<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veiled and Pissed Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Korolev</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-163661</link>
		<dc:creator>Korolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-163661</guid>
		<description>Well, okay, I realized that Pakistan is not &quot;technically&quot; a theocracy, and neither is Yemen. Yet the clerics still hold a significant degree of power, and they could be &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; secular than they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, okay, I realized that Pakistan is not &#8220;technically&#8221; a theocracy, and neither is Yemen. Yet the clerics still hold a significant degree of power, and they could be <em>more</em> secular than they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korolev</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-163659</link>
		<dc:creator>Korolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-163659</guid>
		<description>The main problem with extreme fundamentalist Islam (like in Saudi Arabia), is that they really do separate women and men into different categories - they literally see women has not being the &quot;same&quot; people as men, which to me sounds like inherent discrimination.

Now not all Muslims have the mind-set of the Saudi Government. Not all Muslims are fundamentalist. In fact, I believe the Sufi branch of Islam is actually quite liberal (I&#039;m not entirely sure about this). And I know that not all Muslims wear the veil.

However - I can&#039;t get over the fact that women are treated differently. I know that the West has also mistreated women in the past (and present) - but that can&#039;t be used to defend theocracy.

All I want is for all governments to be Secular. By all means allow women to wear the veil if they want. Some women really don&#039;t feel comfortable taking of the veil, and I can understand that. However, the mere fact that men and women are required in some Muslim countries to wear different clothes annoys me. And yes, I&#039;m aware that in the West men are allowed to take of their shirts while women are not, and that&#039;s unfair (I personally don&#039;t think anyone should be allowed to take off their shirt, man or woman). 

My main problem with countries like Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, etc, is the fact that women are not seen as being equal to men. That annoys me. Also, they are a theocracy, which annoys me.

Secularism is the best path. It is the only rational path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem with extreme fundamentalist Islam (like in Saudi Arabia), is that they really do separate women and men into different categories &#8211; they literally see women has not being the &#8220;same&#8221; people as men, which to me sounds like inherent discrimination.</p>
<p>Now not all Muslims have the mind-set of the Saudi Government. Not all Muslims are fundamentalist. In fact, I believe the Sufi branch of Islam is actually quite liberal (I&#8217;m not entirely sure about this). And I know that not all Muslims wear the veil.</p>
<p>However &#8211; I can&#8217;t get over the fact that women are treated differently. I know that the West has also mistreated women in the past (and present) &#8211; but that can&#8217;t be used to defend theocracy.</p>
<p>All I want is for all governments to be Secular. By all means allow women to wear the veil if they want. Some women really don&#8217;t feel comfortable taking of the veil, and I can understand that. However, the mere fact that men and women are required in some Muslim countries to wear different clothes annoys me. And yes, I&#8217;m aware that in the West men are allowed to take of their shirts while women are not, and that&#8217;s unfair (I personally don&#8217;t think anyone should be allowed to take off their shirt, man or woman). </p>
<p>My main problem with countries like Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, etc, is the fact that women are not seen as being equal to men. That annoys me. Also, they are a theocracy, which annoys me.</p>
<p>Secularism is the best path. It is the only rational path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine Hagar</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-139744</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine Hagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-139744</guid>
		<description>I like this discussion so much my heart fell when I got to the last post.

I&#039;m a Muslim non-veiled girl from AUC, a good friend of Nora&#039;s actually and would just like to illustrate how the veil has become more of a social tradition than a religious one. First of all, prostitutes in Egypt often don the veil. Women walk around in skin tight clothes and flaming make-up but still cover their hair. I know a veiled girl who drinks, smokes pot and publicly makes out with her boyfriend. Now admittedly, the last example here is a rarity but it does not detract from the point here. Women, in Egypt at least, have come to see the veil as a social requirement. Those of the lower social classes feel this pressure more intensely. Funnily enough, the rise of the veil in Egypt coincides with increased cat-calling and verbal harassment ,by lets face it Fauzia, disgusting leering Egyptian assholes. Now, a few decades ago women used to dress more liberally (girls, look at pictures of your grans) but could parade down the streets in peace. I, on the other hand, have to dress like a hobo and listen to my iPod on full volume while mentally formulating a strategic battle plan to avoid walking close to any group of men. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this discussion so much my heart fell when I got to the last post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Muslim non-veiled girl from AUC, a good friend of Nora&#8217;s actually and would just like to illustrate how the veil has become more of a social tradition than a religious one. First of all, prostitutes in Egypt often don the veil. Women walk around in skin tight clothes and flaming make-up but still cover their hair. I know a veiled girl who drinks, smokes pot and publicly makes out with her boyfriend. Now admittedly, the last example here is a rarity but it does not detract from the point here. Women, in Egypt at least, have come to see the veil as a social requirement. Those of the lower social classes feel this pressure more intensely. Funnily enough, the rise of the veil in Egypt coincides with increased cat-calling and verbal harassment ,by lets face it Fauzia, disgusting leering Egyptian assholes. Now, a few decades ago women used to dress more liberally (girls, look at pictures of your grans) but could parade down the streets in peace. I, on the other hand, have to dress like a hobo and listen to my iPod on full volume while mentally formulating a strategic battle plan to avoid walking close to any group of men. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umm Yasmin</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-136389</link>
		<dc:creator>Umm Yasmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 05:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-136389</guid>
		<description>EG - the exception that proves the rule hehehehe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EG &#8211; the exception that proves the rule hehehehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-136385</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-136385</guid>
		<description>I loved the comparison of going unveiled with going topless. A muslim, unveiled, flatmate once gave me a similar answer when I offered her one of my miniskirts to go out: (She was trying it on) She said, wearing it, she would feel as I would going out without a skirt. 

I have always (and specially after that) been easy around women who wear the hijab, but I still have a hard time dealing with niquabs (When I&#039;ve come across a wearer in europe or america, if I go somewhere where it&#039;s the norm, it&#039;s obviously my problem, and I&#039;m the one who should adapt). The same way many women have been taught they are half naked with their hair on display, I have been taught that not showing or covering your face is rude, and it causes me a lot of disconfort. 

Another thing I also struggle with are young, underage girls who cover their hair, as it seems to me in many cases, it may be an imposition more than a free choice. On the other hand some teenagers are very religious, and the regulations, like those at french schools that may help some girls scape a bit from paternal control, are probably frustrating many others who just want to fulfill their religious duties. Difficult. Has anyone here started wearing the veil when you were very young?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the comparison of going unveiled with going topless. A muslim, unveiled, flatmate once gave me a similar answer when I offered her one of my miniskirts to go out: (She was trying it on) She said, wearing it, she would feel as I would going out without a skirt. </p>
<p>I have always (and specially after that) been easy around women who wear the hijab, but I still have a hard time dealing with niquabs (When I&#8217;ve come across a wearer in europe or america, if I go somewhere where it&#8217;s the norm, it&#8217;s obviously my problem, and I&#8217;m the one who should adapt). The same way many women have been taught they are half naked with their hair on display, I have been taught that not showing or covering your face is rude, and it causes me a lot of disconfort. </p>
<p>Another thing I also struggle with are young, underage girls who cover their hair, as it seems to me in many cases, it may be an imposition more than a free choice. On the other hand some teenagers are very religious, and the regulations, like those at french schools that may help some girls scape a bit from paternal control, are probably frustrating many others who just want to fulfill their religious duties. Difficult. Has anyone here started wearing the veil when you were very young?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trinifar</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135945</link>
		<dc:creator>Trinifar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135945</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking of the Buddhist monks I have known.  They wear a nearly floor length robe and shave all their body hair, not just the head, even their eyebrows.  It&#039;s a pretty dramatic statement.  The question is who is that statement aimed at?  Are they saying to the rest of the world &quot;this is the right way and the rest of you are immoral (or wrong or ...),&quot; or are they making a statement to themselves?  

Perhaps they are chosing to loose the outward trappings of conventional society in order to see more deeply into themselves.  That&#039;s the traditional interpretation.  

Frankly, I think if we all chose to not participate in superficial cultural fashions, the whole world would be better off.  We&#039;d be fighting off consumerism &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; giving ourselves a chance to look more deeply into who we really are, rather than spending lots of time and money trying to project the &quot;right&quot; image of who we want to be.   (And using that image to get attention that we otherwise would miss.)

The person who wears a veil or a monks robe or the &quot;plain&quot; dress of the Amish -- if they do it make a statement to others about their modesty or some other special quality, they&#039;ve missed the point.  The only point we can make, IMO, is to say to ourselves, &quot;I am not the image that others see, and I&#039;m chosing to live in a way that does not depend on others&#039; judgements of me.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of the Buddhist monks I have known.  They wear a nearly floor length robe and shave all their body hair, not just the head, even their eyebrows.  It&#8217;s a pretty dramatic statement.  The question is who is that statement aimed at?  Are they saying to the rest of the world &#8220;this is the right way and the rest of you are immoral (or wrong or &#8230;),&#8221; or are they making a statement to themselves?  </p>
<p>Perhaps they are chosing to loose the outward trappings of conventional society in order to see more deeply into themselves.  That&#8217;s the traditional interpretation.  </p>
<p>Frankly, I think if we all chose to not participate in superficial cultural fashions, the whole world would be better off.  We&#8217;d be fighting off consumerism <strong>and</strong> giving ourselves a chance to look more deeply into who we really are, rather than spending lots of time and money trying to project the &#8220;right&#8221; image of who we want to be.   (And using that image to get attention that we otherwise would miss.)</p>
<p>The person who wears a veil or a monks robe or the &#8220;plain&#8221; dress of the Amish &#8212; if they do it make a statement to others about their modesty or some other special quality, they&#8217;ve missed the point.  The only point we can make, IMO, is to say to ourselves, &#8220;I am not the image that others see, and I&#8217;m chosing to live in a way that does not depend on others&#8217; judgements of me.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135916</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135916</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who thinks that many headscarves are pretty?

I guess that&#039;s not the point, but with the death of hats they provide a much-appreciated contrast to a sea of hair.

I enjoy variety.

Also... there&#039;s kind of two types of modesty. If Brad Pitt walks down the red carpet wearing a $100,000 suit and a $400 haircut, certainly that could be called immodest in a certain sense...

But if he goes to the Oscars clad only in a speedo, that&#039;s surely a different beast altogether, even if the speedo only cost 50 cents.

There&#039;s two different axes there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who thinks that many headscarves are pretty?</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s not the point, but with the death of hats they provide a much-appreciated contrast to a sea of hair.</p>
<p>I enjoy variety.</p>
<p>Also&#8230; there&#8217;s kind of two types of modesty. If Brad Pitt walks down the red carpet wearing a $100,000 suit and a $400 haircut, certainly that could be called immodest in a certain sense&#8230;</p>
<p>But if he goes to the Oscars clad only in a speedo, that&#8217;s surely a different beast altogether, even if the speedo only cost 50 cents.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s two different axes there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TinaH</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135880</link>
		<dc:creator>TinaH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135880</guid>
		<description>Umm Yasmin, thank you.  Your comment &lt;blockquote&gt;They talk about freeing Muslim women from hijabs, I’ve yet to meet one who is willing to flout their patriarchy by walking bare-breasted down main-street.&lt;/blockquote&gt; made me laugh and helped me to understand.  

I get enough guff from perfect strangers when I simply (and modestly!) breastfeed in public.  Thanks for helping me understand a little more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm Yasmin, thank you.  Your comment<br />
<blockquote>They talk about freeing Muslim women from hijabs, I’ve yet to meet one who is willing to flout their patriarchy by walking bare-breasted down main-street.</p></blockquote>
<p> made me laugh and helped me to understand.  </p>
<p>I get enough guff from perfect strangers when I simply (and modestly!) breastfeed in public.  Thanks for helping me understand a little more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135847</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135847</guid>
		<description>Let me just preface this by saying I am TOTALLY LOVING this discussion about Muslim women and femenism in general. I also need to disclose I am a Connecticut born anglo-saxon who is currently serving in the armed forces and is stationed in Iraq. 
I only operate in a very small section of Baghdad and I am continually surprised by the variety of vieling I see. Young girls wearing no head covering, some with the hijab, older women usually wearing the chador all walking along the same stretch of road. In a very rare instance I see young women who are covered from head to toe with only the face uncovered, but the outfit itself is SO tight, very little is left to the imagination. Is the last one very modest? I wouldn&#039;t let a daughter of mine out in outfits that tight, but techinically she&#039;s covered head to toe.
I also served in Afghanistan three years ago, and women there still wore the burqa, mostly because thats what they always wore. Kind of like I always wear hose and slip with a skirt because thats how I was raised. Yes I don&#039;t have too, but I won&#039;t go without. 
Chasing brands names and wearing lots of make-up may bematerialistic, but not immodest. 
Please continue with the great posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me just preface this by saying I am TOTALLY LOVING this discussion about Muslim women and femenism in general. I also need to disclose I am a Connecticut born anglo-saxon who is currently serving in the armed forces and is stationed in Iraq.<br />
I only operate in a very small section of Baghdad and I am continually surprised by the variety of vieling I see. Young girls wearing no head covering, some with the hijab, older women usually wearing the chador all walking along the same stretch of road. In a very rare instance I see young women who are covered from head to toe with only the face uncovered, but the outfit itself is SO tight, very little is left to the imagination. Is the last one very modest? I wouldn&#8217;t let a daughter of mine out in outfits that tight, but techinically she&#8217;s covered head to toe.<br />
I also served in Afghanistan three years ago, and women there still wore the burqa, mostly because thats what they always wore. Kind of like I always wear hose and slip with a skirt because thats how I was raised. Yes I don&#8217;t have too, but I won&#8217;t go without.<br />
Chasing brands names and wearing lots of make-up may bematerialistic, but not immodest.<br />
Please continue with the great posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe &#187; &#8220;On Being a Muslim Woman Writer in the West&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135832</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe &#187; &#8220;On Being a Muslim Woman Writer in the West&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/11/05/veiled-and-pissed-off/#comment-135832</guid>
		<description>[...] the word about a really amazing Syrian-American writer named Mohja Kahf. If you read my post about the veil, then you’ll have read Nora’s quote from a poem written by Kahf. A particularly moving essay by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the word about a really amazing Syrian-American writer named Mohja Kahf. If you read my post about the veil, then you’ll have read Nora’s quote from a poem written by Kahf. A particularly moving essay by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.032 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 05:04:00 -->
