(or browse the Archives by date, category, tags etc)
get blog updates
Recent Comments
- Azalea on The Annual Post About Sexist Super Bowl Commercials 2012
- LotusBen on The Annual Post About Sexist Super Bowl Commercials 2012
- Ornytus on Pete Hoekstra is super racist, doesn’t understand the word “satire”
- Mórrígan on The Annual Post About Sexist Super Bowl Commercials 2012
- Argenti Aertheri on Prudie on “real” rape
- Celeste on The Annual Post About Sexist Super Bowl Commercials 2012
- ginmar on Prudie on “real” rape
- Tony_ on Pete Hoekstra is super racist, doesn’t understand the word “satire”
- Tony_ on Pete Hoekstra is super racist, doesn’t understand the word “satire”
- Sam on Prudie on “real” rape
Most Commented Recent Posts
- An Asexual Map for Sex-Positive Feminism (138)
- So should we just start calling high heels "body modification"? (128)
- Some Transformative Justice Links (127)
- Women refuses to give raped daughter EC, brags about it on internet. (124)
- Prudie on "real" rape (105)
- FNTT Season 8, Round 1: the "So a girl and a vibrator walk onto a plane..." edition (89)
- Occupy Valentine's Day (80)
- FNTT Season 8, Round 1: the REAL FEMINISTS edition (77)
- Facts, myths, and blankety-blank lies about Planned Parenthood and the Susan G. Komen Foundation (64)
- FNTT Season 8, Round 1: The Baby-Killing Whores Edition (63)
Yes Means Yes!
We’re in the Guardian

More of Feministe On
For wordpress.com support
just for you, a widget as requested
Sponsored By
Tried and Tested
The authors of this website have hand-selected these titles because we believe they may be of interest to a feminist audience.
Consider them for gifts to friends, family, or yourself! We do receive some income if you choose to order these titles based on our recommendations. All funds help support our costs to provide this space.
Consider them for gifts to friends, family, or yourself! We do receive some income if you choose to order these titles based on our recommendations. All funds help support our costs to provide this space.



It’s interesting that the first comment to that post is some schmuck insisting that death threats against women are made up problems that distract us from the real issues facing the world. It provided a nice “case in point” to the original post.
Kozmik is just a schmuck. When Henry Ford posted and the people at TPM brought out a lot of no-cussword criticisms of Ford’s policies etc, Kozmik was basically the only guy defending him.
And when I say “defending,” I mean “acting like Joe Lieberman.”
I think Josh Marshall needs to do a little weed-pulling over there. But great piece by EJ Graff.
Bruce, seriously. I really like TPM, but I avoid the cafe as a general rule because the comments are frequently pitiful. Which is a shame, because there are some great people engaged over there.
I concur – an excellent piece. I am a motorcyclist and check out many forums for biking, and it is just sickening how abusive most men can be about women. What’s even more appalling is that the women who participate in those fora are blind to the abuse, often because the guys think they are cute. (I’ve found a few places where women are appreciated but they are rare indeed.)
So, re the comments there, is “the feministing crowd” now the new code for “the women’s studies set”?
It must be tiring to live with so much rage all the time.
Seconding evil fizz, Bruce and others who think there needs to be some wheat/chaff separation over there at TPM Café. The obnoxious commenter just utterly derails and disallows any interesting conversation.
Why do bullies use sexualized insults and threats of violence to harass women? Because it works; it offends and scares women. Being antisocial, they would use the exact same tactic against guys too, but it wouldn’t work.
That’s a matter of statistics; anybody is going to be a lot more nervous about dangers that happen all the time than about dangers that almost never happen. If some internet psycho started sending me (I’m male) threats of rape, I wouldn’t believe he’d actually do it, because outside of prisons, males almost never get raped. So it’s just not a credible threat. Since the typical male target remains unaffected by this variety of threat, psycho bully types don’t bother pulling that act on male targets.
Whereas everybody who reads the paper or watches the teevee news knows women get raped pretty often. So when some creep starts mouthing off though he were going to stalk and rape a woman, even though most likely he’s just a jerk-off trying to freak her out, she takes the threat seriously, because that sort of thing actually has happened frequently before. Since that technique of harassment achieves its goal so often – the creep who is trying to freak the woman out does so – that successful technique gets used again and again and again.
How, exactly, is that more appalling than men being abusive? I’m interested to know.
That comments thread to E.J.’s piece was very interesting. It had every excuse and belittling opinion about violence against women one could possibly imagine. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that done before. Although the guys at Alternet tend to go all misogynistic, too, whenever a post says that women have any problems whatsoever.
I don’t know if I’d say men just about never get raped out of prison, I think it’s more that men are more likely to hide and repress.
But I agree with W. Kiernan’s point.
I’m sick of seeing all this shrugging off of the issue, like the people being harassed should just walk it off. Some creep leaving hate mail is one thing, but to have someone go on and on in great detail about torturing, raping and killing you is whole new level of crap that no one should be expected to quietly put up with.
To me, that’s the key to this whole issue – opening up space in the culture of blogs for people to actually talk about how these things affect them and not just pretend that we’re too strong or smart to let them hurt us. Being bullied isn’t about how strong the bullied is, it’s about how cruel the bully is, and until we see that, keeping quiet about it is the same as victim-blaming.
they would use the exact same tactic against guys too, but it wouldn’t work. – W. Kiernan
Except they do sometimes use these tactics against guys, although certainly not as often as they do against women.
is “the feministing crowd” now the new code for “the women’s studies set”?
I hope so.
A quick response to Echidne: though it’s true that many anti-feminist views were offered in that thread, they were almost 80% from just one user. Most of the Cafe denizens were fighting against him.
In terms of “weeding” the thread, I generally try to stay hands off unless something crosses the line. While I might not agree with many of the anti-feminist arguments that were made on that thread, that’s not reason enough to start to delete things. Also, the community itself is pretty good about discussing this stuff.
I’m curious as to what others think we can do better, though. Always open to constructive criticism.