<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: OHNOES</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17962</link>
		<dc:creator>OHNOES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17962</guid>
		<description>Er, sorry, forgot to format the third paragraph.

Anyway, for what started out as &quot;trolling&quot;...

Quotes for facetiousness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, sorry, forgot to format the third paragraph.</p>
<p>Anyway, for what started out as &#8220;trolling&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Quotes for facetiousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OHNOES</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17961</link>
		<dc:creator>OHNOES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17961</guid>
		<description>*Channelling Andrea Harris* Wow, you people really need to get a life! */Channelling Andrea Harris.*

Sorry, I&#039;m bitter. :P

Anyway, for what started out as trolling, this is actually one of the more interesting debates I&#039;ve read in a while, even if it Godwined a long time back.

&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s almost as if you wanted to overreach and put the “big three” twentieth century totalitarian monsters in the “anti-Christian camp” to paint a picture of Christianity as our savior from tyranny. But, while calling Christainity the principle cause of slaughter is inaccurate, so is an attempt to call Christianity a historical bulwark between humanity and inhumanity. In fact, Christians have been on both sides of history since Constantine. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is not an illogical thing to say, but I think it is an inaccurate assumption to carry through to the end. I cannot speak for Dan, but many Christians feel that their religion is constantly painted as filled with &quot;dumb rednecks&quot;, &quot;murderous &quot;Crusading&quot; butchers&quot;, and other such ill will. It is a charge oft-repeated by so many self-important students and atheist chic types that the logical Christians are often very touchy about such things and eager to leap to smack down such goons. Anti-Christianity propaganda begets pro-Christianity propaganda. The latter statement is not entirely accurate though, because every one of Christianity&#039;s ills is taken under a microscope by the former type, so the latter is devoid of mentioning said ills because the former already covered them all. :P

Again, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;not speaking for Dan here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, just offering what I hope is helpful contextualization.

If it helps, I&#039;ve always seen it as the atheist chic types see Christianity as the &quot;popular norm of the masses&quot; and thus must be opposed with &quot;the TRUTH&quot; whereas the Christians see it kinda the opposite and feel they must defend their religion et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Channelling Andrea Harris* Wow, you people really need to get a life! */Channelling Andrea Harris.*</p>
<p>Sorry, I&#8217;m bitter. :P</p>
<p>Anyway, for what started out as trolling, this is actually one of the more interesting debates I&#8217;ve read in a while, even if it Godwined a long time back.</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s almost as if you wanted to overreach and put the “big three” twentieth century totalitarian monsters in the “anti-Christian camp” to paint a picture of Christianity as our savior from tyranny. But, while calling Christainity the principle cause of slaughter is inaccurate, so is an attempt to call Christianity a historical bulwark between humanity and inhumanity. In fact, Christians have been on both sides of history since Constantine. </p></blockquote>
<p>That is not an illogical thing to say, but I think it is an inaccurate assumption to carry through to the end. I cannot speak for Dan, but many Christians feel that their religion is constantly painted as filled with &#8220;dumb rednecks&#8221;, &#8220;murderous &#8220;Crusading&#8221; butchers&#8221;, and other such ill will. It is a charge oft-repeated by so many self-important students and atheist chic types that the logical Christians are often very touchy about such things and eager to leap to smack down such goons. Anti-Christianity propaganda begets pro-Christianity propaganda. The latter statement is not entirely accurate though, because every one of Christianity&#8217;s ills is taken under a microscope by the former type, so the latter is devoid of mentioning said ills because the former already covered them all. :P</p>
<p>Again, <em><strong>not speaking for Dan here</strong></em>, just offering what I hope is helpful contextualization.</p>
<p>If it helps, I&#8217;ve always seen it as the atheist chic types see Christianity as the &#8220;popular norm of the masses&#8221; and thus must be opposed with &#8220;the TRUTH&#8221; whereas the Christians see it kinda the opposite and feel they must defend their religion et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17898</link>
		<dc:creator>shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17898</guid>
		<description>Being chairman of the German Worker&#039;s Party was a bit more than street punk.   This was a year before leading 2000 brown shirts in attempting the failed revolution that landed him in jail.   But his rehetoric (lies about his own Christianity or not) worked pretty well, didn&#039;t it!   He was able to use their historical hatred of the Jews to his own ends.   &quot;The Jews killed Jesus and eat Christian babies.&quot;  That&#039;s all they needed to hear.     Today it&#039;s simiilar &quot;Muslims hate Christians&quot; and everybody starts waving the flag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being chairman of the German Worker&#8217;s Party was a bit more than street punk.   This was a year before leading 2000 brown shirts in attempting the failed revolution that landed him in jail.   But his rehetoric (lies about his own Christianity or not) worked pretty well, didn&#8217;t it!   He was able to use their historical hatred of the Jews to his own ends.   &#8220;The Jews killed Jesus and eat Christian babies.&#8221;  That&#8217;s all they needed to hear.     Today it&#8217;s simiilar &#8220;Muslims hate Christians&#8221; and everybody starts waving the flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17896</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17896</guid>
		<description>Pardon me, I was off by a year.  In 1922, he had taken charge of the splinter party, and would be lying to keep the support of the party&#039;s financiers, rather than convincing them to give him power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon me, I was off by a year.  In 1922, he had taken charge of the splinter party, and would be lying to keep the support of the party&#8217;s financiers, rather than convincing them to give him power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17891</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17891</guid>
		<description>Shelby, in 1922 HItler was a street punk trying to gain some influence in a splinter party.  Think that he might have been willing to lie just an eensy bit to get the support of the Christians running the party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shelby, in 1922 HItler was a street punk trying to gain some influence in a splinter party.  Think that he might have been willing to lie just an eensy bit to get the support of the Christians running the party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17889</link>
		<dc:creator>shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17889</guid>
		<description>Here is this quote from one of Hitler&#039;s speeches:

&quot;My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God&#039;s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

Replace the word &quot;Jews&quot; with terrorists and it might sound like GWB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is this quote from one of Hitler&#8217;s speeches:</p>
<p>&#8220;My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God&#8217;s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice&#8230; And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.</p>
<p>-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)</p>
<p>Replace the word &#8220;Jews&#8221; with terrorists and it might sound like GWB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17858</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised anybody was actually offended by that relatively harmless parody Oo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised anybody was actually offended by that relatively harmless parody Oo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody  Tresidder</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17773</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody  Tresidder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17773</guid>
		<description>Second that, Thomas.
And let us not overlook &quot;Gott Mit Uns&quot; (God With Us) on the German army belt buckles in both world wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second that, Thomas.<br />
And let us not overlook &#8220;Gott Mit Uns&#8221; (God With Us) on the German army belt buckles in both world wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17772</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17772</guid>
		<description>Dan, have you ever seen a swastika with the letters &quot;D-C&quot;?  German Christians, an organization of German Protestants who adopted Luther&#039;s antisemitism but departed significantly from the Augustinian doctrine of human worthlessness.  They formed the Reich Protestant Church in the early Thirties, and supported Hitler.  

Now, one could make an awfully good case that Lutheran theology was irreconsilable with Naziism, but one cannot say that the majority of German Protestants rejected the Nazis.  Nor can one say that about German Catholics.  

Dan, you started by pointing out that Christianity is not to blame for the worst mass-killings the world has known.  You pointed to Stalin and Mao as actively hostile to religion (any religion) -- and I was with you there.  Religious ideologies have no monopoly on bloodshed as against other ideologies.  Adding Hitler weakened your point -- he was willing to accomodate and use religion as long as it didn&#039;t get in his way.  It&#039;s almost as if you wanted to overreach and put the &quot;big three&quot; twentieth century totalitarian monsters in the &quot;anti-Christian camp&quot; to paint a picture of Christianity as our savior from tyranny.  But, while calling Christainity the principle cause of slaughter is inaccurate, so is an attempt to call Christianity a historical bulwark between humanity and inhumanity.  In fact, Christians have been on both sides of history since Constantine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, have you ever seen a swastika with the letters &#8220;D-C&#8221;?  German Christians, an organization of German Protestants who adopted Luther&#8217;s antisemitism but departed significantly from the Augustinian doctrine of human worthlessness.  They formed the Reich Protestant Church in the early Thirties, and supported Hitler.  </p>
<p>Now, one could make an awfully good case that Lutheran theology was irreconsilable with Naziism, but one cannot say that the majority of German Protestants rejected the Nazis.  Nor can one say that about German Catholics.  </p>
<p>Dan, you started by pointing out that Christianity is not to blame for the worst mass-killings the world has known.  You pointed to Stalin and Mao as actively hostile to religion (any religion) &#8212; and I was with you there.  Religious ideologies have no monopoly on bloodshed as against other ideologies.  Adding Hitler weakened your point &#8212; he was willing to accomodate and use religion as long as it didn&#8217;t get in his way.  It&#8217;s almost as if you wanted to overreach and put the &#8220;big three&#8221; twentieth century totalitarian monsters in the &#8220;anti-Christian camp&#8221; to paint a picture of Christianity as our savior from tyranny.  But, while calling Christainity the principle cause of slaughter is inaccurate, so is an attempt to call Christianity a historical bulwark between humanity and inhumanity.  In fact, Christians have been on both sides of history since Constantine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Believer</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17759</link>
		<dc:creator>Believer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/10/12/go-now/#comment-17759</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does every argument about religion end up as a debate of Hitler&#039;s philosophy? Personally, I don&#039;t like using crazy people&#039;s philosophy on either side of a discussion -- it&#039;s just too unreliable.

Anyway, thanks for starting off the discussion with a mention of my site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does every argument about religion end up as a debate of Hitler&#8217;s philosophy? Personally, I don&#8217;t like using crazy people&#8217;s philosophy on either side of a discussion &#8212; it&#8217;s just too unreliable.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for starting off the discussion with a mention of my site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.037 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 02:18:49 -->
