<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Godbag of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-73339</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-73339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Satan sees women as half his soldiers. You’re my messenger in necessity, Satan tells women you‘re my weapon to bring down any stubborn man. There are men that I fail with. But you’re the best of my weapons.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the other half would be…? No, couldn’t be men. Probably cats. Those pesky little soldiers of Satan, always satanically playing with balls of wool and drinking saucers of milk… 

Actually I would read it as &quot;a woman is half human and half Satan&#039;s soldier&quot; or starts out as already being halfway to hell. It fits well with the rest of the comment about using a woman on a stubborn man, someone he&#039;s not able to budge without help. The quote would be &quot;Satan sees women as half &lt;b&gt;of&lt;/b&gt; his soldiers.&quot; to mean it the way you&#039;re thinking based on your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><i>“Satan sees women as half his soldiers. You’re my messenger in necessity, Satan tells women you‘re my weapon to bring down any stubborn man. There are men that I fail with. But you’re the best of my weapons.”</i></p></blockquote>
<p>And the other half would be…? No, couldn’t be men. Probably cats. Those pesky little soldiers of Satan, always satanically playing with balls of wool and drinking saucers of milk… </p>
<p>Actually I would read it as &#8220;a woman is half human and half Satan&#8217;s soldier&#8221; or starts out as already being halfway to hell. It fits well with the rest of the comment about using a woman on a stubborn man, someone he&#8217;s not able to budge without help. The quote would be &#8220;Satan sees women as half <b>of</b> his soldiers.&#8221; to mean it the way you&#8217;re thinking based on your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72135</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72135</guid>
		<description>I heart his &quot;clarification.&quot;

&quot;However the Sheikh later clarified his comments, telling the newspaper he only meant to refer to prostitutes as meat, and not any scantily clad woman without a hijab.&quot;

So if you put a rental sign on the meat and someone steals it ... no, wait, I&#039;m still confused by the mysterious person who put the meat out in the first place. It&#039;s not the woman, because she&#039;s the meat and you can&#039;t really be both the actor and the object. It&#039;s not the rapist, because he&#039;s an innocent kitty. Are we down to blaming God for the meat&#039;s being out there? Terrible thing for a religious leader to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heart his &#8220;clarification.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;However the Sheikh later clarified his comments, telling the newspaper he only meant to refer to prostitutes as meat, and not any scantily clad woman without a hijab.&#8221;</p>
<p>So if you put a rental sign on the meat and someone steals it &#8230; no, wait, I&#8217;m still confused by the mysterious person who put the meat out in the first place. It&#8217;s not the woman, because she&#8217;s the meat and you can&#8217;t really be both the actor and the object. It&#8217;s not the rapist, because he&#8217;s an innocent kitty. Are we down to blaming God for the meat&#8217;s being out there? Terrible thing for a religious leader to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72101</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72101</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, men have brains smaller than those of cats?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Those men apparently and it is up to the woman to protect them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, men have brains smaller than those of cats?</p></blockquote>
<p>Those men apparently and it is up to the woman to protect them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: car</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72081</link>
		<dc:creator>car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72081</guid>
		<description>So, men have brains smaller than those of cats? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, men have brains smaller than those of cats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72068</guid>
		<description>Answer: All of you is the meat.

Answer 2: Men can&#039;t be raped.

Answer 3: That would never happen because men&#039;s bodies aren&#039;t naturally tempting like women&#039;s are, and because women possess a passive sexuality and men possess an aggressive one. Can&#039;t help it, it&#039;s nature!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer: All of you is the meat.</p>
<p>Answer 2: Men can&#8217;t be raped.</p>
<p>Answer 3: That would never happen because men&#8217;s bodies aren&#8217;t naturally tempting like women&#8217;s are, and because women possess a passive sexuality and men possess an aggressive one. Can&#8217;t help it, it&#8217;s nature!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haystacks</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72062</link>
		<dc:creator>Haystacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72062</guid>
		<description>wait...are my breasts the meat, or is all of me the meat?

And If I grab a guy, knock him unconious, and rape him with my dildo, it&#039;s ok right?  I mean, he should not have tempeted me with his sexy sexy manliness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait&#8230;are my breasts the meat, or is all of me the meat?</p>
<p>And If I grab a guy, knock him unconious, and rape him with my dildo, it&#8217;s ok right?  I mean, he should not have tempeted me with his sexy sexy manliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhiannon</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72059</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhiannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72059</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Actualy the worst part was where he said the judges who gave the “cats” 50 years of jail time were lacking in mercy, because it was the fault of the meat, obviously&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to denegrate *real* cats or anything but isn&#039;t it also debasing of men to refer to them as animals with no self control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Actualy the worst part was where he said the judges who gave the “cats” 50 years of jail time were lacking in mercy, because it was the fault of the meat, obviously</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to denegrate *real* cats or anything but isn&#8217;t it also debasing of men to refer to them as animals with no self control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roonie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72028</link>
		<dc:creator>Roonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72028</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won’t get it.”&lt;/i&gt;

Fucking WORST analogy EVER.  My gawd.  Nothing short of appalling.  My eyes bulged about three feet out of my head when I read this for the first time.  I can&#039;t seem to get over the shock of such statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won’t get it.”</i></p>
<p>Fucking WORST analogy EVER.  My gawd.  Nothing short of appalling.  My eyes bulged about three feet out of my head when I read this for the first time.  I can&#8217;t seem to get over the shock of such statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roonie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72027</link>
		<dc:creator>Roonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72027</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won’t get it.”

Fucking WORST analogy ever.  My GAWD.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won’t get it.”</p>
<p>Fucking WORST analogy ever.  My GAWD.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little light</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72021</link>
		<dc:creator>little light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/10/26/godbag-of-the-week/#comment-72021</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s gratifying to see the way this jerk&#039;s community is putting him on the curb.  It looks like he&#039;s being stripped of his congregation and his cred, and run out on a rail, as well he should.
And other local leaders have already stepped up not only to call his comments on women vile, but to point out that he&#039;s casting men as animals, too.  I hope they get a better imam soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s gratifying to see the way this jerk&#8217;s community is putting him on the curb.  It looks like he&#8217;s being stripped of his congregation and his cred, and run out on a rail, as well he should.<br />
And other local leaders have already stepped up not only to call his comments on women vile, but to point out that he&#8217;s casting men as animals, too.  I hope they get a better imam soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 02:57:24 -->
