<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;She Was Asking For It&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Think have achieved equality? Think again.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22459</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Think have achieved equality? Think again.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22459</guid>
		<description>[...]  he has had. 	We live in a rape culture where many people continue to blame the victims of rape and domestic violence. 	Wives/mothers are still expected to do most  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  he has had. 	We live in a rape culture where many people continue to blame the victims of rape and domestic violence. 	Wives/mothers are still expected to do most  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22458</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22458</guid>
		<description>Some teacher you are. You&#039;re just an English pointer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some teacher you are. You&#8217;re just an English pointer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22457</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22457</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; Hell, you’re an English teacher; you should have suggested a half-dozen possiblities already.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m a facilitator, not a hand-it-to-you-er.

Thesaurus be damned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Hell, you’re an English teacher; you should have suggested a half-dozen possiblities already.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m a facilitator, not a hand-it-to-you-er.</p>
<p>Thesaurus be damned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22456</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22456</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;David, is “sexual security” anything like “social security”?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No. If it were, the government would provide free prostitutes for the elderly and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sexwork.com/coalition/dutchgermannews.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;disabled&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;em&gt;Security&lt;/em&gt; isn&#039;t best word, but it brings in fewer extraneous connotations than &lt;em&gt;integrity&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;autonomy&lt;/em&gt;, or &lt;em&gt;preservation&lt;/em&gt;. Sadly, I don&#039;t have a thesaurus on hand to find the best word. Hell, you&#039;re an English teacher; you should have suggested a half-dozen possiblities already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>David, is “sexual security” anything like “social security”?</p></blockquote>
<p>No. If it were, the government would provide free prostitutes for the elderly and <a href="http://www.sexwork.com/coalition/dutchgermannews.html" rel="nofollow">disabled</a>.</p>
<p><em>Security</em> isn&#8217;t best word, but it brings in fewer extraneous connotations than <em>integrity</em>, <em>autonomy</em>, or <em>preservation</em>. Sadly, I don&#8217;t have a thesaurus on hand to find the best word. Hell, you&#8217;re an English teacher; you should have suggested a half-dozen possiblities already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22452</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22452</guid>
		<description>David, is &quot;sexual security&quot; anything like &quot;social security&quot;?  Is the government trying to shut down &quot;sexual security&quot; anytime soon?

Oh, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/category/feminism/reproductive-rights/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yes&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, is &#8220;sexual security&#8221; anything like &#8220;social security&#8221;?  Is the government trying to shut down &#8220;sexual security&#8221; anytime soon?</p>
<p>Oh, <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/category/feminism/reproductive-rights/" rel="nofollow">yes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22446</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22446</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2005/11/this_is_what_fe.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; gave me something to think about.

&lt;em&gt;My choices are to avoid men and dating altogether, behave like a 16-year-old and only go on dates where things are highly structured to avoid being alone with a guy, or do what I like knowing full well if I were to get raped, there&#039;s not likely to be any kind of justice for me. I tend to play the odds and go with number 3--act like I&#039;m a free adult in a society that disagrees with me and will look away if I&#039;m &quot;punished&quot; for it--and the theory that life is short and risks have to be taken if you want to live it.&lt;/em&gt;

My mistake was in presuming that Nick Kiddle (and Amanda) had a &lt;strong&gt;compelling&lt;/strong&gt; interest in their sexual security, when it turns out that interest is trumped by their interest in sexual adventurism. I still consider that an exceptionally poor trade, but whatever. It&#039;s not my genitals they&#039;re playing roulette with, so it&#039;s not my problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2005/11/this_is_what_fe.html" rel="nofollow">This</a> gave me something to think about.</p>
<p><em>My choices are to avoid men and dating altogether, behave like a 16-year-old and only go on dates where things are highly structured to avoid being alone with a guy, or do what I like knowing full well if I were to get raped, there&#8217;s not likely to be any kind of justice for me. I tend to play the odds and go with number 3&#8211;act like I&#8217;m a free adult in a society that disagrees with me and will look away if I&#8217;m &#8220;punished&#8221; for it&#8211;and the theory that life is short and risks have to be taken if you want to live it.</em></p>
<p>My mistake was in presuming that Nick Kiddle (and Amanda) had a <strong>compelling</strong> interest in their sexual security, when it turns out that interest is trumped by their interest in sexual adventurism. I still consider that an exceptionally poor trade, but whatever. It&#8217;s not my genitals they&#8217;re playing roulette with, so it&#8217;s not my problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnifeGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22280</link>
		<dc:creator>KnifeGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22280</guid>
		<description>Yeah, we tried that a few times earlier, but he didn&#039;t seem to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we tried that a few times earlier, but he didn&#8217;t seem to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheelzebub</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22214</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22214</guid>
		<description>WRT to the assertion that men get raped in prison--here&#039;s a newsflash: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amnestyusa.org/women/womeninprison.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WOMEN IN PRISON GET RAPED TOO&lt;/a&gt;.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRT to the assertion that men get raped in prison&#8211;here&#8217;s a newsflash: <a href="http://www.amnestyusa.org/women/womeninprison.html" rel="nofollow">WOMEN IN PRISON GET RAPED TOO</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnifeGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22069</link>
		<dc:creator>KnifeGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22069</guid>
		<description>Yes, precisely.  No means no, but it doesn&#039;t necessarily mean &quot;no, get your clothes on and leave&quot;.  It can mean &quot;No, check back in ten minutes&quot;, &quot;no, maybe after 3 more dates&quot;, &quot;no, never&quot; or any number of nos.   But it means NO when it&#039;s said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, precisely.  No means no, but it doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean &#8220;no, get your clothes on and leave&#8221;.  It can mean &#8220;No, check back in ten minutes&#8221;, &#8220;no, maybe after 3 more dates&#8221;, &#8220;no, never&#8221; or any number of nos.   But it means NO when it&#8217;s said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22063</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/11/17/she-was-asking-for-it/#comment-22063</guid>
		<description>If I am insufficiently aroused for any reason then penetration is not going to provide maximum pleasure. At best.  At worst, penetration might be painful or even injurious. And scary.  For my pleasure, comfort and safety and to prevent injury to MY body (you idiots) I, a woman, need to be in control of the pace at which things go. Maybe, if things go well, I might be willing to keep going. But my &quot;no&quot; means &quot;no&quot;.  If you, who are supposedly so knowledgeable and worldly, have not created a climate in which I can be specific, then you cannot possibly assume you know if that &quot;no&quot; means &quot;Not for about ten more minutes of this or I need more of that&quot;. Or, &quot;No. Not tonight,&quot; Or &quot;No, not with you ever.&#039; You can only know that my &quot;no&quot; means you cannot proceed or that you have to stop. You can ask for--not require--clarification. (Since only one of us can kill the other with bare hands don&#039;t imagine that this is a safe point for me to piss you off with the third option.)  If things go well and my &quot;No&quot; turns out to have been &quot;No, not for about ten more minutes of your biggest chore&#039;,  and we have penetration and I like it and it&#039;s successful,  don&#039;t show me how stupid you are by smugly saying afterward that, &quot;Oh you women! You say &quot;no&quot; when you really mean &quot;yes&quot;. You idiots!  My &quot;no&quot; did mean exactly &quot;NO!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I am insufficiently aroused for any reason then penetration is not going to provide maximum pleasure. At best.  At worst, penetration might be painful or even injurious. And scary.  For my pleasure, comfort and safety and to prevent injury to MY body (you idiots) I, a woman, need to be in control of the pace at which things go. Maybe, if things go well, I might be willing to keep going. But my &#8220;no&#8221; means &#8220;no&#8221;.  If you, who are supposedly so knowledgeable and worldly, have not created a climate in which I can be specific, then you cannot possibly assume you know if that &#8220;no&#8221; means &#8220;Not for about ten more minutes of this or I need more of that&#8221;. Or, &#8220;No. Not tonight,&#8221; Or &#8220;No, not with you ever.&#8217; You can only know that my &#8220;no&#8221; means you cannot proceed or that you have to stop. You can ask for&#8211;not require&#8211;clarification. (Since only one of us can kill the other with bare hands don&#8217;t imagine that this is a safe point for me to piss you off with the third option.)  If things go well and my &#8220;No&#8221; turns out to have been &#8220;No, not for about ten more minutes of your biggest chore&#8217;,  and we have penetration and I like it and it&#8217;s successful,  don&#8217;t show me how stupid you are by smugly saying afterward that, &#8220;Oh you women! You say &#8220;no&#8221; when you really mean &#8220;yes&#8221;. You idiots!  My &#8220;no&#8221; did mean exactly &#8220;NO!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.036 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 05:02:49 -->
