Comments on: The New India http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/ In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: JC http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53716 JC Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:39:53 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53716 The Socialist Government caused India to be one of the poorest nations in the world for almost 50 years. Finally the governmant liberalizes and some sort of an economy pops up and people actually want to revert to to old ways? India does need to develop a manufacturing industry in order to help the poor masses with no jobs but they also need to expect that it will be a long hard road as it struggles to form an economy that is on par with the world leaders. Seeing growth in the economic sector is an amazing thing and it will help to raise the standard of living for all the people in the long run, not just the rich(for example look at the US's standard of living for the poor, amazing compared to a third world country). They need to liberalize as much as possible and fight the communists and socialists at every step unless they want 100 million more of their citizens to be living on less than a dollar a day. The Socialist Government caused India to be one of the poorest nations in the world for almost 50 years. Finally the governmant liberalizes and some sort of an economy pops up and people actually want to revert to to old ways? India does need to develop a manufacturing industry in order to help the poor masses with no jobs but they also need to expect that it will be a long hard road as it struggles to form an economy that is on par with the world leaders. Seeing growth in the economic sector is an amazing thing and it will help to raise the standard of living for all the people in the long run, not just the rich(for example look at the US’s standard of living for the poor, amazing compared to a third world country). They need to liberalize as much as possible and fight the communists and socialists at every step unless they want 100 million more of their citizens to be living on less than a dollar a day.

]]> By: V Ramaswamy http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53446 V Ramaswamy Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:26:47 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53446 Hullo Came upon your blog. Nice read. You might like to visit this blog out of Calcutta: cuckooscall.blogspot.com best rama Hullo

Came upon your blog. Nice read.

You might like to visit this blog out of Calcutta:

cuckooscall.blogspot.com

best

rama

]]> By: Joy http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53316 Joy Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:00:15 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53316 This articles hits the heart of the issue of the significance of India's progress applied through the country. Our progress and economic prosperity should trickle down to all walks of life, and not to the 0.1% of the population. Right now, the rich are getting richer, and poor are staying poor. The politics is masking their failure through claims of psuedo-prosperity. We need a complete overhaul of our political system to make pending changes to improve the condition of the impoverished. This articles hits the heart of the issue of the significance of India’s progress applied through the country. Our progress and economic prosperity should trickle down to all walks of life, and not to the 0.1% of the population. Right now, the rich are getting richer, and poor are staying poor. The politics is masking their failure through claims of psuedo-prosperity. We need a complete overhaul of our political system to make pending changes to improve the condition of the impoverished.

]]> By: indian http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53300 indian Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:58:32 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53300 This is a very wrong perception. Any economy, nomatter how large or small has strata. Take any city in the world. There are the utter poor [those who live off of soup kitchens and donations ] homeless , squatters etc. There is crime. It transcends to the smallest of Villages too. And If you look carefully Americans are not that much richer. They just have access to more variety in their purchase choices. More than half of the country doesnt have proepr health care. It is ridiculous how people start analyzing China and India as if they were some alien economies with weird behaviors. -anon. indian This is a very wrong perception. Any economy, nomatter how large or small has strata.
Take any city in the world. There are the utter poor [those who live off of soup kitchens and donations ] homeless , squatters etc.
There is crime. It transcends to the smallest of Villages too.
And If you look carefully Americans are not that much richer. They just have access to more variety in their purchase choices. More than half of the country doesnt have proepr health care.
It is ridiculous how people start analyzing China and India as if they were some alien economies with weird behaviors.
-anon. indian

]]> By: Neil http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53062 Neil Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:33:24 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-53062 <blockquote>Celebrating success is important. But buying into myths of universal success, without taking steps to improve the situation fo everyone, is dangerous.</blockquote> Is there any example of universal success ... ever? India is a country of well over one billion people, 2/3 of which live in villages. Though rural in the technical sense, these villages embrace a backward form of economic and cultural life that makes progress a tad difficult. Walk through any of these villages and you'll see hundreds of able-bodied men just sitting around, doing nothing, unemployment running rampant. If there is any other suggested solution to creating a half-billion jobs, aside from going through with market reforms, I'd like to hear it. Otherwise, India is doing pretty well considering it had been shooting itself in the foot for 40 years with some ill-branded protectionism, with a tad of waffling on the Cold War, not to mention having fought four wars and dealt with unending communal strife. Like I said, I'd like to hear more about what India can do to help out the people that are being left behind and how this apparently runs counter to the current market reforms.

Celebrating success is important. But buying into myths of universal success, without taking steps to improve the situation fo everyone, is dangerous.

Is there any example of universal success … ever? India is a country of well over one billion people, 2/3 of which live in villages. Though rural in the technical sense, these villages embrace a backward form of economic and cultural life that makes progress a tad difficult.

Walk through any of these villages and you’ll see hundreds of able-bodied men just sitting around, doing nothing, unemployment running rampant. If there is any other suggested solution to creating a half-billion jobs, aside from going through with market reforms, I’d like to hear it. Otherwise, India is doing pretty well considering it had been shooting itself in the foot for 40 years with some ill-branded protectionism, with a tad of waffling on the Cold War, not to mention having fought four wars and dealt with unending communal strife.

Like I said, I’d like to hear more about what India can do to help out the people that are being left behind and how this apparently runs counter to the current market reforms.

]]> By: Francis http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-52915 Francis Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:18:26 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-52915 I seem to recall that the Economist divides China into two for the purposes of many "per capita" sorts of question. The first half consists of the prosperous coastal provinces, the second consists of all the inland (poor) provinces. From memory the first is not far off (S) Korean levels of economy while the second is fighting it out with Laos and Myanmar for poorest East Asian state. I seem to recall that the Economist divides China into two for the purposes of many “per capita” sorts of question. The first half consists of the prosperous coastal provinces, the second consists of all the inland (poor) provinces. From memory the first is not far off (S) Korean levels of economy while the second is fighting it out with Laos and Myanmar for poorest East Asian state.

]]> By: SPIIDERWEB™ http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-52910 SPIIDERWEB™ Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:26:10 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/07/06/the-new-india/#comment-52910 Ah, but you see, those people don't matter. Government doesn't care about the great unwashed hordes. And much of India's success has come from US companies off-loading jobs which is creating more poverty in the US. Damn the wealthy with their don't give a shit attitudes. Ah, but you see, those people don’t matter. Government doesn’t care about the great unwashed hordes. And much of India’s success has come from US companies off-loading jobs which is creating more poverty in the US.

Damn the wealthy with their don’t give a shit attitudes.

]]>