Yeah, no fucking way a jet plane full of fuel could have exploded or anything. Or the fuel tanks in the city command bunker in WTC 7 could have caught fire or nothin’.

It’s just a distraction allowed by those that placed the explosives in the weeks and months prior to the well known plan to attack the US (PDB, remember?).

Obviously.

Hold your head up proudly.

NO ONE can dispute that BILLIONS were made “shorting” United, American, and Marsh Associates stock, way, WAY above normal levels (like 1000% more) the week leading up to 9/11/01. Just google it and see the FBI agents statements that investigated it.

OF COURSE explosives were used to bring down the three buildings.

All one has to do is THINK: HOW can a gravity collapse (Government official theory, Jet fuel melted support steel, blah blah blah, causing a pancake collapse, blah blah blah) cause I-Beams weighing more than school buses to be EJECTED 600 feet from the towers, in a video observed arc?

Answer: CAN NOT.

Good on ya for being honest with yourself.

Looking back a year later at “Bush on a Plane” : A flyover president and his broken promises. It’s frightening that this guy has more than two years left in office, two more years to fly from here to there, posturing to his heart’s content, while the country goes to hell.

Countering fear mongering requires that people demonstrate courage. Fear is insidious because it is much easier to lead people to be afraid than to lead them to be courageous (as John Kerry discovered).

The good news is that courageous people can accomplish a lot. With the right leaders in 2004 and 2006 this could be the beginning of an exciting time for progressives. Ironically we’ll have King George’s startling incompetence, in part, to thank for that.

I believe that there were explosives in the twin towers, and that explosives led to the collapse of building 7.

I keep these beliefs to myself, for the most part. When I express these beliefs, I tend to get attacked from the left AND right. And most of the people who criticize my theories just don’t have the facts. They just say something about “wacko conspiracy theorists” and leave it at that. They don’t bother to look at history, or even contemporary political thought, for evidence that people might find attacking their own nation justifiable. I think about the Reichstag fire, about Pearl Harbor, and just have to think…

Just wait for the next terrorist attack and the subsequent martial law. I hope I’ve acquired enough in savings to leave the US before then.

Bush is and always has been a puppet, driven by those unelected actors behind the scenes who’ve been waiting to get their hands on the wheel for years.

Katrina blew into the theatre of the ‘Let’s Play Whitehouse’ marionette show. Dumb, wooden and without his own mind, our hapless leader was left to dangle precariously, hung by props of a one-act play that didn’t fit the scene.

As a semi-aside, ever notice that any time the issue of terrorism comes up, the Republicans get more popular? It doesn’t matter how the issue comes up: fail to prevent an attack (a la 9/11, the London subway bombings, and the anthrax letters)–up in the polls. Prevent an attack or claim to (a la the recent liquids on planes scare)–up in the polls. If the republicans are losing the 2008 election and there’s a terrorist attack, I’d consider conspiracy theories about it much more seriously than I normally would.