to controlling their sexuality, right?

By: randomliberal/Robert

randomliberal/Robert — Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:05:16 +0000

Clinton really should have seen that coming. Since when has the Bush administration actually kept a promise or been straight with Democrats? Fuck Bush and the FDA for going back on their word and playing politics with Plan B, but Clinton shouldn’t be so naïve.

By: zuzu

zuzu — Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:19:45 +0000

How is Plan B going to hide semen? You’d think a condom would be better for that.

By: ol cranky

ol cranky — Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:50:32 +0000

In the 33 countries where Plan B is available without a prescription, CWA argues, a handful of studies have shown a rise in sexually transmitted infections.

CWA argues study results inaccurately

It has even equated the drug to “a pedophile’s best friend,” imagining that a child rapist could slip the pill to a girl to “hide” his crime.

So the male child molester plans to ejactulate inside the at least close enough to pubescent female's vagina and fears she might get pregnant, leading to the possibility of capture? Wouldn't he then prefer to put her on a routine use contraceptive regimen instead of relying on something that will not only fail to terminate a pregnancy is used post ovulation, but could theoretically keep progesterone levels up high enough to aid implantation? They really are stretching to find straw-men to toss around, aren't they.