Comments on: Keep An Eye on South Dakota http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/ In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:34:52 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jen's Den of Iniquity http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33729 Jen's Den of Iniquity Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:04:00 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33729 <strong>failing words, falling back on sisters</strong> since eloquence eludes me, i’ll let others say it better than myself: bitch ph.d.: not to put too fine a point on it Of course, women with money will just leave the state for their abortions. If they’re smart, a lot of them won’t c... failing words, falling back on sisters

since eloquence eludes me, i’ll let others say it better than myself:
bitch ph.d.: not to put too fine a point on it
Of course, women with money will just leave the state for their abortions. If they’re smart, a lot of them won’t c…

]]> By: Anne (the other one) http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33612 Anne (the other one) Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:49:03 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33612 ...I mean, it probably will be, but I'm just saying. …I mean, it probably will be, but I’m just saying.

]]> By: Anne (the other one) http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33595 Anne (the other one) Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:08:00 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33595 It hasn't been signed yet, as far as I know. It hasn’t been signed yet, as far as I know.

]]> By: Anne http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33594 Anne Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:17:54 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33594 There already aren't any doctors in SD who will perform abortions--existing laws already made them all back off. They now fly the doctors in from Minnesota, but if this law goes through, they won't even be able to manage that. There already aren’t any doctors in SD who will perform abortions–existing laws already made them all back off. They now fly the doctors in from Minnesota, but if this law goes through, they won’t even be able to manage that.

]]> By: Pam's House Blend http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33593 Pam's House Blend Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:16:39 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33593 <strong>Womb control full steam ahead</strong> South Dakota is going full steam ahead with womb control measures...Shakes Sis, Amanda at Pandagon, and Jill at Feministe weigh in. Womb control full steam ahead

South Dakota is going full steam ahead with womb control measures…Shakes Sis, Amanda at Pandagon, and Jill at Feministe weigh in.

]]> By: Shades Of Grey http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33592 Shades Of Grey Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:15:38 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33592 <strong>The reason South Dakota is getting away with it</strong> The problem is the people who pay lip service to women's rights, but don't actually follow up. The reason South Dakota is getting away with it

The problem is the people who pay lip service to women’s rights, but don’t actually follow up.

]]> By: randomliberal/Robert http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33590 randomliberal/Robert Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:10:23 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33590 Yeah, that's why I included all late-term abortions (and I meant to include 2nd trimester, though that's quite possibly a misdefinition on my part). Yeah, that’s why I included all late-term abortions (and I meant to include 2nd trimester, though that’s quite possibly a misdefinition on my part).

]]> By: Jane http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33574 Jane Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:47:01 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33574 <blockquote>women can kiss late-term abortions goodbye</blockquote> Unfortunately, because there's no such thing as "partial-birth abortion," the wording of the ban is vague enough that abortions in the second trimester could be banned as well, depending on who's doing the interpreting. (note: probably not the abortion provider)

women can kiss late-term abortions goodbye

Unfortunately, because there’s no such thing as “partial-birth abortion,” the wording of the ban is vague enough that abortions in the second trimester could be banned as well, depending on who’s doing the interpreting. (note: probably not the abortion provider)

]]> By: randomliberal/Robert http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33564 randomliberal/Robert Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:47:03 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33564 Gack! My strikethrough tags didn't work. That should say: "...federal <strike>Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don’t Know What’s Good for Them </strike>Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Kennedy voted with the minority in the 2000 case which overturned the incredibly similar Nebraska <strike>Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don’t Know What’s Good for Them</strike> Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Gack! My strikethrough tags didn’t work. That should say:

“…federal Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don’t Know What’s Good for Them Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Kennedy voted with the minority in the 2000 case which overturned the incredibly similar Nebraska Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don’t Know What’s Good for Them Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.

]]> By: randomliberal/Robert http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33563 randomliberal/Robert Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:45:00 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/02/22/keep-an-eye-on-south-dakota/#comment-33563 On this particular bill, I think Stephen is right. At the very least, there are five pro-<i>Casey</i> votes (Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, and Kennedy), and I don't think Kennedy has shifted so far as to overturn <i>Casey</i>. The one that worries me, and should worry everyone, IMO, is the case SCOTUS just granted cert for, <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/3676265.html" rel="nofollow"><i>Gonzales v. Carhart</i></a>, which challenges the federal Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don't Know What's Good for Them Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Kennedy voted with the minority in the 2000 case which overturned the incredibly similar Nebraska Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don't Know What's Good for Them Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. So unless Roberts or Alito shock the world, women can kiss late-term abortions goodbye. On this particular bill, I think Stephen is right. At the very least, there are five pro-Casey votes (Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, and Kennedy), and I don’t think Kennedy has shifted so far as to overturn Casey.

The one that worries me, and should worry everyone, IMO, is the case SCOTUS just granted cert for, Gonzales v. Carhart, which challenges the federal Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don’t Know What’s Good for Them Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Kennedy voted with the minority in the 2000 case which overturned the incredibly similar Nebraska Women Are Stupid Hos Who Don’t Know What’s Good for Them Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. So unless Roberts or Alito shock the world, women can kiss late-term abortions goodbye.

]]>