<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good Wife&#8217;s Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75809</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75809</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know this kind of thing is looking pretty good to some women, after all did you see MP Dunleavey&#039;s MSN Money article entitled &quot;Secret Lives of Breadwinner Wives&quot;.  Seems MP and her Women in Red are kind of not liking the traditional male role of primary breadwinner.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know this kind of thing is looking pretty good to some women, after all did you see MP Dunleavey&#8217;s MSN Money article entitled &#8220;Secret Lives of Breadwinner Wives&#8221;.  Seems MP and her Women in Red are kind of not liking the traditional male role of primary breadwinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75808</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75808</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know this kind of thing is looking pretty good to some women, after all did you see MP Dunleavey&#039;s MSN Money article entitled &quot;Secret Lives of Breadwinner Wives&quot;.  Seems MP and her Women in Red are kind of not liking the traditional male role of primary breadwinner.  I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know this kind of thing is looking pretty good to some women, after all did you see MP Dunleavey&#8217;s MSN Money article entitled &#8220;Secret Lives of Breadwinner Wives&#8221;.  Seems MP and her Women in Red are kind of not liking the traditional male role of primary breadwinner.  I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmc90</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75640</link>
		<dc:creator>bmc90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75640</guid>
		<description>Actually I love this list even though it&#039;s fake. When it gets trotted out, as it usually does every so often, I sigh and say, &quot;Yep, this is what I wish my husband would do before I get home.&quot;  What is sad is that if you read Get to Work and the studies it was based on, what&#039;s on this list more or less remains the expectation for women in a lot of households.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I love this list even though it&#8217;s fake. When it gets trotted out, as it usually does every so often, I sigh and say, &#8220;Yep, this is what I wish my husband would do before I get home.&#8221;  What is sad is that if you read Get to Work and the studies it was based on, what&#8217;s on this list more or less remains the expectation for women in a lot of households.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maud</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75585</link>
		<dc:creator>Maud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75585</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://maudnewton.com/blog/?p=6813&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; a direct link to the post with the Lysol ad.  Unbelievable, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://maudnewton.com/blog/?p=6813" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s</a> a direct link to the post with the Lysol ad.  Unbelievable, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75567</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75567</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, it was. You can find a fantastically horrifying ad about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maudnewton.com/blog/?cat=17&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. (You have to scroll down a bit to see it) A quick google search didn&#039;t turn up any stats, but I&#039;ve heard before there were cases of women dying because of it. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;When these devices &lt;em&gt;(referring to birth control devices)&lt;/em&gt; were declared illegal, the flourishing trade simply began selling them as &quot;hygiene&quot; products. For example, vaginal sponges were sold to protect women from &quot;germs&quot; instead of sperm. This led to misleading if not downright fraudulent advertising. From 1930 until 1960, the most popular female contraceptive was Lysol disinfectant -- advertised as a feminine hygiene product in ads featuring testimonials from prominent European &quot;doctors.&quot; Later investigation by the American Medical Association showed that these experts did not exist.

&quot;The fraud of the Lysol douche was a byproduct of illegality,&quot; Tone says. &quot;Because birth control couldn&#039;t be advertised openly, manufacturers would use euphemisms to refer to birth control. They took advantage of consumers&#039; hopes.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;
More on that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=51170&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; 
Here&#039;s to Griswold v. Connecticut!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, it was. You can find a fantastically horrifying ad about it <a href="http://www.maudnewton.com/blog/?cat=17" rel="nofollow">here</a>. (You have to scroll down a bit to see it) A quick google search didn&#8217;t turn up any stats, but I&#8217;ve heard before there were cases of women dying because of it. </p>
<blockquote><p>When these devices <em>(referring to birth control devices)</em> were declared illegal, the flourishing trade simply began selling them as &#8220;hygiene&#8221; products. For example, vaginal sponges were sold to protect women from &#8220;germs&#8221; instead of sperm. This led to misleading if not downright fraudulent advertising. From 1930 until 1960, the most popular female contraceptive was Lysol disinfectant &#8212; advertised as a feminine hygiene product in ads featuring testimonials from prominent European &#8220;doctors.&#8221; Later investigation by the American Medical Association showed that these experts did not exist.</p>
<p>&#8220;The fraud of the Lysol douche was a byproduct of illegality,&#8221; Tone says. &#8220;Because birth control couldn&#8217;t be advertised openly, manufacturers would use euphemisms to refer to birth control. They took advantage of consumers&#8217; hopes.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>More on that <a href="http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=51170" rel="nofollow">here</a><br />
Here&#8217;s to Griswold v. Connecticut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75544</link>
		<dc:creator>Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75544</guid>
		<description>*blinks* Lysol?

*Smacks lips uneasily, grimaces*

That&#039;s not just disgusting, it&#039;s potentially dangerous.  It has to be.

Ew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*blinks* Lysol?</p>
<p>*Smacks lips uneasily, grimaces*</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not just disgusting, it&#8217;s potentially dangerous.  It has to be.</p>
<p>Ew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galnoir</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75534</link>
		<dc:creator>galnoir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75534</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Pink Think: Becoming a Woman in Many Uneasy Lessons&lt;/em&gt;, by Lynn Peril, is packed with plenty of real exampls of this sort of thing. The most hair-raising, in my opinion: an ad for Lysol touting its use for &quot;feminine hygiene.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Pink Think: Becoming a Woman in Many Uneasy Lessons</em>, by Lynn Peril, is packed with plenty of real exampls of this sort of thing. The most hair-raising, in my opinion: an ad for Lysol touting its use for &#8220;feminine hygiene.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75530</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75530</guid>
		<description>This one&#039; s real though: 

http://www.snopes.com/language/document/hiringwomen.asp

A Guide to Hiring Women from 1943</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one&#8217; s real though: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/language/document/hiringwomen.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/language/document/hiringwomen.asp</a></p>
<p>A Guide to Hiring Women from 1943</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75529</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75529</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if there were guides similar to this back in the day. It&#039;s a hoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if there were guides similar to this back in the day. It&#8217;s a hoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75524</link>
		<dc:creator>Delta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/18/the-good-wifes-guide/#comment-75524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Be a little gay and more interesting for him.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh so being a good wife, means setting up that threesome for him...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Be a little gay and more interesting for him.</i></p>
<p>Oh so being a good wife, means setting up that threesome for him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 04:49:16 -->
