Comments on: Pro-Choice Congressmen More Likely to Have Slutty Daughters

By: John M. Burt

John M. Burt — Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:14:01 +0000

“If you are pro-life, don’t vote for candidates with daughters”

Absolutely right. Furthermore:

If you want more tax cuts for the rich and higher taxes for workers, don’t vote for a candidate who has ever held a real job.

If you want more wars like Iraq, don’t vote for veterans.

If you don’t want to hear any more about global warming, don’t vote for a candidate who has studied science.

Leading up to the general principle:

If you are stupid, don’t vote for candidates who know anything.

By: histrogeek

histrogeek — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:08:28 +0000

Well, it’s often said that the best way to make men feminists is to give them daughters… Deb the Nut Case is however wrong; conservatives with daughters have NO problem making exceptions for their princesses while abusing everyone else for exactly the same thing.

By: mythago

mythago — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:06:52 +0000

OMFG! Debbie! I haven’t heard of her in years. I knew her (well, of her–I sure didn’t want to talk to her) back when she was a wingnutlet.

By: gordo

gordo — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:28:55 +0000

I've always thought of Schlussel, Michelle Malkin, and Pam Oshrey as the Axis of Crazy. But Schlussel is the craziest, most batshit racist of them all. Here's a column in which she says that studies on earwax prove that Native Americans are not really native to the Americas, and therefore had no more right to the land than the Europeans did.

By: louise

louise — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:37:43 +0000

But what if Matthew and wife only have sex ONCE and conceive? Then I think she should get a pass on hell…but not TWICE. Nope. And don’t even think about enjoying it, slut!

That’s for MEN.

So says this whore who has failed, giving her husband “only” daughters, plans on no more kids, yet loves sex… just like her skanky mother before her.

By: Jill

Jill — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:32:13 +0000

…do you even have to ask?

By: Thealogian

Thealogian — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:31:21 +0000

The original study found that Congressmen with daughters were more likely to hold positions that supported overall women’s rights and health. Including, support for domestic violence legislation, etc. So, by this conservatives understanding, does that mean that these Congressmen have “daughters who just need to be beat” too?

By: Kristjan Wager

Kristjan Wager — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:53:41 +0000

Sorry for the blogwhoring, but the study is actually quite interesting. I wrote about the original study back in march.

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:51:26 +0000

Does anyone have the stats on Pro-Life Congressmen being more likely to sire nitwits?

By: Lee

Lee — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:18:49 +0000

Matthew, you’re alright. Men can’t be expected to not have recreational sex, so it’s just your slutty wife who’s going to hell.

I’m sure I’ll see her there, because after almost 5 years of marriage, I’m just now giving my husband a male heir. And after I have the baby, we’re going right back to our wicked, wanton ways, you know, having sex for fun. Maybe if I pretend it’s not fun we’ll both go to heaven. I’ll let you know how that works out.