Author: zuzu has written 1119 posts for this blog.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

3 Responses

  1. 1
    Bolo 12.5.2006 at 1:53 pm |

    My god. They have destroyed this man’s mind. I think Iraq, Afghanistan, and everything else are orders of magnitude worse, but for some reason reading about Padilla’s state just hits a nerve somewhere that all the other stories don’t.

    I can only speculate that it’s because he was under the direct supervision of our state apparatus at the time. Bombing innocent civilians in a far-away land for their oil is just plain evil… but spending three years turning a single individual’s mind to mush while feeding him and providing him shelter? There’s such a huge sadistic streak in there that exists on a personal level.

    Anyone remember seeing “Seven?” And the victim who was so mentally tortured that he thrashed around when just a little light was shone on him? Our government has done something akin to that, though not quite to the extreme portrayed in the movie.

  2. 2
    sylviasrevenge 12.5.2006 at 3:53 pm |

    The saying about “gaining the whole world for the price of one’s soul” comes to mind, with this account representing our government’s failing attempts to harvest both crops at once.

  3. 3
    randomliberal/Robert 12.5.2006 at 10:55 pm |

    I’ve been studying civil liberties in wartime in a great class this semester, and we just went over this case last week. The history of the case is much worse than you make out. The Supremes didn’t order shit. When they heard the case in 2004, they punted, saying in a 5-4 decision that Padilla’s lawyer had filed for the writ of habeas corpus in the wrong court and had improperly named Donald Rumsfeld as the defendent. This despite the fact that both the District Court of the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found that the case was properly filed and granted the writ. Following that, Padilla’s lawyer refiled in the proper court and named the proper defendent, and the District Court for South Carolina ruled in favor of Padilla as well.

    Then the real fun began. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned (Michael Luttig wrote the opinion). Padilla appealed to the Supreme Court. The government, attempting to avoid a showdown it feared it would lose, finally filed these vague-ass charges. They also filed a request with the courts asking them to allow the government to transfer Padilla from military to civilian custody, in an attempt to render the question of whether the government could hold an American citizen indefinitely and without charges moot. The 4th Circuit denied the request, with Luttig writing an opinion in which he saw that the government was trying to pull a fast one. The government appealed to the SCOTUS. Far from ordering a transfer, SCOTUS was merely being a good lapdog when it granted the government’s request for the transfer. Then, in April 2005, SCOTUS did exactly what the government wanted: It declined to hear Padilla’s appeal of the 4th Circuit’s original decision denying him the writ of habeas corpus because his transfer to civilian custody and the indictments brought against him rendered the question moot.

    Sorry about the length, but this particular set of cases is something i’m very passionate about.

Comments are closed.