<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Good.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-114530</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-114530</guid>
		<description>it is depressing, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is depressing, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JABbering Stooge  :: If I could sum up the Roberts-Scalito Supreme Court in one cartoon: :: June :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-114228</link>
		<dc:creator>JABbering Stooge  :: If I could sum up the Roberts-Scalito Supreme Court in one cartoon: :: June :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-114228</guid>
		<description>[...] Thuggery,  Dissent = Treason,  Our Dying Democracy          	 	And as others have put it much more eloquently than me, given this Supreme Court&#8217;s recent middle finger to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thuggery,  Dissent = Treason,  Our Dying Democracy</p>
<p>         	 	And as others have put it much more eloquently than me, given this Supreme Court&#8217;s recent middle finger to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-114042</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-114042</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They aren’t women.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, some were. There have been women and children at Gitmo and at other US detainment centers. They have been raped, murdered and tortured. And there are photos and video of the same. This has been kept from you by the media but your congress person does know and has seen the material. The US is one of the most heavily censored countries on the Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They aren’t women.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, some were. There have been women and children at Gitmo and at other US detainment centers. They have been raped, murdered and tortured. And there are photos and video of the same. This has been kept from you by the media but your congress person does know and has seen the material. The US is one of the most heavily censored countries on the Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113969</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113969</guid>
		<description>The decision to take these cases on was originally urged by three liberal justices with Stevens and Kennedy taking a wait and see approach.  At this stage it took five justices to take up this case.  Dimes to dollars it was Stevens and Kennedy.

A four liberals plus Kennedy coalition is quite likely to rule the right way on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision to take these cases on was originally urged by three liberal justices with Stevens and Kennedy taking a wait and see approach.  At this stage it took five justices to take up this case.  Dimes to dollars it was Stevens and Kennedy.</p>
<p>A four liberals plus Kennedy coalition is quite likely to rule the right way on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113950</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113950</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I would not be surprised if they held that habeas corpus can be suspended if “national security” is at risk, and that holding prisoners without charges at Guantanamo — outside of the rule of both U.S. and international law — is a valid action in wartime.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, you&#039;re worried that the Roberts court will overturn the dead letter of &lt;em&gt;ex parte Merryman&lt;/em&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I would not be surprised if they held that habeas corpus can be suspended if “national security” is at risk, and that holding prisoners without charges at Guantanamo — outside of the rule of both U.S. and international law — is a valid action in wartime.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, you&#8217;re worried that the Roberts court will overturn the dead letter of <em>ex parte Merryman</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhaela Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhaela Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113925</guid>
		<description>P.S. As for the Supreme Court&#039;s awful decision yesterday, I already drew up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mikhaela.net/2007/06/new-toon-resegregation-nation-or.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a cartoon &lt;/a&gt;and wrote a longish &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mikhaela.net/2007/06/new-toon-resegregation-nation-or.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt;.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. As for the Supreme Court&#8217;s awful decision yesterday, I already drew up <a href="http://www.mikhaela.net/2007/06/new-toon-resegregation-nation-or.html" rel="nofollow">a cartoon </a>and wrote a longish <a href="http://www.mikhaela.net/2007/06/new-toon-resegregation-nation-or.html" rel="nofollow">blog post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhaela Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113923</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhaela Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113923</guid>
		<description>I feel the same way Jill. I heard the Center for Constitutional Rights just now saying they were optimistic about this, but after the rash of crazy disgusting racist and sexist rulings issued recently, I don&#039;t trust it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the same way Jill. I heard the Center for Constitutional Rights just now saying they were optimistic about this, but after the rash of crazy disgusting racist and sexist rulings issued recently, I don&#8217;t trust it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113902</guid>
		<description>But they are brown. Mostly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they are brown. Mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scootermom</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113887</link>
		<dc:creator>scootermom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/06/29/not-good/#comment-113887</guid>
		<description>I too have mixed feelings about this one.  I have come to the conclusion that the Guantanamo prisoners could actually get some relief from the Supreme Court.  Their human rights could actually be recognized and their legal rights respected.

They aren&#039;t women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have mixed feelings about this one.  I have come to the conclusion that the Guantanamo prisoners could actually get some relief from the Supreme Court.  Their human rights could actually be recognized and their legal rights respected.</p>
<p>They aren&#8217;t women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.037 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 00:28:11 -->
