Get Your Hot XXX Blog Content Here

by Jill on 6.29.2007 · 17 comments

in Blogging

Online Dating

Kiddies, don’t let your parents see you reading this filth…

Previous post: Right, so.

Next post: Wait a minute…

{ 3 trackbacks }

Sago Boulevard
6.29.2007 at 11:56 am
JABbering Stooge :: Okay, who do I have to fsck to get an NC-17? :: June :: 2007
6.29.2007 at 5:33 pm
Feministe » Recapin’ Your Ass
7.2.2007 at 10:44 am

{ 14 comments }

1 Sarah 6.29.2007 at 10:43 am

I’m assuming it’s your gratuitous use of the word “vagina”.

;)

2 Mighty Ponygirl 6.29.2007 at 11:00 am

I’m still cracking up that Feminist Gamers got a G rating.

We JUST had a lengthy discussion about Boobs in Soul Caliber IV with photos! How is that not at least a PG-13?

3 Kristen 6.29.2007 at 11:03 am

Ummm….WTF?!

One of the words they disapprove of is dick. Do they not realize that “Dick” is a NAME. Oy. God forbid you talk about the Dick Van Dyke Show.

4 Jovan1984 6.29.2007 at 11:19 am

The ratings are for the most part biased against pro-women blogs, and I don’t know why.

5 Mr. X 6.29.2007 at 11:28 am

It’s a pisstake on the movie ratings system and its innate arbitrariness. You can get an NC-17 rating by mentioning the word “zombie” too many times, and “crack” is also taboo, because obviously it only refers to the drug.

6 preying mantis 6.29.2007 at 11:31 am

I don’t think they come close to parsing with actual movie ratings. My blog got an NC-17 for four instances of ‘fuck,’ one instance of ‘fucking,’ and one instance of ‘meth.’ I mean, yes, the rating is probably actually appropriate given the entirety of my blog, but the five posts the rating generator scanned shouldn’t have scored more than an R.

7 Yuri K. 6.29.2007 at 11:44 am

Okay, time for this stupid ratings generator to go away. It’s a freaking internet application that somebody spent fifteen minutes making. It’s no more accurate or meaningful than what your mob name would be or what your website would look like if it were written by the Swedish Chef. They made a list of violent or sexual or drug-based words, count them on any given page, and give it arating based on that number. It’s not like it’s sanctioned by the MPAA.

8 Kristen 6.29.2007 at 11:45 am

The ratings are for the most part biased against pro-women blogs, and I don’t know why.

Well, for one thing “rape” is a “bad” word as is abortion, sex, porn, vagina, vulva, etc. So if you’re talking about women’s issues you’re definitely not supposed to talk to anyone under the age of 17.

9 noen 6.29.2007 at 12:33 pm

Feministe results

This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:

* murder (8x)
* drugs (5x)
* hell (4x)
* dick (3x)
* dangerous (2x)
* dead (1x)

The last one is bizarre.
Is this a faith-based initiative?

10 trailer park 6.29.2007 at 12:37 pm

lol, Mine’s NC-17, too. I say “sex” and “abortion” too much.

11 MaxPolun 6.29.2007 at 12:42 pm

The arbitrariness mirrors that of the real movie ratings system

12 noen 6.29.2007 at 12:45 pm

boingboing.net
rated G

huffingtonpost.com
rated G
* dick (5x)
* sex (1x)

michellemalkin.com
rated PG-13
* bomb (7x)
* kill (1x)

hotair.com
rated PG
* hell (2x)
* gay (1x)

blogsforbush.com
rated NC-17
* abortion (10x)
* death (3x)
* dangerous (2x)
* murder (1x)

instapundit.com
rated R
* kill (4x)
* suicide (2x)
* sex (1x)

Seems pretty uneven.

13 Cola Johnson 6.29.2007 at 3:40 pm

It flagged the word “missionary” on mine.

I said, “…I’m a flag waving Apple missionary…”

Ahem.

Mine should be ‘R’ at worst.

14 False Flag Operative 6.29.2007 at 4:24 pm

The ratings are for the most part biased against pro-women blogs, and I don’t know why.

I agree. Apparently neoconservative blogs only get a PG-13 to an R rating.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Right, so.

Next post: Wait a minute…