<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charming.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david muir &#124; Great for news</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145964</link>
		<dc:creator>david muir &#124; Great for news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145964</guid>
		<description>[...] Charming. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Charming. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Would You Rather Have A Beer With? &#171; Our Descent Into Madness</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145756</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Would You Rather Have A Beer With? &#171; Our Descent Into Madness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145756</guid>
		<description>[...] couldn&#8217;t be in the same room as John Edwards without punching him for the cheap sexist shot he took at Clinton earlier this week. I like his policies, but he gets on my nerves, and I&#8217;m really pissed about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couldn&#8217;t be in the same room as John Edwards without punching him for the cheap sexist shot he took at Clinton earlier this week. I like his policies, but he gets on my nerves, and I&#8217;m really pissed about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe » Clinton takes New Hampshire; MoDo gets out the knife</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145623</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe » Clinton takes New Hampshire; MoDo gets out the knife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145623</guid>
		<description>[...] Iowa, and concluded that the overt misogyny that appeared this week (yes, I&#8217;m looking at you, John Edwards), what with the &#8220;crying&#8221; clusterfuck and some of the nastiness in the debate, may have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iowa, and concluded that the overt misogyny that appeared this week (yes, I&#8217;m looking at you, John Edwards), what with the &#8220;crying&#8221; clusterfuck and some of the nastiness in the debate, may have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145600</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145600</guid>
		<description>and for the record, I&#039;m not suddenly going from enthusiastic about Edwards to o noez Betrayed over this; I already felt singularly &quot;blah&quot; about all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and for the record, I&#8217;m not suddenly going from enthusiastic about Edwards to o noez Betrayed over this; I already felt singularly &#8220;blah&#8221; about all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145599</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145599</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh, and Edwards is the closest we’ll get to a pro-GLBT president, but considering Huckabee wanted to put us in isolation camps, I’ll take Obama or Clinton who at least are wishy-washy instead of openly hostile&lt;/blockquote&gt;

there is that, yes.

look, I&#039;ll vote for whoever wins the general, that&#039;s pretty damn clear.  I might even put some backbone into it if it looks like it&#039;s going to be close, just because the R&#039;s are so completely fucking unacceptable.  but I&#039;m damned if I&#039;m giving them any of my money, and I don&#039;t even know if I&#039;m going to bother voting in the primaries this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh, and Edwards is the closest we’ll get to a pro-GLBT president, but considering Huckabee wanted to put us in isolation camps, I’ll take Obama or Clinton who at least are wishy-washy instead of openly hostile</p></blockquote>
<p>there is that, yes.</p>
<p>look, I&#8217;ll vote for whoever wins the general, that&#8217;s pretty damn clear.  I might even put some backbone into it if it looks like it&#8217;s going to be close, just because the R&#8217;s are so completely fucking unacceptable.  but I&#8217;m damned if I&#8217;m giving them any of my money, and I don&#8217;t even know if I&#8217;m going to bother voting in the primaries this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145598</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145598</guid>
		<description>did I mention how very not enthusiastic I am about this whole frigging election cycle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did I mention how very not enthusiastic I am about this whole frigging election cycle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145568</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145568</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton is a Machiavellian genius.  So she&#039;s lambasted for being cold and distant, is behind in every single poll, and &lt;em&gt;coincidentally&lt;/em&gt; had a little emotional choke-up in front of the cameras the day before the election?

Come on.  And it totally worked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton is a Machiavellian genius.  So she&#8217;s lambasted for being cold and distant, is behind in every single poll, and <em>coincidentally</em> had a little emotional choke-up in front of the cameras the day before the election?</p>
<p>Come on.  And it totally worked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fran</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145553</link>
		<dc:creator>fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145553</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you prefer...
All I picked up on was softness and vulnerability.  Her tactic worked, though...she came from 10 points down in NH to what appears to be a close one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you prefer&#8230;<br />
All I picked up on was softness and vulnerability.  Her tactic worked, though&#8230;she came from 10 points down in NH to what appears to be a close one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prefer not to say</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145492</link>
		<dc:creator>prefer not to say</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145492</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who&#039;s watched the darn thing three times and not been able to figure out exactly where any &quot;tearing up&quot; much less &quot;crying&quot; happened? Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who&#8217;s watched the darn thing three times and not been able to figure out exactly where any &#8220;tearing up&#8221; much less &#8220;crying&#8221; happened? Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145471</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/01/08/charming-3/#comment-145471</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jill - no comment on Hillary’s ingrained racisim? I’m anxious to know what your thoughts are on her assault on MLK last night.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Jill didn&#039;t write the post, I did.  Why would I comment about that in a post about Edwards&#039; comments?  It doesn&#039;t excuse what Edwards said; it&#039;s a separate issue.

I didn&#039;t see the MLK comments.  Do you have a link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jill &#8211; no comment on Hillary’s ingrained racisim? I’m anxious to know what your thoughts are on her assault on MLK last night.</p></blockquote>
<p>Jill didn&#8217;t write the post, I did.  Why would I comment about that in a post about Edwards&#8217; comments?  It doesn&#8217;t excuse what Edwards said; it&#8217;s a separate issue.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see the MLK comments.  Do you have a link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
