<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By all means, let&#8217;s use the fear of fat to justify feeding (patented!) hormones to infants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101557</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101557</guid>
		<description>Gina, you&#039;re boring enough that I&#039;m banning you.

What do we have to do to get a better class of troll around here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gina, you&#8217;re boring enough that I&#8217;m banning you.</p>
<p>What do we have to do to get a better class of troll around here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawise</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101540</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101540</guid>
		<description>Hormone supplementation under the care of a physician after testing to ensure that it is necessary is fine.  Running down to the grocery store for some after seeing a commercial about overweight babies is not.  Leptin is necessary and it is possible that some children and adults may need it supplemented due to imbalances and it is even possible that infant formula may benefit from having it added but that has not been proven to be necessary for the majority of people.  Unnecessary supplements can themselves cause health problem down the line especially in the liver and kidneys.
No one is forcing anyone to get inoculations, they are considering adding Gardisil to the list of advised and funded inoculations offered to parents for their children.  Guess you don&#039;t want it for your children, but I would definitely consider it for my son once they do some more conclusive testing. Most places have opt-out programs for people on religious or health grounds, I may think vaccination saves me alot of time, trouble and puking but you might not. 

Back to the subject, sold in store supplements are not as rigorously followed as doctor prescribed, so high leptin infant formula would likely be doctor prescribed, at least initially- this means out of the reach of most families unless it is supported by state-funded programs. I don&#039;t see this happening anytime soon and any firm results will take 15+ years to be seen, longer for it to show any positive result in a large population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hormone supplementation under the care of a physician after testing to ensure that it is necessary is fine.  Running down to the grocery store for some after seeing a commercial about overweight babies is not.  Leptin is necessary and it is possible that some children and adults may need it supplemented due to imbalances and it is even possible that infant formula may benefit from having it added but that has not been proven to be necessary for the majority of people.  Unnecessary supplements can themselves cause health problem down the line especially in the liver and kidneys.<br />
No one is forcing anyone to get inoculations, they are considering adding Gardisil to the list of advised and funded inoculations offered to parents for their children.  Guess you don&#8217;t want it for your children, but I would definitely consider it for my son once they do some more conclusive testing. Most places have opt-out programs for people on religious or health grounds, I may think vaccination saves me alot of time, trouble and puking but you might not. </p>
<p>Back to the subject, sold in store supplements are not as rigorously followed as doctor prescribed, so high leptin infant formula would likely be doctor prescribed, at least initially- this means out of the reach of most families unless it is supported by state-funded programs. I don&#8217;t see this happening anytime soon and any firm results will take 15+ years to be seen, longer for it to show any positive result in a large population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101534</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101534</guid>
		<description>mnenostyne,   You aren&#039;t a stupid person.  I am sure that your neo-intellectual jargon will scare off some people?   I will admit and concede that they are different.  My question deals with the unscrupulous act of forced inoculation or hormone supplementation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mnenostyne,   You aren&#8217;t a stupid person.  I am sure that your neo-intellectual jargon will scare off some people?   I will admit and concede that they are different.  My question deals with the unscrupulous act of forced inoculation or hormone supplementation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101533</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101533</guid>
		<description>zuzu,  even Jill said the following.

For one thing, as Price points out, who’s going to offer up their infants for experimental research?

Is a 6th grader any different?  

Ever listen to TV?  There is s commercial now about how as many as 70% of people taking anti-depression pills aren&#039;t getting any relief.  How can anyone condemn someone for wanting to protect &#039;their&#039; child?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zuzu,  even Jill said the following.</p>
<p>For one thing, as Price points out, who’s going to offer up their infants for experimental research?</p>
<p>Is a 6th grader any different?  </p>
<p>Ever listen to TV?  There is s commercial now about how as many as 70% of people taking anti-depression pills aren&#8217;t getting any relief.  How can anyone condemn someone for wanting to protect &#8216;their&#8217; child?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101531</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101531</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand a word you just said.  You don&#039;t think leptin doesn&#039;t work.  Try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand a word you just said.  You don&#8217;t think leptin doesn&#8217;t work.  Try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mnemosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101529</link>
		<dc:creator>Mnemosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101529</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I won’t make anymore jokes if someone would please explain to me why it is a capitol offense to give hormones and the best thing since sliced bread to give HPV vaccine?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again, you don&#039;t seem to understand that a hormone and a vaccine are &lt;em&gt;not the same thing&lt;/em&gt;.  They are very different things that don&#039;t act in a similar manner in even the vaguest way.

It&#039;s not just apples and oranges you&#039;re comparing here -- you&#039;re saying, &quot;Why won&#039;t you admit that this steak and this tree are exactly the same thing?!?!&quot;

Really, I think you&#039;re the stupidest troll I&#039;ve seen online in a very long time.  Let me guess -- 14 years old, logging online from mommy&#039;s basement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I won’t make anymore jokes if someone would please explain to me why it is a capitol offense to give hormones and the best thing since sliced bread to give HPV vaccine?</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, you don&#8217;t seem to understand that a hormone and a vaccine are <em>not the same thing</em>.  They are very different things that don&#8217;t act in a similar manner in even the vaguest way.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just apples and oranges you&#8217;re comparing here &#8212; you&#8217;re saying, &#8220;Why won&#8217;t you admit that this steak and this tree are exactly the same thing?!?!&#8221;</p>
<p>Really, I think you&#8217;re the stupidest troll I&#8217;ve seen online in a very long time.  Let me guess &#8212; 14 years old, logging online from mommy&#8217;s basement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101506</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101506</guid>
		<description>Alie,

Thanks for the link, but I didn&#039;t read it. I have, how do you say, personal experience in the matter. 

I see this issue as another attempt to make a cheap buck off women (never seen that before!) by preying on their fears of being fat. 

As far as obese not being good for you, duh. You will be hard-pressed to find a morbidly obese person who says, &quot;I can&#039;t walk up a flight of stairs, but I&#039;m healthy as a horse!&quot; 

What angers me is these so-called solutions to the problem. Certainly don&#039;t critically analyze the commercials we see, the products we&#039;re sold, the fashion industry lies we&#039;re spoonfed (Fashion- another billion dollar industry. Just like Big Pharma). 

None of these self-styled dietitians and &quot;health experts&quot; ever seem to bother to wonder at the motivation. None ever question the implied assumption that obese people think, &quot;You know what? It would be really fun to weigh 400 pounds and submit myself to a lifetime of humiliation and public ostracism. Think I&#039;ll get started on that right now.&quot; Fat is a disease, and it is a symptom. It is the one way a person can brandish a great, giant middle finger to society and say, &quot;SCREW YOU! I don&#039;t believe in that crap! I exist! I take up space!&quot; Fat expresses defiance, and provides an illusion of safety (if you are deluded by the notion that rapists are sexually attracted to their victims, as many are). 

Somehow, I don&#039;t think leptin in the formula doesn&#039;t look like it is going to solve that problem. But I could be wrong, of course. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alie,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link, but I didn&#8217;t read it. I have, how do you say, personal experience in the matter. </p>
<p>I see this issue as another attempt to make a cheap buck off women (never seen that before!) by preying on their fears of being fat. </p>
<p>As far as obese not being good for you, duh. You will be hard-pressed to find a morbidly obese person who says, &#8220;I can&#8217;t walk up a flight of stairs, but I&#8217;m healthy as a horse!&#8221; </p>
<p>What angers me is these so-called solutions to the problem. Certainly don&#8217;t critically analyze the commercials we see, the products we&#8217;re sold, the fashion industry lies we&#8217;re spoonfed (Fashion- another billion dollar industry. Just like Big Pharma). </p>
<p>None of these self-styled dietitians and &#8220;health experts&#8221; ever seem to bother to wonder at the motivation. None ever question the implied assumption that obese people think, &#8220;You know what? It would be really fun to weigh 400 pounds and submit myself to a lifetime of humiliation and public ostracism. Think I&#8217;ll get started on that right now.&#8221; Fat is a disease, and it is a symptom. It is the one way a person can brandish a great, giant middle finger to society and say, &#8220;SCREW YOU! I don&#8217;t believe in that crap! I exist! I take up space!&#8221; Fat expresses defiance, and provides an illusion of safety (if you are deluded by the notion that rapists are sexually attracted to their victims, as many are). </p>
<p>Somehow, I don&#8217;t think leptin in the formula doesn&#8217;t look like it is going to solve that problem. But I could be wrong, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101499</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101499</guid>
		<description>\&quot;Actually, by adding it into infant formula, it is intended to address the potential of fatness of children. This has nothing to do with actual fat children who are often fat due to bad eating habits easily addressed by teaching the family good eating habits\&quot;

So is that your solutions to fat kids?   And i am talking about fat kids, not mildly overweight.  I am also believe if you really want to know what I said you can easily find out what it was by looking back and reading.  I simply qestioned why would someone have two such opposing views on giving \&quot;medicine\&quot; to unconsenting children.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\&#8221;Actually, by adding it into infant formula, it is intended to address the potential of fatness of children. This has nothing to do with actual fat children who are often fat due to bad eating habits easily addressed by teaching the family good eating habits\&#8221;</p>
<p>So is that your solutions to fat kids?   And i am talking about fat kids, not mildly overweight.  I am also believe if you really want to know what I said you can easily find out what it was by looking back and reading.  I simply qestioned why would someone have two such opposing views on giving \&#8221;medicine\&#8221; to unconsenting children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawise</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101492</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101492</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This chemical is intended to address kids who are “fat.” But there’s nothing inherently wrong with being fat. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, by adding it into infant formula, it is intended to address the potential of fatness of children.  This has nothing to do with actual fat children who are often fat due to bad eating habits easily addressed by teaching the family good eating habits or by a serious chemical imbalances that need to be addressed by pediatric specialists and not industrial additives.  Added to that is the fact that few hormones or drugs are tested on children, they are tested on adults and then used by physicians in untested ways to treat ailments in children. 
Drugs, like Gardisil, are administered in regulated doses in prescribed locations by professionals whose earning potential can be put at risk by failure to comply with regulations.
Food additives are sold in stores with pretty logos often involving cartoon characters and are ordered, shelved and checked out by people working part time to get through college.

On the fat and thin issue, my husband has broken the spirit of Hungarian grandmothers by resolutely staying scrawny despite their best efforts, my son has the same metabolism. I eat better and exercise more than either of them and I will never be thin, just like my grandma.  I am healthy. We need to stop vilifing people because of different body shapes.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This chemical is intended to address kids who are “fat.” But there’s nothing inherently wrong with being fat. </p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, by adding it into infant formula, it is intended to address the potential of fatness of children.  This has nothing to do with actual fat children who are often fat due to bad eating habits easily addressed by teaching the family good eating habits or by a serious chemical imbalances that need to be addressed by pediatric specialists and not industrial additives.  Added to that is the fact that few hormones or drugs are tested on children, they are tested on adults and then used by physicians in untested ways to treat ailments in children.<br />
Drugs, like Gardisil, are administered in regulated doses in prescribed locations by professionals whose earning potential can be put at risk by failure to comply with regulations.<br />
Food additives are sold in stores with pretty logos often involving cartoon characters and are ordered, shelved and checked out by people working part time to get through college.</p>
<p>On the fat and thin issue, my husband has broken the spirit of Hungarian grandmothers by resolutely staying scrawny despite their best efforts, my son has the same metabolism. I eat better and exercise more than either of them and I will never be thin, just like my grandma.  I am healthy. We need to stop vilifing people because of different body shapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101482</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/24/by-all-means-lets-use-the-fear-of-fat-to-justify-feeding-patented-hormones-to-infants/#comment-101482</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;So the old sticks and stone saying. Well i have been called a troll here. When will that stop&lt;/b&gt;

Huh? Where did that come from? 
&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; didn&#039;t call you a troll. 

&lt;b&gt;And to be precice, i am comparing dying from cervical cancer with dying from weight related health problems.&lt;/b&gt;

If you think that commiting suicide because people make fun of you for being fat is a weight related health problem, then we&#039;ve got a pretty serious difference of opinion. I know plenty of people who were mocked for their weight, but who were perfectly healthy individuals. 

&lt;b&gt;who is saying fat does not equal unhealthy. of course it is unhealthy to be fat.&lt;/b&gt;

No. It&#039;s unhealthy to be &lt;i&gt;morbidly obese&lt;/i&gt;. Being fat isn&#039;t necessarily any more unhealthy than being thin. Being fat is &lt;i&gt;stigmatized&lt;/i&gt; more than being thin, or being &quot;average&quot;, but, again, it&#039;s possible to be fat but be &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; healthy, just as it&#039;s possible to be &quot;average&quot; but very &lt;i&gt;unhealthy&lt;/i&gt;. Giving kids some kind of chemical to inhibit their hunger or alter their eating habits later in life does &lt;i&gt;nothing&lt;/i&gt; to address what the real concerns should be- eating &lt;i&gt;healthy&lt;/i&gt;, exercising, etc. 

&lt;b&gt;Is that the real answer, telling kids to shut up, is that going to work?&lt;/b&gt;

You&#039;re conflating several different problems and acting like they&#039;re one. 

The HPV vaccine addresses a &lt;i&gt;very specific&lt;/i&gt; problem. 
You know, HPV. 
It doesn&#039;t pretend to address unsafe sex practices. That&#039;s what education is for. 

This chemical is intended to address kids who are &quot;fat.&quot; But there&#039;s &lt;i&gt;nothing&lt;/i&gt; inherently wrong with being fat. 

&quot;Fat&quot; is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; the same as &quot;unhealthy&quot; anymore than &quot;thin&quot; is the same as &quot;healthy.&quot; 

Then you shifted over to talking about how kids hurt themselves because &lt;i&gt;other people&lt;/i&gt; mock them and humiliate them for being different. 

&lt;i&gt;No&lt;/i&gt; vaccine is going to cure &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;. That&#039;s a different problem. That&#039;s a problem with letting people be jerks. 

Homophobes target people they perceive as gay with insults and public humiliation. The solution to that is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; to try to find some chemical that would prevent children from becoming gay. You don&#039;t address the problem of assholes by changing the asshole&#039;s target, you address the problem of assholes. People who mock and humiliate children are the problem, not the child. 

If a kid is morbidly obese, you address that child&#039;s problem, and you work to fix it. But, just because a kid is seen as &quot;fat&#039; doesn&#039;t mean that she or he is unhealthy, and it&#039;s wrong to act like it does. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>So the old sticks and stone saying. Well i have been called a troll here. When will that stop</b></p>
<p>Huh? Where did that come from?<br />
<i>I</i> didn&#8217;t call you a troll. </p>
<p><b>And to be precice, i am comparing dying from cervical cancer with dying from weight related health problems.</b></p>
<p>If you think that commiting suicide because people make fun of you for being fat is a weight related health problem, then we&#8217;ve got a pretty serious difference of opinion. I know plenty of people who were mocked for their weight, but who were perfectly healthy individuals. </p>
<p><b>who is saying fat does not equal unhealthy. of course it is unhealthy to be fat.</b></p>
<p>No. It&#8217;s unhealthy to be <i>morbidly obese</i>. Being fat isn&#8217;t necessarily any more unhealthy than being thin. Being fat is <i>stigmatized</i> more than being thin, or being &#8220;average&#8221;, but, again, it&#8217;s possible to be fat but be <i>very</i> healthy, just as it&#8217;s possible to be &#8220;average&#8221; but very <i>unhealthy</i>. Giving kids some kind of chemical to inhibit their hunger or alter their eating habits later in life does <i>nothing</i> to address what the real concerns should be- eating <i>healthy</i>, exercising, etc. </p>
<p><b>Is that the real answer, telling kids to shut up, is that going to work?</b></p>
<p>You&#8217;re conflating several different problems and acting like they&#8217;re one. </p>
<p>The HPV vaccine addresses a <i>very specific</i> problem.<br />
You know, HPV.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t pretend to address unsafe sex practices. That&#8217;s what education is for. </p>
<p>This chemical is intended to address kids who are &#8220;fat.&#8221; But there&#8217;s <i>nothing</i> inherently wrong with being fat. </p>
<p>&#8220;Fat&#8221; is <i>not</i> the same as &#8220;unhealthy&#8221; anymore than &#8220;thin&#8221; is the same as &#8220;healthy.&#8221; </p>
<p>Then you shifted over to talking about how kids hurt themselves because <i>other people</i> mock them and humiliate them for being different. </p>
<p><i>No</i> vaccine is going to cure <i>that</i>. That&#8217;s a different problem. That&#8217;s a problem with letting people be jerks. </p>
<p>Homophobes target people they perceive as gay with insults and public humiliation. The solution to that is <i>not</i> to try to find some chemical that would prevent children from becoming gay. You don&#8217;t address the problem of assholes by changing the asshole&#8217;s target, you address the problem of assholes. People who mock and humiliate children are the problem, not the child. </p>
<p>If a kid is morbidly obese, you address that child&#8217;s problem, and you work to fix it. But, just because a kid is seen as &#8220;fat&#8217; doesn&#8217;t mean that she or he is unhealthy, and it&#8217;s wrong to act like it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 10:06:43 -->
