<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Progressive&#8221; McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-76134</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-76134</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alright, let me say what worries me about McCain: The amount of Democrats/liberals who believe he only says these things to get elected/win the nomination; that he doesn’t really believe this stuff. I worry that people will forget how he votes and even what he says and stick to this fantasy that he’s really “not that bad”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

fuck, if i&#039;m gonna indulge in THAT sort of thinking, i&#039;ll stick with the damn Democrats!  at least they tend to not say quite AS MUCH stuff that horrifies the crap out of me.

seriously, why on earth do people admire this fuckstain?  ever since that photo of him clinging to Dubya like the Pillsbury Doughboy squashed around a G.I. Joe doll, especially: why does anyone take him -seriously?-  gah.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alright, let me say what worries me about McCain: The amount of Democrats/liberals who believe he only says these things to get elected/win the nomination; that he doesn’t really believe this stuff. I worry that people will forget how he votes and even what he says and stick to this fantasy that he’s really “not that bad”.</p></blockquote>
<p>fuck, if i&#8217;m gonna indulge in THAT sort of thinking, i&#8217;ll stick with the damn Democrats!  at least they tend to not say quite AS MUCH stuff that horrifies the crap out of me.</p>
<p>seriously, why on earth do people admire this fuckstain?  ever since that photo of him clinging to Dubya like the Pillsbury Doughboy squashed around a G.I. Joe doll, especially: why does anyone take him -seriously?-  gah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75849</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75849</guid>
		<description>RM, I&#039;m not trying to demonize anybody, just pointing out what their beliefs actually mean in the real world. If someone wants to criminalize abortion, they&#039;re going to force millions of women who don&#039;t want to give birth to risk their lives and health. That&#039;s a simple fact. The whole &quot;murdering babies&quot; line used by anti-choicers is not remotely factual because a fetus is NOT a baby. That&#039;s what separates the two positions; one is a logical conclusion and the other is so much false rhetoric.

Maybe you could ask your mother if, having been through labor four times, she&#039;d force someone else to go through it when they didn&#039;t want to give birth. (And if her answer is, &quot;well, they shouldn&#039;t have had sex if they didn&#039;t want to give birth,&quot; then she probably is aware that she advocates using birth as punishment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RM, I&#8217;m not trying to demonize anybody, just pointing out what their beliefs actually mean in the real world. If someone wants to criminalize abortion, they&#8217;re going to force millions of women who don&#8217;t want to give birth to risk their lives and health. That&#8217;s a simple fact. The whole &#8220;murdering babies&#8221; line used by anti-choicers is not remotely factual because a fetus is NOT a baby. That&#8217;s what separates the two positions; one is a logical conclusion and the other is so much false rhetoric.</p>
<p>Maybe you could ask your mother if, having been through labor four times, she&#8217;d force someone else to go through it when they didn&#8217;t want to give birth. (And if her answer is, &#8220;well, they shouldn&#8217;t have had sex if they didn&#8217;t want to give birth,&#8221; then she probably is aware that she advocates using birth as punishment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75772</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75772</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If someone wants to force women to give birth, they do want women to be punished for having sex, whether or not they realize it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s remarkably similar to what the fundies say: pro-choicers do want to murder innocent babies, whether or not they realize it.

I not sure how useful it is to demonize those who disagree with us.

&lt;blockquote&gt;RM, what you and your mother might not realize is that giving birth is not fun.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She gave birth 4 times, so I&#039;m guessing she has an idea of how much &quot;fun&quot; it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If someone wants to force women to give birth, they do want women to be punished for having sex, whether or not they realize it.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s remarkably similar to what the fundies say: pro-choicers do want to murder innocent babies, whether or not they realize it.</p>
<p>I not sure how useful it is to demonize those who disagree with us.</p>
<blockquote><p>RM, what you and your mother might not realize is that giving birth is not fun.</p></blockquote>
<p>She gave birth 4 times, so I&#8217;m guessing she has an idea of how much &#8220;fun&#8221; it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75760</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75760</guid>
		<description>RM, what you and your mother might not realize is that giving birth&lt;strong&gt; is not fun&lt;/strong&gt;. Giving birth to a child you don&#039;t want, after carrying it to term and having your life rearranged as a result, is one of the worst punishments I could imagine. If someone wants to force women to give birth, they &lt;em&gt;do &lt;/em&gt;want women to be punished for having sex, whether or not they realize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RM, what you and your mother might not realize is that giving birth<strong> is not fun</strong>. Giving birth to a child you don&#8217;t want, after carrying it to term and having your life rearranged as a result, is one of the worst punishments I could imagine. If someone wants to force women to give birth, they <em>do </em>want women to be punished for having sex, whether or not they realize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmc90</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75735</link>
		<dc:creator>bmc90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75735</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s useful to go back to the war on drugs with McCain because it shows his true stripes.  A progressive will at least ask the question as to why large numbers of people are engaging in a certain activity and what the system is doing to contribute to that (i.e. lack of meaningful socio-econcomic opportunity for certain groups combined with a lack of enforcement against white suburban users), and to what extent the cure could be worse than the problem (overcrowed jails, diversion of law enforcement away from finding the likes of Tim McVeigh - I date the Oklahoma City bombing as the offiical end of the war on drugs - why are you pulling over black kids on the freeway while Tim speeds by in his U-Haul?).  But McCain invariably figures that the solution MUST be putting more people in jail, invading drug producing countries, and taking away civil rights.  It&#039;s how he will approach EVERY problem, including a space alien invasion.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s useful to go back to the war on drugs with McCain because it shows his true stripes.  A progressive will at least ask the question as to why large numbers of people are engaging in a certain activity and what the system is doing to contribute to that (i.e. lack of meaningful socio-econcomic opportunity for certain groups combined with a lack of enforcement against white suburban users), and to what extent the cure could be worse than the problem (overcrowed jails, diversion of law enforcement away from finding the likes of Tim McVeigh &#8211; I date the Oklahoma City bombing as the offiical end of the war on drugs &#8211; why are you pulling over black kids on the freeway while Tim speeds by in his U-Haul?).  But McCain invariably figures that the solution MUST be putting more people in jail, invading drug producing countries, and taking away civil rights.  It&#8217;s how he will approach EVERY problem, including a space alien invasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75730</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75730</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is it not a destruction of a human life when the fetus is the product of a rape?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It still is, but is less offensive to her than forcing a woman to go through the added trauma of giving birth to, and raising the child of her rapist.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Does she support long criminal sentences for women in the non-rape scenarios for destroying the human life?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No.  She wishes that it would be made illegal again (we&#039;re Canadian) and that the doctors would be prosecuted if they continue to perform abortions.  She believes that women who get abortions are misguided, not bad people worthy of punishment.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope you won’t be upset when I express my wish that national policy and Constitutional law aren’t informed by your mother’s personal whims.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Them&#039;s fightin&#039; words!!!

Just kidding.  I only mentioned her as evidence that not all anti-abortionists want to punish women for having sex.  They all seem to get painted with that same broad brush (like when the fundies say that all pro-abortion people support the murder of innocent babies).

For what it&#039;s worth, I support the Canadian abortion law; legal at any time during the pregnancy, for any reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is it not a destruction of a human life when the fetus is the product of a rape?</p></blockquote>
<p>It still is, but is less offensive to her than forcing a woman to go through the added trauma of giving birth to, and raising the child of her rapist.</p>
<blockquote><p>Does she support long criminal sentences for women in the non-rape scenarios for destroying the human life?</p></blockquote>
<p>No.  She wishes that it would be made illegal again (we&#8217;re Canadian) and that the doctors would be prosecuted if they continue to perform abortions.  She believes that women who get abortions are misguided, not bad people worthy of punishment.</p>
<blockquote><p>I hope you won’t be upset when I express my wish that national policy and Constitutional law aren’t informed by your mother’s personal whims.</p></blockquote>
<p>Them&#8217;s fightin&#8217; words!!!</p>
<p>Just kidding.  I only mentioned her as evidence that not all anti-abortionists want to punish women for having sex.  They all seem to get painted with that same broad brush (like when the fundies say that all pro-abortion people support the murder of innocent babies).</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I support the Canadian abortion law; legal at any time during the pregnancy, for any reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75726</link>
		<dc:creator>norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75726</guid>
		<description>RM: Why is it not a destruction of a human life when the fetus is the product of a rape? Is it subhuman then? Does she support long criminal sentences for women in the non-rape scenarios for destroying the human life?

I hope you won&#039;t be upset when I express my wish that national policy and Constitutional law aren&#039;t informed by your mother&#039;s personal whims. God knows what the country would be like if my Mom ran it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RM: Why is it not a destruction of a human life when the fetus is the product of a rape? Is it subhuman then? Does she support long criminal sentences for women in the non-rape scenarios for destroying the human life?</p>
<p>I hope you won&#8217;t be upset when I express my wish that national policy and Constitutional law aren&#8217;t informed by your mother&#8217;s personal whims. God knows what the country would be like if my Mom ran it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Browner-Hamlin</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75725</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Browner-Hamlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75725</guid>
		<description>Donna Darko @ 15:
&lt;blockquote&gt;He was progressive to Republicans&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Progressive is not a relative term. I find it hard to believe that Republicans place McCain in the same category as Ned Lamont, Sherrod Brown, and Bernie Sanders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna Darko @ 15:</p>
<blockquote><p>He was progressive to Republicans</p></blockquote>
<p>Progressive is not a relative term. I find it hard to believe that Republicans place McCain in the same category as Ned Lamont, Sherrod Brown, and Bernie Sanders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raging Moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75718</link>
		<dc:creator>Raging Moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75718</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because if a woman is raped, then it’s not her “fault” that she’s pregnant, and she should be allowed access to a medical procedure. But women who have the audacity to have sex by choice should be punished. And carrying a pregnancy to term should be a punishment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know if it matters, but not all who oppose abortion think this way.  My mother is anti-abortion because she believes it is the destruction of a human life, not because she wishes to punish women for having sex.  She agrees with the rape exception as she believes it is unfair to force a woman to have a child that would be a permanent reminder of her rape, and a connection to the rapist.

She&#039;s hardly a right wing kook, as she opposes capital punishment, has no problem with contraception, and favours euthanasia (she had to make the decision to &quot;pull the plug&quot; after a stroke left my grandfather in a permanent vegetative state).

Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because if a woman is raped, then it’s not her “fault” that she’s pregnant, and she should be allowed access to a medical procedure. But women who have the audacity to have sex by choice should be punished. And carrying a pregnancy to term should be a punishment.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if it matters, but not all who oppose abortion think this way.  My mother is anti-abortion because she believes it is the destruction of a human life, not because she wishes to punish women for having sex.  She agrees with the rape exception as she believes it is unfair to force a woman to have a child that would be a permanent reminder of her rape, and a connection to the rapist.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s hardly a right wing kook, as she opposes capital punishment, has no problem with contraception, and favours euthanasia (she had to make the decision to &#8220;pull the plug&#8221; after a stroke left my grandfather in a permanent vegetative state).</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75707</link>
		<dc:creator>norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/11/20/progressive-mccain/#comment-75707</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special39/articles/1003mccainbook5.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Keating Five&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special39/articles/1003mccainbook5.html" rel="nofollow">Keating Five</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.046 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 03:05:26 -->
