<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bingo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bingo night &#171; Tlönista</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100090</link>
		<dc:creator>Bingo night &#171; Tlönista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100090</guid>
		<description>[...] 								  				 	 				 					Just a quick roundup of the various troll bingo cards posted at Feministe: Lauredhel&#8217;s Anti-feminist Bingo. Lorelei&#8217;s MRA Bingo. Midnight Lou [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 								  				 	 				 					Just a quick roundup of the various troll bingo cards posted at Feministe: Lauredhel&#8217;s Anti-feminist Bingo. Lorelei&#8217;s MRA Bingo. Midnight Lou [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Pang</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100086</link>
		<dc:creator>A Pang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100086</guid>
		<description>For the nerds!

The folks at Girl-Wonder.org have created a truly awesome &lt;a href=&quot;http://girl-wonder.org/girlsreadcomics/index.php?entry=entry070415-071159&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anti-Comics-Feminist Bingo Card&lt;/a&gt;. As pointed out in the linked forum thread, they unfortunately omitted &quot;Comics are a business, people make what sells!&quot; But squares like &quot;Why are you complaining about comics when women in Muslim countries are oppressed?&quot; are applicable in so many contexts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the nerds!</p>
<p>The folks at Girl-Wonder.org have created a truly awesome <a href="http://girl-wonder.org/girlsreadcomics/index.php?entry=entry070415-071159" rel="nofollow">Anti-Comics-Feminist Bingo Card</a>. As pointed out in the linked forum thread, they unfortunately omitted &#8220;Comics are a business, people make what sells!&#8221; But squares like &#8220;Why are you complaining about comics when women in Muslim countries are oppressed?&#8221; are applicable in so many contexts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kali</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100078</link>
		<dc:creator>kali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100078</guid>
		<description>Can I ask a question about the White Liberal Bingo? I don&#039;t get what&#039;s wrong with this statement:
&lt;i&gt;Claims that not dating POC is purely a matter of physical preference—“I don’t date short/redheaded men, either!”&lt;/i&gt;

Is that statement like &quot;the patriarchy hurts men too&quot; and it&#039;s fine in some contexts but in the context of a bunch of the other statements on the board it&#039;s kind of suspect? Because in isolation I can&#039;t see anything wrong with it, and the implications of objecting to it are kind of disturbing. It sounds like blaming women for being &quot;unfair&quot; in their sexual preferences, the way Nice Guys do. And I&#039;ve occasionally been accused of racism by men I&#039;ve rejected, &lt;i&gt;purely because I rejected them&lt;/i&gt;. It was annoying when it was just some random stranger and deeply upsetting when it was someone who I thought was my friend but turned out to have entitled Nice Guy tendencies. So that&#039;s probably affecting how I read that statement: who the hell thinks they have a right to tell a woman that she ought to date someone she doesn&#039;t want to? Am I missing some crucial bit of context here?
(I would also say, just for context,  that this isn&#039;t a physical preference I personally have.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I ask a question about the White Liberal Bingo? I don&#8217;t get what&#8217;s wrong with this statement:<br />
<i>Claims that not dating POC is purely a matter of physical preference—“I don’t date short/redheaded men, either!”</i></p>
<p>Is that statement like &#8220;the patriarchy hurts men too&#8221; and it&#8217;s fine in some contexts but in the context of a bunch of the other statements on the board it&#8217;s kind of suspect? Because in isolation I can&#8217;t see anything wrong with it, and the implications of objecting to it are kind of disturbing. It sounds like blaming women for being &#8220;unfair&#8221; in their sexual preferences, the way Nice Guys do. And I&#8217;ve occasionally been accused of racism by men I&#8217;ve rejected, <i>purely because I rejected them</i>. It was annoying when it was just some random stranger and deeply upsetting when it was someone who I thought was my friend but turned out to have entitled Nice Guy tendencies. So that&#8217;s probably affecting how I read that statement: who the hell thinks they have a right to tell a woman that she ought to date someone she doesn&#8217;t want to? Am I missing some crucial bit of context here?<br />
(I would also say, just for context,  that this isn&#8217;t a physical preference I personally have.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100041</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-100041</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I saw that one.&lt;blockquote&gt;Prefers to be called “a person of European descent.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I saw that one.<br />
<blockquote>Prefers to be called “a person of European descent.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99860</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauredhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99860</guid>
		<description>Have you seen this White Liberal Bingo card?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i-dreamed-i-was.livejournal.com/6105.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://i-dreamed-i-was.livejournal.com/6105.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen this White Liberal Bingo card?<br />
<a href="http://i-dreamed-i-was.livejournal.com/6105.html" rel="nofollow">http://i-dreamed-i-was.livejournal.com/6105.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter Scribe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99815</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99815</guid>
		<description>#33 Bolo: Don&#039;t forget the inverse of that principle. Not only are white men oppressed, but every other group has it made. &quot;All blacks have to do is show up at the welfare office. Women hold all the cards in relationships. It&#039;s never been more &lt;i&gt;fabulous &lt;/i&gt;to be gay.&quot; Etc., etc. Everybody has it easy but them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#33 Bolo: Don&#8217;t forget the inverse of that principle. Not only are white men oppressed, but every other group has it made. &#8220;All blacks have to do is show up at the welfare office. Women hold all the cards in relationships. It&#8217;s never been more <i>fabulous </i>to be gay.&#8221; Etc., etc. Everybody has it easy but them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midnight Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99780</link>
		<dc:creator>Midnight Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99780</guid>
		<description>Weeks ago, I made Sexual Assault Bingo for a thread on another forum.  The thread died and I never got to post it, but here it is, and welcome to it:

http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i281/MidnightLouise/bingo3.jpg
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weeks ago, I made Sexual Assault Bingo for a thread on another forum.  The thread died and I never got to post it, but here it is, and welcome to it:</p>
<p><a href="http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i281/MidnightLouise/bingo3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i281/MidnightLouise/bingo3.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99779</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99779</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like a bingo card that&#039;s specifically meant for discussions with women who don&#039;t claim to be feminists :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like a bingo card that&#8217;s specifically meant for discussions with women who don&#8217;t claim to be feminists :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JennaJ</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99776</link>
		<dc:creator>JennaJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99776</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget child support--something like, &quot;you could have had an abortion! I had NO CHOICE! You want to be equal, take responsibility--why should I have to pay any amount, however minimal, for my own baby when I had NO CHOICE?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget child support&#8211;something like, &#8220;you could have had an abortion! I had NO CHOICE! You want to be equal, take responsibility&#8211;why should I have to pay any amount, however minimal, for my own baby when I had NO CHOICE?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99736</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/16/bingo/#comment-99736</guid>
		<description>Nick - there&#039;s also the idea, as brought up in the discussion at Pandagon, that the point of the cards is to identify a running theme and get bingo. So one occurrence of &quot;patriarchy hurts men too&quot; could be completely innocent and well-intentioned and fit in with the thread. But it could also be an attempt at a derail, and when coupled with stunners like &quot;sexual assault is rare, you&#039;re just paranoid&quot; and others, it racks up the squares. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8211; there&#8217;s also the idea, as brought up in the discussion at Pandagon, that the point of the cards is to identify a running theme and get bingo. So one occurrence of &#8220;patriarchy hurts men too&#8221; could be completely innocent and well-intentioned and fit in with the thread. But it could also be an attempt at a derail, and when coupled with stunners like &#8220;sexual assault is rare, you&#8217;re just paranoid&#8221; and others, it racks up the squares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
