<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo of the Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-144002</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 06:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-144002</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The author is right when he says that cultural relativism takes us down a dangerous path; he is right that we must draw lines. But he’s wrong when he presumes that people in the “East” are backwards child-marrying barbarians, while people in the West are enlightened and feminist.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When I see arguments like this, I &lt;strong&gt;almost&lt;/strong&gt; think that conservatives have a point.

How many Americans would argue that marrying a child to an elderly man is okay?  A few Mormon nutcases on the Utah-Arizona border?

Americans are by no means morally pure, but there are some things that we take for granted that much of the rest of the world does not.  For example, the Pew Center&#039;s report from earlier this year demonstrated that 71 percent of Americans do not want women to return to our &quot;traditional&quot; roles in society.  Compare that to many Middle Eastern countries where a majority of the population opposes basic rights for women, meaning that at least some Middle Eastern women oppose their own claim to human rights.

There&#039;s simply no comparison to how women are viewed and treated in the developed world vs. the developing world.

&lt;blockquote&gt;“A Mother’s Journey”: The American photographer Renee C. Byer took this picture as part of a series about a single mother with five children and a son suffering from terminal cancer. He died in 2006.

The United States has one of the worst health care systems in the developed world. People get sick and people die every day because they lack access to adequate health care.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Huh?  What does that have to do with a child who had &lt;strong&gt;terminal&lt;/strong&gt; cancer?  Is there any evidence that his death was due to a lack of access to health care?  That statement is particularly offensive considering that the very next photo is of a severely disabled child who was never afforded access to the most basic life-saving medication that virtually every American takes for granted.  Keep in mind that most of the third world has absolutely no accommodations for the physically disabled.  There&#039;s a reason why he&#039;s crawling around with shoes on his hands rather than sitting in a wheelchair.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We in the West prefer our underage girls to be kidnapped and trafficked to the streets of London before being raped rather than going through the whole rigmarole of marriage.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, we certainly &quot;prefer&quot; that.  It&#039;s certainly not the result of a small number of predators and men who&#039;d rather not know where prostitutes come from/what they suffer.  I take it that there are no children forced into sex slavery in the East?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The author is right when he says that cultural relativism takes us down a dangerous path; he is right that we must draw lines. But he’s wrong when he presumes that people in the “East” are backwards child-marrying barbarians, while people in the West are enlightened and feminist.</p></blockquote>
<p>When I see arguments like this, I <strong>almost</strong> think that conservatives have a point.</p>
<p>How many Americans would argue that marrying a child to an elderly man is okay?  A few Mormon nutcases on the Utah-Arizona border?</p>
<p>Americans are by no means morally pure, but there are some things that we take for granted that much of the rest of the world does not.  For example, the Pew Center&#8217;s report from earlier this year demonstrated that 71 percent of Americans do not want women to return to our &#8220;traditional&#8221; roles in society.  Compare that to many Middle Eastern countries where a majority of the population opposes basic rights for women, meaning that at least some Middle Eastern women oppose their own claim to human rights.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s simply no comparison to how women are viewed and treated in the developed world vs. the developing world.</p>
<blockquote><p>“A Mother’s Journey”: The American photographer Renee C. Byer took this picture as part of a series about a single mother with five children and a son suffering from terminal cancer. He died in 2006.</p>
<p>The United States has one of the worst health care systems in the developed world. People get sick and people die every day because they lack access to adequate health care.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh?  What does that have to do with a child who had <strong>terminal</strong> cancer?  Is there any evidence that his death was due to a lack of access to health care?  That statement is particularly offensive considering that the very next photo is of a severely disabled child who was never afforded access to the most basic life-saving medication that virtually every American takes for granted.  Keep in mind that most of the third world has absolutely no accommodations for the physically disabled.  There&#8217;s a reason why he&#8217;s crawling around with shoes on his hands rather than sitting in a wheelchair.</p>
<blockquote><p>We in the West prefer our underage girls to be kidnapped and trafficked to the streets of London before being raped rather than going through the whole rigmarole of marriage.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, we certainly &#8220;prefer&#8221; that.  It&#8217;s certainly not the result of a small number of predators and men who&#8217;d rather not know where prostitutes come from/what they suffer.  I take it that there are no children forced into sex slavery in the East?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naadir Jeewa</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143914</link>
		<dc:creator>Naadir Jeewa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143914</guid>
		<description>We in the West prefer our underage girls to be kidnapped and trafficked to the streets of London before being raped rather than going through the whole rigmarole of marriage. That is our cultural fabric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We in the West prefer our underage girls to be kidnapped and trafficked to the streets of London before being raped rather than going through the whole rigmarole of marriage. That is our cultural fabric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ledasmom</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143857</link>
		<dc:creator>Ledasmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143857</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But for me, the first thing I saw were her eyes&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes - he is looking at the camera, but she is looking at him.  It&#039;s a pretty good representation of the inequalities in their positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But for me, the first thing I saw were her eyes</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes &#8211; he is looking at the camera, but she is looking at him.  It&#8217;s a pretty good representation of the inequalities in their positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143812</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 04:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143812</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the controversy and the various interpretations, I love the photo. I love it because of her eyes. She looks at him with such hate and fear. And then after reading the description, you want to help her. It works for me. I guess it doesn&#039;t work for everyone because they see other things. But for me, the first thing I saw were her eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the controversy and the various interpretations, I love the photo. I love it because of her eyes. She looks at him with such hate and fear. And then after reading the description, you want to help her. It works for me. I guess it doesn&#8217;t work for everyone because they see other things. But for me, the first thing I saw were her eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bq</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143773</link>
		<dc:creator>Bq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 21:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143773</guid>
		<description>At the end of the day, anyone who calls themselves a feminists needs to listen to and read the works of women of color/postcolonial feminist theorists and work *with* woc instead of allying with patriarchal, imperialist power interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day, anyone who calls themselves a feminists needs to listen to and read the works of women of color/postcolonial feminist theorists and work *with* woc instead of allying with patriarchal, imperialist power interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bq</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143771</link>
		<dc:creator>Bq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 21:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143771</guid>
		<description>Regarding child abuse, rape was rampant at boarding schools for indigenous children in colonialist settler societies like the US, Canada and Australia. It completely disgusts me that there are &quot;feminists&quot; like you who consider the lives of people of color cheap. It would behoove you to read intellectuals like Gayatri Spivak and Chandra Mohanty, but obviously you have no respect for women of color and are unlikely to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding child abuse, rape was rampant at boarding schools for indigenous children in colonialist settler societies like the US, Canada and Australia. It completely disgusts me that there are &#8220;feminists&#8221; like you who consider the lives of people of color cheap. It would behoove you to read intellectuals like Gayatri Spivak and Chandra Mohanty, but obviously you have no respect for women of color and are unlikely to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mold</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 21:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143769</guid>
		<description>Her family is poor.  They sell her off so that she may eat.  Not much of a choice and one we in the West are not likely to have to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her family is poor.  They sell her off so that she may eat.  Not much of a choice and one we in the West are not likely to have to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bq</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143763</link>
		<dc:creator>Bq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143763</guid>
		<description>So what happened to Abeer Hamza was &quot;civilized&quot;? Third World feminists have done a lot of work pointing out the correlation between militarism and rape. How about killing people with white phosphorous, is that &quot;civilized&quot; as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happened to Abeer Hamza was &#8220;civilized&#8221;? Third World feminists have done a lot of work pointing out the correlation between militarism and rape. How about killing people with white phosphorous, is that &#8220;civilized&#8221; as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bq</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143761</link>
		<dc:creator>Bq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143761</guid>
		<description>The ISI and the US government helped arm religious fundamentalists as a strategy to counter communism. 

Interference based on power gained from countless colonizations and economic exploitation of third world countries is not neo-colonialism? 

So you&#039;re basically saying that I&#039;m &quot;civilized&quot; now, as an Indian because of the British? Fuck you. Take a postcolonial theory class, you white supremacist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ISI and the US government helped arm religious fundamentalists as a strategy to counter communism. </p>
<p>Interference based on power gained from countless colonizations and economic exploitation of third world countries is not neo-colonialism? </p>
<p>So you&#8217;re basically saying that I&#8217;m &#8220;civilized&#8221; now, as an Indian because of the British? Fuck you. Take a postcolonial theory class, you white supremacist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143747</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/12/22/photo-of-the-year/#comment-143747</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;James is so spectacularly ignorant and repellant. The Taliban came to power in part because of US support. Does that not count as colonialism?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No it doesn&#039;t. The Taliban were an anti-colonial movement. They fought in favour of self rule and opposed and defeated the Soviet invasion. They&#039;re one of the reasons I&#039;m a big supporter of colonialism. You can say what you like about the Commies but at least they were in favour of using some seriously repressive measures to get rid of child marriage and drag Afghanistan into the twentieth century. That&#039;s more that you can say about the Taliban. For that matter it&#039;s more than you can say ablout NATO of the people currently in charge, they&#039;ve got no problem sucking up to child molesters if it&#039;ll make their life easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>James is so spectacularly ignorant and repellant. The Taliban came to power in part because of US support. Does that not count as colonialism?</p></blockquote>
<p>No it doesn&#8217;t. The Taliban were an anti-colonial movement. They fought in favour of self rule and opposed and defeated the Soviet invasion. They&#8217;re one of the reasons I&#8217;m a big supporter of colonialism. You can say what you like about the Commies but at least they were in favour of using some seriously repressive measures to get rid of child marriage and drag Afghanistan into the twentieth century. That&#8217;s more that you can say about the Taliban. For that matter it&#8217;s more than you can say ablout NATO of the people currently in charge, they&#8217;ve got no problem sucking up to child molesters if it&#8217;ll make their life easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 15/21 queries in 0.086 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 04:38:07 -->
