<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Bring the Crazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: B Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21205</link>
		<dc:creator>B Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21205</guid>
		<description>Defend what boys?  

I&#039;m through here, if all anybody wants to do is nitpick details trying to win cheap debate points, I have better things to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defend what boys?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m through here, if all anybody wants to do is nitpick details trying to win cheap debate points, I have better things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginmar</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21203</link>
		<dc:creator>ginmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21203</guid>
		<description>Christ, why are you all responding to this troll? He&#039;s got strawmen all over the place---Phelps was invited to the DNC or whatever---and he&#039;s just trying to defend his boys.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ, why are you all responding to this troll? He&#8217;s got strawmen all over the place&#8212;Phelps was invited to the DNC or whatever&#8212;and he&#8217;s just trying to defend his boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21201</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21201</guid>
		<description>You still haven&#039;t explained how a comment directed to a question about Bush&#039;s candor with the 9/11 commission somehow makes Dean an anti-semite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You still haven&#8217;t explained how a comment directed to a question about Bush&#8217;s candor with the 9/11 commission somehow makes Dean an anti-semite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21200</link>
		<dc:creator>B Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21200</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s laughable. You’re really stretching.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is my response to most of Dean&#039;s comments, including the one about the Saudi warning being an &quot;interesting theory&quot;.  The fact that he left himself wiggle room makes it more insidious in my eyes.  And I understand the difference between Israel and Jews, but how much of Dean and McKinney&#039;s target audience does?  

And still no response to this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;When Jill made the thread about the Saudi culture of misogyny and abuse in marriage, some of us were a little taken aback by her “of course we have those problems too” statement about the US, feeling that it was not fair, necessary or appropriate to make such a comparison. It is interesting to see the identical reaction now that the shoe is on the other foot. Although it is disturbing to me that it is alright to concede the US has problems compared to other countries, but out of line to compare Democratic problems to Republican.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

An off-topic aside, but does anybody know if Dean is still wearing that old belt of his brother?  Or was that just a moldy old campaign prop, like Theresa&#039;s last name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That’s laughable. You’re really stretching.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is my response to most of Dean&#8217;s comments, including the one about the Saudi warning being an &#8220;interesting theory&#8221;.  The fact that he left himself wiggle room makes it more insidious in my eyes.  And I understand the difference between Israel and Jews, but how much of Dean and McKinney&#8217;s target audience does?  </p>
<p>And still no response to this:</p>
<blockquote><p>When Jill made the thread about the Saudi culture of misogyny and abuse in marriage, some of us were a little taken aback by her “of course we have those problems too” statement about the US, feeling that it was not fair, necessary or appropriate to make such a comparison. It is interesting to see the identical reaction now that the shoe is on the other foot. Although it is disturbing to me that it is alright to concede the US has problems compared to other countries, but out of line to compare Democratic problems to Republican.</p></blockquote>
<p>An off-topic aside, but does anybody know if Dean is still wearing that old belt of his brother?  Or was that just a moldy old campaign prop, like Theresa&#8217;s last name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhw</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21199</link>
		<dc:creator>bhw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21199</guid>
		<description>Too funny. I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhwblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/11/pat_robertson_g.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a post&lt;/a&gt; about this with almost the identical title the other day. 8-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny. I wrote <a href="http://www.bhwblog.com/movabletype/archives/2005/11/pat_robertson_g.html" rel="nofollow">a post</a> about this with almost the identical title the other day. 8-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21197</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 06:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21197</guid>
		<description>Only if they&#039;re Communion wafers.  Then it&#039;s blasphemy, and we&#039;ll have no choice but to string you up, you [insert anti-Jew slur here].

Necco or Nilla wafers, no worries. 

Mmmm, nilla wafers and a bowl of banana pudding. Trash cuisine heaven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if they&#8217;re Communion wafers.  Then it&#8217;s blasphemy, and we&#8217;ll have no choice but to string you up, you [insert anti-Jew slur here].</p>
<p>Necco or Nilla wafers, no worries. </p>
<p>Mmmm, nilla wafers and a bowl of banana pudding. Trash cuisine heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff G</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 06:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21196</guid>
		<description>I have dreams where a naked Pat Robertson feeds me wafers. Is that so wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have dreams where a naked Pat Robertson feeds me wafers. Is that so wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill from INDC</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21194</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill from INDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21194</guid>
		<description>&quot;ignored&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ignored&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill from INDC</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21193</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill from INDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21193</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Who condemned Roberston, Bill?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, much of the right-wing blogosphere, for starters. As a recent example, look around at the reactions to his latest idiocy on libertarian/right wing blogs (including mine). Mockery, where he&#039;s not &lt;em&gt;ingnored&lt;/em&gt;. You won&#039;t find many (any?) feting his random ramblings, that&#039;s for sure. 

In contrast, Kos &lt;em&gt;recommends &lt;/em&gt;Howard Dean for DNCC after his crazy soundbites about blacks, Republicans and Osama bin Laden. There is a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Who condemned Roberston, Bill?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, much of the right-wing blogosphere, for starters. As a recent example, look around at the reactions to his latest idiocy on libertarian/right wing blogs (including mine). Mockery, where he&#8217;s not <em>ingnored</em>. You won&#8217;t find many (any?) feting his random ramblings, that&#8217;s for sure. </p>
<p>In contrast, Kos <em>recommends </em>Howard Dean for DNCC after his crazy soundbites about blacks, Republicans and Osama bin Laden. There is a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21189</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/10/we-bring-the-crazy/#comment-21189</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And Dean said he couldn’t discount the theory that the Saudi’s had warned Bush because he had been hearing alot of people say that, or something along those lines, so he didn’t directly link the jews either, just another indirect shot at the-middle-eastern-country-that-doesn’t-count.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s laughable.  You&#039;re really stretching.  

The Bushes are personal friends and business associates of the House of Saud.  Most of the highjackers were Saudis.  How does that get us to &quot;Howard Dean blames the Jews?&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200407280006&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Even Sean Hannity admitted that he misstated Dean&#039;s comments&lt;/a&gt;

What Dean actually said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;When Rehm asked Dean in a Dec. 1 interview why he thought Bush wasn&#039;t more forthcoming with the commission investigating the terrorist attacks, Dean replied, &#039;The most interesting theory that I&#039;ve heard so far -- which is nothing more than a theory, it can&#039;t be proved -- is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis.&#039;&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, and Israel /= all Jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And Dean said he couldn’t discount the theory that the Saudi’s had warned Bush because he had been hearing alot of people say that, or something along those lines, so he didn’t directly link the jews either, just another indirect shot at the-middle-eastern-country-that-doesn’t-count.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s laughable.  You&#8217;re really stretching.  </p>
<p>The Bushes are personal friends and business associates of the House of Saud.  Most of the highjackers were Saudis.  How does that get us to &#8220;Howard Dean blames the Jews?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200407280006" rel="nofollow">Even Sean Hannity admitted that he misstated Dean&#8217;s comments</a></p>
<p>What Dean actually said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When Rehm asked Dean in a Dec. 1 interview why he thought Bush wasn&#8217;t more forthcoming with the commission investigating the terrorist attacks, Dean replied, &#8216;The most interesting theory that I&#8217;ve heard so far &#8212; which is nothing more than a theory, it can&#8217;t be proved &#8212; is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis.&#8217;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, and Israel /= all Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.091 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 02:51:13 -->
