It’s too bad she takes a shot to the chest in the end, as a facial would have made this home porno even hotter.

which I found distasteful at the time. Come on the body is different than come on the face (and apparently I’m not the only one who feels that way). I’ve had both done and felt much worse after come on the face. I found this comment to be so disturbing that I had to talk to my husband to make sure not all men are like that.

Just thought I would clarify that while Keith Olbermann is making cracks about come on Paris Hilton’s face there’s no such video showing such.

I was looking to send it on, but I can’t find any contact information from him.

Anyway, the note I’d have attached is, “Dear Mr. Olbermann,
Your requests for apologies for mean and hurtful words are eloquent. You always understand that insults don’t only hurt those they were directed at, but that insults create an ENVIRONMENT that hurts even more people.

“However, everyone makes mistakes, and this time, I feel that you have said something–will hurt more than the one person you insulted. The way you described being punched in the face versus being come upon while engaging in consensual sex is very dangerous. It disintegrates boundaries between what “good men” do and what “bad men” do. By implying that an act done by a man to a woman can only have one version–the bad version–you confuse people who look at their own consensual face-dripping incidents and start to see themselves as “naughty,” yet since they did it without any conscience pangs, it must be a natural part of them. And once you make a person feel that all of a certain type of behavior that they were doing one form of anyway is bad, then they’re not going to avoid it to be good: you simply risk pushing people over to not caring to avoid the truly bad behavior!

I’ve done a terrible job adding to this beautiful blog entry, but please see blogger “Jill’s” comments on:
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/11/note-to-lauren-dtmfa/

I believe–I truly believe after watching your special commentaries about the importance of avoiding conditioning people to think badly–that you’ll side with Ms. Jill when you read her work.

Thank you,
Katie

Honestly, I’d rather be punched in the face than being cum on the face by a guy.

Can’t we just dump ALL of ‘em and start over?

Maybe then we’ll actually get some relevant information and some depth to our news.

Okay, maybe that second wish is asking for too much.

And I say this as someone who’s noticed a definite uptick in requests to come on my face in recent years.

/restarting derail

As have I. And my current bf asked after he started watching porn. Monkey see, monkey want to do. I’ve since banned porn from the house. (not because of this instance alone)

But hey, his bosses are forcing him! He’s powerless to resist! In all other arenas, he is to be revered as the lone rebel voice in the wilderness, but when it comes to Lindsay’s undies and Sharon’s aging privates, he’s the victim!

I find it really hard to believe that anyone forces him to cover celebrity news. He’s allowed to say whatever he wants on political issues and perpetually mock Bill O’Reilly (who deserves nothing but mocking), but he’s forced to do stories about Lindsay Lohan and Sharon Stone? Yeah, right.

He is doing important work and making sure he isn’t replaced by some right-wing tool like Tucker Carlson or Joe Scarborough is more important than ideological purity right now.

See, the problem is, it’s always “right now.”

And I say this as someone who’s noticed a definite uptick in requests to come on my face in recent years.

\start_{derail}
no way, really? have other single women noticed this? I’ve never had anyone ask me for that, but I’ve been in longterm, monogamous, mostly porn-free relationships for the last several years, so I’ve missed out on recent sexual trends. (thank dog)
\end_{derail}

but it should be pointed out that the eroticisation of degrading the “bottom” in gay porn is at least in part erotic because you’re treating him like a woman

I feel it is patronising to homosexual guys to tell them that their sexual dynamics revolve around a women substitute. Even with the disclaimer of “at least in part” which goes no where to clear things up and seems just intended to remove conviction of the claim.