<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Checks the President, and What Should We Ask Alito?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Palcewski</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27786</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palcewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27786</guid>
		<description>I watched much of the hearing on Fox News because sitting here in my office watching a web C-Span stream would eventually put severe bruises on my slender ectomorphic ass. 

Anyway, in the middle of it--and I really wish I could remember which senator was speaking at the time--Fox went to News Flash mode and ran a double screen showing the NYSE board approaching the 11,000 DJA. 

As for analysis, it depends on who was talking when that news flash occurred. 

If it came during an anti-Alito rant by a Democrat, well, what a great way for the wingnuts to shift the focus from the strip-searcher to how great the Bush tax-breaks-for-the-rich economy is.

If the news flash came as a Republican was kissing the strip searcher&#039;s ass, well Jeeze Louise, what a lucky friggin&#039; break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched much of the hearing on Fox News because sitting here in my office watching a web C-Span stream would eventually put severe bruises on my slender ectomorphic ass. </p>
<p>Anyway, in the middle of it&#8211;and I really wish I could remember which senator was speaking at the time&#8211;Fox went to News Flash mode and ran a double screen showing the NYSE board approaching the 11,000 DJA. </p>
<p>As for analysis, it depends on who was talking when that news flash occurred. </p>
<p>If it came during an anti-Alito rant by a Democrat, well, what a great way for the wingnuts to shift the focus from the strip-searcher to how great the Bush tax-breaks-for-the-rich economy is.</p>
<p>If the news flash came as a Republican was kissing the strip searcher&#8217;s ass, well Jeeze Louise, what a lucky friggin&#8217; break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27752</link>
		<dc:creator>B Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27752</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But let’s be realistic. The Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. Which means that ALL phases of legislation are well within their control — they can pass legislation even if every last Democrat and Independent in Congress votes against it. Other than filibusters, Democrats really have no power to influence legislation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

True that.  I just like to blame the right ones. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But let’s be realistic. The Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. Which means that ALL phases of legislation are well within their control — they can pass legislation even if every last Democrat and Independent in Congress votes against it. Other than filibusters, Democrats really have no power to influence legislation.</p></blockquote>
<p>True that.  I just like to blame the right ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27746</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27746</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;How much do you have to bribe those grade school kids to write your rebuttals for you?&lt;/em&gt;

A lot. They have to work hard to write at a level you can comprehend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>How much do you have to bribe those grade school kids to write your rebuttals for you?</em></p>
<p>A lot. They have to work hard to write at a level you can comprehend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27739</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27739</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah I am, but so is blaming it on Bush because he signed it. Who were Spectre’s co-horts, by the way? I haven’t been able to find out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know, either; looks like that link you provided only gives the House sponsorship.  

Actually, I can&#039;t really blame Bush for signing a must-pass DOJ reauthorization bill, because it&#039;s very, very broad.  Specter and whoever else slipped it in, yes.  

These omnibus bills with little poison pills slipped in are a big reason why Senators don&#039;t get elected President -- it&#039;s too easy to bludgeon them with &quot;You voted against the Defense bill!  You hate our troops!&quot; when they were, say, taking a principled stand over a rider that had nothing to do with defense appropriations.

But let&#039;s be realistic.  The Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.  Which means that ALL phases of legislation are well within their control -- they can pass legislation even if every last Democrat and Independent in Congress votes against it.  Other than filibusters, Democrats really have no power to influence legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah I am, but so is blaming it on Bush because he signed it. Who were Spectre’s co-horts, by the way? I haven’t been able to find out.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, either; looks like that link you provided only gives the House sponsorship.  </p>
<p>Actually, I can&#8217;t really blame Bush for signing a must-pass DOJ reauthorization bill, because it&#8217;s very, very broad.  Specter and whoever else slipped it in, yes.  </p>
<p>These omnibus bills with little poison pills slipped in are a big reason why Senators don&#8217;t get elected President &#8212; it&#8217;s too easy to bludgeon them with &#8220;You voted against the Defense bill!  You hate our troops!&#8221; when they were, say, taking a principled stand over a rider that had nothing to do with defense appropriations.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s be realistic.  The Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.  Which means that ALL phases of legislation are well within their control &#8212; they can pass legislation even if every last Democrat and Independent in Congress votes against it.  Other than filibusters, Democrats really have no power to influence legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe &#187; More Unintended Pregnancies Carried to Term</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27732</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe &#187; More Unintended Pregnancies Carried to Term</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27732</guid>
		<description>[...] 		More Unintended Pregnancies Carried to Term Posted by Jill @ 7:43 pm  	 			 					The previous post is loosely choice-related, but here&#8217;s my real Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 		More Unintended Pregnancies Carried to Term<br />
 Posted by Jill @ 7:43 pm </p>
<p> 					The previous post is loosely choice-related, but here&#8217;s my real Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27729</link>
		<dc:creator>B Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27729</guid>
		<description>How much do you have to bribe those grade school kids to write your rebuttals for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much do you have to bribe those grade school kids to write your rebuttals for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27728</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27728</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Yeah I am, but so is blaming it on Bush because he signed it.&lt;/em&gt;

Aw, poor little B Moe&#039;s fee-fees hurt just because I referred to an aspect of a bill becoming law.

It must suck to be Bush right now. Casually mention one of his minor accomplishments*, and his defenders accuse you of *blaming* him. Way to stab your president in the back, dude. 

*yes, signing an appropriations bill is an accomplishment. Were I president, and absent a line-item veto, I&#039;d likely have done exactly what B Moe accuses me of &quot;blaming Bush&quot; of doing. Though I might have taken time out to subject Bill from INDC to  Extraordinary Rendition in Ann Arbor first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Yeah I am, but so is blaming it on Bush because he signed it.</em></p>
<p>Aw, poor little B Moe&#8217;s fee-fees hurt just because I referred to an aspect of a bill becoming law.</p>
<p>It must suck to be Bush right now. Casually mention one of his minor accomplishments*, and his defenders accuse you of *blaming* him. Way to stab your president in the back, dude. </p>
<p>*yes, signing an appropriations bill is an accomplishment. Were I president, and absent a line-item veto, I&#8217;d likely have done exactly what B Moe accuses me of &#8220;blaming Bush&#8221; of doing. Though I might have taken time out to subject Bill from INDC to  Extraordinary Rendition in Ann Arbor first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27726</link>
		<dc:creator>B Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27726</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BMoe, you’re being disingenuous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah I am, but so is blaming it on Bush because he signed it.  Who were Spectre&#039;s co-horts, by the way?  I haven&#039;t been able to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>BMoe, you’re being disingenuous.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah I am, but so is blaming it on Bush because he signed it.  Who were Spectre&#8217;s co-horts, by the way?  I haven&#8217;t been able to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27708</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27708</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does the Constitution require that courts provide the same legal protections to gays as to racial minorities and women?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How do you define &quot;legal protection&quot;? Does it include, say, marriage, or do you mean just anti-discrimination legislation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does the Constitution require that courts provide the same legal protections to gays as to racial minorities and women?</p></blockquote>
<p>How do you define &#8220;legal protection&#8221;? Does it include, say, marriage, or do you mean just anti-discrimination legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27696</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/01/09/who-checks-the-president/#comment-27696</guid>
		<description>Sorry.  Reauthorization bill, not appropriations.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry.  Reauthorization bill, not appropriations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
