I have to admit, however, that the second case troubles me a bit, and I hope I can hunt up some good analysis of the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, so I can figure out whether this is going to be one of those circumstances where pleasure at the result blinds us to problems with the law. I don’t know if that’s going to be the case, and I’m not assuming that it will. I’m just a bit troubled by it, as – from the little that’s posted here – it seems like it could be something that would be potentially problematic from a Free Exercise point of view. But those are always the stickiest wickets, I suppose, those moments when the two clauses in the Amendment seem to be in tension with each other.