Please write a letter to the editor about the misinformation spread by this article. Plan B, a form of emergency contraception (the “morning-after” pill), is a high dose of birth control pills. It prevents pregnancy from occurring, and cannot actually cause abortion. Let Time know. Here’s the whole list of people you should contact:
Ed McCarrick, Publisher
Matthew Turck, Associate Publisher
Norman Pearlstine, Editor-In-Chief
Ann S. Moore, CEO
Dawn Bridges, SVP
Nora McAniff, EVP
John Squires, EVP
John Redpath, General Counsel
John Huey, Editorial Director
The article is otherwise fairly interesting, and it does point out that criminalizing abortion does not lower the abortion rate, and only results in women’s deaths:
The abortion measure may have even broader backing, according to the Mexico City-based pro-choice group Catholics For the Right to Decide, whose surveys in Mexico, where at least 90% of the population is Catholic, show a softening on abortion. “It’s become as much a public health issue now as a moral question,” says group spokeswoman Sandra Fosado, noting that more than 500,000 Mexican women seek illegal abortions each year — and more than 2,000 die annually as a result.
The numbers are equally grim around impoverished Latin America, where the United Nations estimates more than 4 million clandestine abortions are performed each year, resulting in more than 5,000 women’s deaths. Underground abortions are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in Chile. Although Chile has one of South America’s strictest anti-abortion codes, it’s estimated to have twice as many abortions each year (200,000) as Canada — a country with twice Chile’s population. (Abortion is legal in Canada.)
Abortion is illegal in Latin America largely because of the influence of the Catholic church. There are a great many Catholic leaders and individuals throughout Latin America who see the harm that illegal abortion has caused, and who back abortion rights because they see what it looks like on the ground. But the church as an institution has caused significant harm to women in Latin America. Thousands of women die every year from unsafe abortion. Hundreds of thousands (millions?) are injured. In Mexico alone, more than 100,000 of the 500,000 women who procure illegal abortions every year are hospitalized — a full fifth. Two thousand die.
Yet the church continues to oppose contraception, which could prevent millions of illegal abortions. The church continues to promote a culture of shame around out-of-wedlock pregnancy, pushing women into abortion. Hell, they support forcing an 11-year-old rape victim to give birth — and they excommunicated everyone involved in helping her to obtain an abortion.
Attempts at decreasing the abortion rate are very noble. I’m fairly confident that no woman wants to be in the position where she has to choose to terminate a pregnancy — it means that she’s pregnant when she doesn’t want to be, or she wanted to be pregnant and circumstances changed. Attempts to help women avoid those situations are incredibly laudable. But what, exactly, does the Catholic church do to help women avoid abortion, other than trying to illegalize it — which, as statistics show, doesn’t actually decrease the abortion rate but only serves to make it more dangerous?
There are certainly priests and Catholic individuals who do quite a bit to help women — and some of those individuals identify as “pro-life” or anti-abortion. There are individuals who do not shame women for out-of-wedlock pregnancy, who help them to prevent pregnancy, who promote health care access, who push for social policies that give pregnant women the resources to have wanted children. But the church as an institution is instead focused on keeping abortion illegal and blocking contraception access. I can understand their reasoning — they have a larger social view of sexuality and reproduction, and promote the ideal that sex should only occur within opposite-sex marriage, that it should be for the dual purpose of procreation and emotional bonding, and that all sex should be open to conception and eventual childbirth. It’s not my ideal world view, but I can understand their justification for promoting it. But if they’re going to do that, they need to recognize the collateral damage that inevitably occurs when their religiously-based ideals transfer into social policy and law. They need to recognize that the real world is not their ideal, and that their policies do cause death and harm to millions of women. They can certainly argue that such collateral damage is a justifiable side effect of the greater goal of promoting the Catholic ideal of sex and family. I’m personally skeptical of any family-based moral goal which leaves millions of bodies in its wake, but that’s me, and I am obviously not the Catholic church. But I have yet to hear the church address the deaths and injuries that it causes. The very least they could do is be honest, and either start promoting policies which save women’s lives, or admit that they’re more concerned with ideology and just don’t think women’s lives are worth saving.
Thanks to Christina for the link.
Similar Posts (automatically generated):
- Early-Term Abortion Legalized in Mexico City by zuzu April 24, 2007
- Does This Mean He Has to Excommunicate Himself? by Jill May 10, 2007
- More Bad News for Repro Rights by Jill October 26, 2006
- Good International Repro Rights News by Jill April 11, 2007
- “Pro-life” laws kill women by Jill July 30, 2007