Author: has written 1136 posts for this blog.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

15 Responses

  1. Blitzgal
    Blitzgal August 30, 2006 at 1:43 pm |

    What the hell did they do to her jawline?!

  2. Natalia
    Natalia August 30, 2006 at 1:58 pm |

    Yeah, I mean, what the hell was she thinking? How DARE she appear on TV and other media if her looks don’t correspond 100% to whatever latest restrictions the fashion world/editors of Details have graciously imposed?!?!?!

    That swine!

  3. Nomie
    Nomie August 30, 2006 at 1:59 pm |

    She has dead eyes. *shiver*

  4. ole blue
    ole blue August 30, 2006 at 2:13 pm |

    “”An “overzealous” photo editor “”

    I bet they told the editor to make Couric look sexier because you know the only way people will watch the news these days is if the anchors are beautiful. Just look at the “blonde” network CNN.

    There is something wrong with her eyes. She looks like she is on drugs. Maybe that is what they are trying to hide at CBS. I meaN ANYONE THAT SMILES LIKE THAT HAS TO BE ON SOMETHING.

    But of course I digressed and hit the caps lock key.

    It is sad that a woman who is not over weight has a photograph of her manipulated to fit an “ideal”. Perhaps CBS is tired of being called the old people’s network. Look out David Letterman you are about to get fired!

  5. Ginger
    Ginger August 30, 2006 at 2:51 pm |

    Look out David Letterman you are about to get fired!

    The Davester can get as old as he wants; he’s a dude.

  6. Scott Lemieux
    Scott Lemieux August 30, 2006 at 2:56 pm |

    Christ. DO they alter pictures of Chris Matthews?

  7. Regina
    Regina August 30, 2006 at 3:27 pm |

    Well, if they do, he’s sure not looking any sexier…

  8. Cindy
    Cindy August 30, 2006 at 4:07 pm |

    It’s going to be hard for us women to think clearly if we’re expected to starve ourselves . . . maybe that’s the conspiracy!!! If she’s that hungry from attempting to conform to impossible media standards, then puppet string will be that much easier to pull! Ha! Those tricky network execs . . .

  9. Jack Ketch
    Jack Ketch August 30, 2006 at 4:19 pm |

    They looked into that terrifying, shark-like visage and decided that her weight needed alteration?

  10. Caja
    Caja August 30, 2006 at 5:48 pm |

    This is starting to make me think of “Harrison Bergeron,” only slightly less creepy.

  11. The Heretik  » Blog Archive   » Dumb and Dumber Update

    […] al pic. “There’s more of me to love.” Plus more from the non plussed on what is and is not plus sized.

    This […]

  12. Sophist
    Sophist August 30, 2006 at 8:47 pm |

    What’s the point of doctoring that photo, anyway? Everyone will be too distracted by her “Man Who Laughs” rictus to notice the pounds they scraped off.

  13. Maureen
    Maureen August 31, 2006 at 1:32 pm |

    What really disturbs me about the photos, both original and doctored, is the way that they have posed her face such that she is doing the “diminutive woman” head tip rather than looking us straight in the eyes the way photos typically portray “strong, authoritative” men.

  14. firefalluk
    firefalluk September 1, 2006 at 8:11 am |

    Christ. DO they alter pictures of Chris Matthews?

    Only to tipex out the horns, tail, and fangs. And possibly the other ass (the one he talks out of, I guess)

Comments are closed.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.