<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wherein Ann Althouse Shoots Any Credibility She Had Left</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: wildstarryskies</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64674</link>
		<dc:creator>wildstarryskies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64674</guid>
		<description>
*blush*

I looked at the picture, thought, &quot;Looks like a nice group of bloggers&quot;, then looked again, and thought, &quot;Oooh, who&#039;s that hottie?&quot;, right there at ya, Jessica. 

But not ONCE did I think you were posing or thought even less of you!  My next thought was, &quot;Oooh, Jessica of Feministing is a hottie.  KEWL.&quot; 

OMG this brings us to a verry important conclusion:

A woman can be: 

1. A hottie
2. Smart
3. A heckuva blogger 
and 4. a kick-ass feminist to boot.

Gosh, who knew? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*blush*</p>
<p>I looked at the picture, thought, &#8220;Looks like a nice group of bloggers&#8221;, then looked again, and thought, &#8220;Oooh, who&#8217;s that hottie?&#8221;, right there at ya, Jessica. </p>
<p>But not ONCE did I think you were posing or thought even less of you!  My next thought was, &#8220;Oooh, Jessica of Feministing is a hottie.  KEWL.&#8221; </p>
<p>OMG this brings us to a verry important conclusion:</p>
<p>A woman can be: </p>
<p>1. A hottie<br />
2. Smart<br />
3. A heckuva blogger<br />
and 4. a kick-ass feminist to boot.</p>
<p>Gosh, who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64462</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Putting the Word Breasts in This Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

I began to wonder if Professor Althouse and Dr. Smith weren&#039;t engaging in a little cyberbullying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Putting the Word Breasts in This Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I began to wonder if Professor Althouse and Dr. Smith weren&#8217;t engaging in a little cyberbullying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the oh zone &#187; Controversy: bodies - everyone has one: a blog that hurts</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64351</link>
		<dc:creator>the oh zone &#187; Controversy: bodies - everyone has one: a blog that hurts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64351</guid>
		<description>[...]  is the kind of silly journalism that came about - like I said, on both sides.  (although Jill&#8217;s post on femin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  is the kind of silly journalism that came about &#8211; like I said, on both sides.  (although Jill&#8217;s post on femin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia Antonova</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64314</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalia Antonova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64314</guid>
		<description>[...] ue my brain cells.  I had to pop over and have a look, though, when Ms. Althouse accused a prominent feminist blogger of&#8230; what  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ue my brain cells.  I had to pop over and have a look, though, when Ms. Althouse accused a prominent feminist blogger of&#8230; what  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Kane's Notables</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Kane's Notables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64291</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ode To Ann Althouse&lt;/strong&gt;

Poor Ann Althouse! Jessica Valenti looked discernibly female in a blogger group photo with Bill Clinton, and Ann is aghast, appalled, and dismayed!  Ann deserves a limerick, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ode To Ann Althouse</strong></p>
<p>Poor Ann Althouse! Jessica Valenti looked discernibly female in a blogger group photo with Bill Clinton, and Ann is aghast, appalled, and dismayed!  Ann deserves a limerick, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuomas</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64288</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64288</guid>
		<description>To clarify: I think what Althouse did was wrong, and quite comical, too. I probably would find it more infuriating than funny if I were a woman, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify: I think what Althouse did was wrong, and quite comical, too. I probably would find it more infuriating than funny if I were a woman, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuomas</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64287</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64287</guid>
		<description>What the hell? 

OMG, breasts!

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell? </p>
<p>OMG, breasts!</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Shrub.com Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Yet Another Take on the Althouse Incident</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64262</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Shrub.com Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Yet Another Take on the Althouse Incident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64262</guid>
		<description>[...] ves/005716.html&quot;&gt;Jessica @ Feministing:  The &#8220;dirty pillow&#8221; line of attack Jill @ Feministe:  Wherein Ann Althouse Sh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ves/005716.html&#8221;&gt;Jessica @ Feministing:  The &#8220;dirty pillow&#8221; line of attack Jill @ Feministe:  Wherein Ann Althouse Sh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64230</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64230</guid>
		<description>&gt;I noticed that question, too, and I do think that it’s worthy of consideration. Given the general context, however, I suspect that the question is intended to be an anti-Clinton canard rather than start a serious discussion thread on feminism.&gt;

You know, I&#039;m not his biggest fan these days either (for reasons mostly unrelated to MonicaGate), but I honestly wouldn&#039;t even go that far:  it&#039;s not a terrifically valid or at least interesting question, no, in my book.  it&#039;s perfectly obvious what she&#039;s doing there; he&#039;s an EX-PRESIDENT.  It&#039;s an honor, for fuckssake.  Yah, I think Clinton&#039;s at minimum behaved in rather irresponsible ways, and no, at the end of the day i don&#039;t know how much veracity there is to the other harassment stories--and once again having to reiterate that consensual adultery, even with a young intern, =! &quot;harassment.&quot;  Not a really swell or ethical idea on many levels, sure, and that goes triple for his weaselling and leaving her hanging out to dry when the flying monkeys came; but of course the REALLY disgusting part came from the flying monkeys themselves...

But I mean, really:  what really sucks (pun probably intended) about the residual odor from that whole TIRED goddam mess is that even among people who pretty much know better, the general aura of &quot;Clinton=perv, somehow more sinister or at least beyond the pale than any other goddam politician.&quot;  The flying monkeys really did a good job, here.  And it&#039;s the same exact fucking thing they&#039;d like to happen with Jessica: fling enough shit and some will stick.  

Which is why there simply cannot be enough piling on for this odious behavior.  Take it right back to the place where you got it; you cain&#039;t leave a bit of it in here.  And THEN some.  

so, back to Clinton and rightness of a feminist meeting with him:  irrelevant.  Even if you -do- think the worst of his behavior in office.  Listen, I wouldn&#039;t have faulted her for going to lunch with GHWH Bush, either; or any other current or former President, none of whom perhaps exempting Jimmy Carter is/was exactly a saint.  (current Fearless Leader/sonny boy, I would probably make an exception, but you know it&#039;s cuz i feel REALLY strongly that he is in fact the Debbil; others&#039; mileage may vary on even that, and i -might- have trouble really arguing with them for something like this) This is what people do.  You don&#039;t have to be ideologically or ethically married to the guy to accept that it is an honor and, well, accept.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I noticed that question, too, and I do think that it’s worthy of consideration. Given the general context, however, I suspect that the question is intended to be an anti-Clinton canard rather than start a serious discussion thread on feminism.&gt;</p>
<p>You know, I&#8217;m not his biggest fan these days either (for reasons mostly unrelated to MonicaGate), but I honestly wouldn&#8217;t even go that far:  it&#8217;s not a terrifically valid or at least interesting question, no, in my book.  it&#8217;s perfectly obvious what she&#8217;s doing there; he&#8217;s an EX-PRESIDENT.  It&#8217;s an honor, for fuckssake.  Yah, I think Clinton&#8217;s at minimum behaved in rather irresponsible ways, and no, at the end of the day i don&#8217;t know how much veracity there is to the other harassment stories&#8211;and once again having to reiterate that consensual adultery, even with a young intern, =! &#8220;harassment.&#8221;  Not a really swell or ethical idea on many levels, sure, and that goes triple for his weaselling and leaving her hanging out to dry when the flying monkeys came; but of course the REALLY disgusting part came from the flying monkeys themselves&#8230;</p>
<p>But I mean, really:  what really sucks (pun probably intended) about the residual odor from that whole TIRED goddam mess is that even among people who pretty much know better, the general aura of &#8220;Clinton=perv, somehow more sinister or at least beyond the pale than any other goddam politician.&#8221;  The flying monkeys really did a good job, here.  And it&#8217;s the same exact fucking thing they&#8217;d like to happen with Jessica: fling enough shit and some will stick.  </p>
<p>Which is why there simply cannot be enough piling on for this odious behavior.  Take it right back to the place where you got it; you cain&#8217;t leave a bit of it in here.  And THEN some.  </p>
<p>so, back to Clinton and rightness of a feminist meeting with him:  irrelevant.  Even if you -do- think the worst of his behavior in office.  Listen, I wouldn&#8217;t have faulted her for going to lunch with GHWH Bush, either; or any other current or former President, none of whom perhaps exempting Jimmy Carter is/was exactly a saint.  (current Fearless Leader/sonny boy, I would probably make an exception, but you know it&#8217;s cuz i feel REALLY strongly that he is in fact the Debbil; others&#8217; mileage may vary on even that, and i -might- have trouble really arguing with them for something like this) This is what people do.  You don&#8217;t have to be ideologically or ethically married to the guy to accept that it is an honor and, well, accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64221</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/09/15/wherein-ann-althouse-shoots-any-credibility-she-had-left/#comment-64221</guid>
		<description>Ann Althouse had credibility?

Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Althouse had credibility?</p>
<p>Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 08:47:30 -->
