<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Nice Guys&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: nonwhiteperson</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49485</link>
		<dc:creator>nonwhiteperson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49485</guid>
		<description>The Happy Feminist said, &quot;It may be tougher for shy guys to get a date than for confident guys, but that is a quite different issue than this post...asshole is not the opposite of shy. But, you see, there is such a thing as a nice confident guy.&quot;

A nice, confident man. No quote marks. That&#039;s the ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Happy Feminist said, &#8220;It may be tougher for shy guys to get a date than for confident guys, but that is a quite different issue than this post&#8230;asshole is not the opposite of shy. But, you see, there is such a thing as a nice confident guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>A nice, confident man. No quote marks. That&#8217;s the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49405</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49405</guid>
		<description>Hershele.

I thought we knew that already.

Well.  They do.

Next question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hershele.</p>
<p>I thought we knew that already.</p>
<p>Well.  They do.</p>
<p>Next question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hershele Ostropoler</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49389</link>
		<dc:creator>Hershele Ostropoler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49389</guid>
		<description>Er, &quot;less attention than they want,&quot; obviously</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, &#8220;less attention than they want,&#8221; obviously</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hershele Ostropoler</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49387</link>
		<dc:creator>Hershele Ostropoler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49387</guid>
		<description>Decent but shy guys may complain that hey get more attention than they &lt;strong&gt;want&lt;/strong&gt;, but Nice Guys complain they don&#039;t get the attention they &lt;b&gt;deserve&lt;/b&gt;.

Not naming names, but I don&#039;t see why we&#039;re debating whether or not there&#039;s a certain type of behavior guaranteed to get girls, or whether women are arbitrary and if so, if they&#039;re allowed to be, when we first need to settle whether or not women even exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decent but shy guys may complain that hey get more attention than they <strong>want</strong>, but Nice Guys complain they don&#8217;t get the attention they <b>deserve</b>.</p>
<p>Not naming names, but I don&#8217;t see why we&#8217;re debating whether or not there&#8217;s a certain type of behavior guaranteed to get girls, or whether women are arbitrary and if so, if they&#8217;re allowed to be, when we first need to settle whether or not women even exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49319</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49319</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the point I made is anything other than a legitimate question.

I heard a report that somebody claimed to have found a gene for shyness.  That would be interesting.  Apparently, says the practitioner, there are things you can do, if that&#039;s the case, to ameliorate the results, although you&#039;ll never be the life of the party.

I suspect the majority of the shy people we meet are shy of first moves.  If that is overcome in some fashion, things might go reasonably well.

BTW.   I read a few of the most recent comments at Pandagon and discovered they are misrepesenting what I said.  Apparently they do better with arguments they make up than they do with the arguments presented to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the point I made is anything other than a legitimate question.</p>
<p>I heard a report that somebody claimed to have found a gene for shyness.  That would be interesting.  Apparently, says the practitioner, there are things you can do, if that&#8217;s the case, to ameliorate the results, although you&#8217;ll never be the life of the party.</p>
<p>I suspect the majority of the shy people we meet are shy of first moves.  If that is overcome in some fashion, things might go reasonably well.</p>
<p>BTW.   I read a few of the most recent comments at Pandagon and discovered they are misrepesenting what I said.  Apparently they do better with arguments they make up than they do with the arguments presented to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49302</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49302</guid>
		<description>Richard, go back to Pandagon.  Your trolling isn&#039;t welcome here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, go back to Pandagon.  Your trolling isn&#8217;t welcome here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junk science</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49292</link>
		<dc:creator>junk science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49292</guid>
		<description>Oh, Christ, it&#039;s you. I knew I should have remembered to rub that ointment on last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Christ, it&#8217;s you. I knew I should have remembered to rub that ointment on last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49288</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49288</guid>
		<description>Junk.

Rejection.  Unpleasant.  Therefore behaviors which look to be rejected (trying to get to know shy people) are avoided.

Sounds like normal.  Avoid pain.

However, it occurs to me that any effort to get to know a shy person--like making the first move--would either generate a reasonable interchange which might go on from there, or a pathetically grateful explosion of clinginess.  But I don&#039;t see rejection as a likely response.  Has that been your experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Junk.</p>
<p>Rejection.  Unpleasant.  Therefore behaviors which look to be rejected (trying to get to know shy people) are avoided.</p>
<p>Sounds like normal.  Avoid pain.</p>
<p>However, it occurs to me that any effort to get to know a shy person&#8211;like making the first move&#8211;would either generate a reasonable interchange which might go on from there, or a pathetically grateful explosion of clinginess.  But I don&#8217;t see rejection as a likely response.  Has that been your experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junk science</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49282</link>
		<dc:creator>junk science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49282</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And the fact that these decent but shy guys DO exist and get no attention begs the question of why they get no attention, and might there be some behavioral reasoning behind this, is this is a question worth discussing?&lt;/i&gt;

Shy people don&#039;t get attention because it&#039;s hard to get to know them. It has nothing to do with gender or &quot;behavioral reasoning.&quot; It&#039;s intimidating to approach a person who doesn&#039;t act interested, because no one likes to be rejected. It&#039;s really quite simple, and requires no unfounded generalizing about either sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And the fact that these decent but shy guys DO exist and get no attention begs the question of why they get no attention, and might there be some behavioral reasoning behind this, is this is a question worth discussing?</i></p>
<p>Shy people don&#8217;t get attention because it&#8217;s hard to get to know them. It has nothing to do with gender or &#8220;behavioral reasoning.&#8221; It&#8217;s intimidating to approach a person who doesn&#8217;t act interested, because no one likes to be rejected. It&#8217;s really quite simple, and requires no unfounded generalizing about either sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49259</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/12/nice-guys/#comment-49259</guid>
		<description>Alex, for the eleventy-fifth time, READ THE POST. In particular, read the bit I quoted from Foolish Owl, who was also dealing with people who were bound and determined to ignore the capital letters and the quotation marks and all of the flashing neon signs saying WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT RUN-OF-THE-MILL SHY GUYS HERE.  DON&#039;T PERSONALIZE.

&lt;blockquote&gt;What does one have to do to earn your valuable respect? Does this require obedience to all your espoused views. I mean give me a break, in the grand scheme of things, regardless of what you may think of me, I am not that ‘far’ ideologically away from you, and if you aren’t going to treat me with respect, and you are in any way representative of the central advocats of feminism, then we might as well just kiss goodbye ever changing people’s minds. Because you know, the mainstream world might like to be treated with some respect as you attempt to describe why the world they live in is drastically different than they perceive it to be.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You want to know how to earn my respect?  Don&#039;t whine about being disrespected, and don&#039;t do the concern-troll thing. You&#039;re only about the hundredth guy who&#039;s told me that if I don&#039;t coddle him and tone down the anger, I&#039;ll lose all my mainstream support.    Don&#039;t act like I&#039;m only giving you a hard time because you dared to disagree with me rather than because you have steadfastly maintained that I have said things I haven&#039;t or that I didn&#039;t cover issues that I did.

&lt;blockquote&gt;As you could tell if you read my post I completely agree with you, but I also think that there is more at play when guys look around and DO see incentives to being an ‘asshole’. But this is not a worthy topic. OK sure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What&#039;s so interesting about it? It&#039;s not like we don&#039;t know what causes it, an outsized sense of entitlement encouraged by the patriarchy.  The guys you seem to think are just nice guys, no caps or quotes, who have this very interesting transformation into assholes who see women as chess pieces, were assholes all along.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, for the eleventy-fifth time, READ THE POST. In particular, read the bit I quoted from Foolish Owl, who was also dealing with people who were bound and determined to ignore the capital letters and the quotation marks and all of the flashing neon signs saying WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT RUN-OF-THE-MILL SHY GUYS HERE.  DON&#8217;T PERSONALIZE.</p>
<blockquote><p>What does one have to do to earn your valuable respect? Does this require obedience to all your espoused views. I mean give me a break, in the grand scheme of things, regardless of what you may think of me, I am not that ‘far’ ideologically away from you, and if you aren’t going to treat me with respect, and you are in any way representative of the central advocats of feminism, then we might as well just kiss goodbye ever changing people’s minds. Because you know, the mainstream world might like to be treated with some respect as you attempt to describe why the world they live in is drastically different than they perceive it to be.</p></blockquote>
<p>You want to know how to earn my respect?  Don&#8217;t whine about being disrespected, and don&#8217;t do the concern-troll thing. You&#8217;re only about the hundredth guy who&#8217;s told me that if I don&#8217;t coddle him and tone down the anger, I&#8217;ll lose all my mainstream support.    Don&#8217;t act like I&#8217;m only giving you a hard time because you dared to disagree with me rather than because you have steadfastly maintained that I have said things I haven&#8217;t or that I didn&#8217;t cover issues that I did.</p>
<blockquote><p>As you could tell if you read my post I completely agree with you, but I also think that there is more at play when guys look around and DO see incentives to being an ‘asshole’. But this is not a worthy topic. OK sure.</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s so interesting about it? It&#8217;s not like we don&#8217;t know what causes it, an outsized sense of entitlement encouraged by the patriarchy.  The guys you seem to think are just nice guys, no caps or quotes, who have this very interesting transformation into assholes who see women as chess pieces, were assholes all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 00:30:26 -->
