Makes me wonder if this guy wears extra big pants to hide a constant hard-on that he is trying so hard to get rid of through legalized guilt.

I wonder what age groups he focuses on. I mean while 15 year olds are curiously groping themselves, a truly abused child is acting out what they were taught by some adult, with another adult.

But alas, most important to keep an eye on pubescent erections and the pubescent genitalia or hands that might touch it.

On topic, does this mean that if I was 15, I could kiss, fondle, grope, and suck a boyfriend’s boob, but not a girlfriend’s boob? Why the double standard?

Because being gay rocks! Kansas knows it’s a decision little boys and girls make, and they just want to make sure they do everything they can to encourage more little queer scapegoats for their witch hunts. That way they’ll never have to address actual problems; it’s persecution on a loop!

Jones asked: “What sex act would be legal for a 15-year-old?”

Kline replied: “I’ve seen references about kissing and telling, but that’s not a part of Kansas law.”

Jones asked Kline what contact would be acceptable.

“It’s difficult for me to say, maybe, kissing and petting,” Kline said.

Jones: “Would fondling of the genitalia be included?”

Kline: “Again, it’s difficult to say.”

Jones: “What do you mean by petting?”

Kline: “Something that doesn’t shock the moral conscience.”

Jones: “Would you include French-kissing?”

Kline: “I don’t believe so.”

Jones: “What if the French-kissing occurred while lying on top of each other?”

Kline paused.

“I don’t believe so.”

Then Kline distilled his opinion: “The rape of a child is abuse.”

On topic, does this mean that if I was 15, I could kiss, fondle, grope, and suck a boyfriend’s boob, but not a girlfriend’s boob? Why the double standard? I don’t think any hypothetical girlfriend would appreciate that very much…