Comments on: That Pig Picture Was No Fluke http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/ In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set. Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:56 +0000 hourly 1 By: firefalluk http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62253 firefalluk Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:11:47 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62253 <blockquote>Christ. DO they alter pictures of Chris Matthews?</blockquote> Only to tipex out the horns, tail, and fangs. And possibly the other ass (the one he talks out of, I guess)

Christ. DO they alter pictures of Chris Matthews?

Only to tipex out the horns, tail, and fangs. And possibly the other ass (the one he talks out of, I guess)

]]> By: Maureen http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62186 Maureen Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:32:10 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62186 What really disturbs me about the photos, both original and doctored, is the way that they have posed her face such that she is doing the "diminutive woman" head tip rather than looking us straight in the eyes the way photos typically portray "strong, authoritative" men. What really disturbs me about the photos, both original and doctored, is the way that they have posed her face such that she is doing the “diminutive woman” head tip rather than looking us straight in the eyes the way photos typically portray “strong, authoritative” men.

]]> By: zuzu http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62121 zuzu Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:59:27 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62121 You know, she does look a lot like Fire Marshal Bill in that doctored photo. You know, she does look a lot like Fire Marshal Bill in that doctored photo.

]]> By: Sophist http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62120 Sophist Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:47:30 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62120 What's the point of doctoring <em>that</em> photo, anyway? Everyone will be too distracted by her "Man Who Laughs" rictus to notice the pounds they scraped off. What’s the point of doctoring that photo, anyway? Everyone will be too distracted by her “Man Who Laughs” rictus to notice the pounds they scraped off.

]]> By: The Heretik » Blog Archive » Dumb and Dumber Update http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62112 The Heretik » Blog Archive » Dumb and Dumber Update Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:38:24 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62112 [...] al pic. “There’s more of me to love.” Plus more from the non plussed on what is and is not plus sized. This [...] [...] al pic. “There’s more of me to love.” Plus more from the non plussed on what is and is not plus sized.

This [...]

]]> By: Caja http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62102 Caja Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:48:12 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62102 This is starting to make me think of "Harrison Bergeron," only slightly less creepy. This is starting to make me think of “Harrison Bergeron,” only slightly less creepy.

]]> By: Jack Ketch http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62093 Jack Ketch Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:19:32 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62093 They looked into that terrifying, shark-like visage and decided that her <em>weight</em> needed alteration? They looked into that terrifying, shark-like visage and decided that her weight needed alteration?

]]> By: Cindy http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62092 Cindy Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:07:14 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62092 It's going to be hard for us women to think clearly if we're expected to starve ourselves . . . maybe that's the conspiracy!!! If she's that hungry from attempting to conform to impossible media standards, then puppet string will be that much easier to pull! Ha! Those tricky network execs . . . It’s going to be hard for us women to think clearly if we’re expected to starve ourselves . . . maybe that’s the conspiracy!!! If she’s that hungry from attempting to conform to impossible media standards, then puppet string will be that much easier to pull! Ha! Those tricky network execs . . .

]]> By: Regina http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62087 Regina Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:27:58 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62087 Well, if they do, he's sure not looking any sexier... Well, if they do, he’s sure not looking any sexier…

]]> By: Scott Lemieux http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62084 Scott Lemieux Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:56:19 +0000 http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/08/30/that-pig-picture-was-no-fluke/#comment-62084 Christ. DO they alter pictures of Chris Matthews? Christ. DO they alter pictures of Chris Matthews?

]]>