Comments on: Not-So-Smooth Criminals http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/ In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:18:49 +0000 hourly 1 By: Person http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36433 Person Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:41:13 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36433 They can't just be overly ambitious or workaholic? Interesting though. They can’t just be overly ambitious or workaholic? Interesting though.

]]> By: sookietex http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36407 sookietex Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:03:56 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36407 submited for your approval "Psychologists have formally recognized <a href="http://rncnyc2004.blogspot.com/2006/03/john-henryism-health-outcomes-in.html" rel="nofollow">John Henryism</a> as a style of strong coping behaviors used by many African Americans to deal with psychosocial and environmental stressors such as career issues, health problems and even racism. The researchers quantify John Henryism using a questionnaire that reveals a 'single-minded' drive to succeed, even beyond a person's overall self-interest, which is the hallmark of JH," submited for your approval

“Psychologists have formally recognized John Henryism as a style of strong coping behaviors used by many African Americans to deal with psychosocial and environmental stressors such as career issues, health problems and even racism.

The researchers quantify John Henryism using a questionnaire that reveals a ‘single-minded’ drive to succeed, even beyond a person’s overall self-interest, which is the hallmark of JH,”

]]> By: Linnaeus http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36338 Linnaeus Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:02:18 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36338 If I watched <i>The Simpsons</i> enough, I probably would have. I think I've seen not more than 20 episodes during its entire run. If I watched The Simpsons enough, I probably would have. I think I’ve seen not more than 20 episodes during its entire run.

]]> By: piny http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36336 piny Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:54:31 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36336 I can't believe no one's made a <em>Simpsons </em>reference yet. I can’t believe no one’s made a Simpsons reference yet.

]]> By: Linnaeus http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36333 Linnaeus Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:43:58 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36333 Geek that I am, I probably would have said, "This bill's fake! In 1934, Cleveland's portrait was on the $1000 bill!" Geek that I am, I probably would have said, “This bill’s fake! In 1934, Cleveland’s portrait was on the $1000 bill!”

]]> By: zuzu http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36331 zuzu Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:39:47 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36331 Grover Cleveland. And they were dated 1934. Grover Cleveland. And they were dated 1934.

]]> By: Dianne http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36330 Dianne Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:37:32 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/03/15/not-so-smooth-criminals/#comment-36330 Whose face did they put on the $1 billion bills? Whose face did they put on the $1 billion bills?

]]>