<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ann Coulter says she&#8217;d vote Clinton over McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: an anonymous kate</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148852</link>
		<dc:creator>an anonymous kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148852</guid>
		<description>Rat leaving a sinking ship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rat leaving a sinking ship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on first two weeks &#171; Knitting Clio</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148816</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on first two weeks &#171; Knitting Clio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148816</guid>
		<description>[...] to show how disgusted I am with what little coverage I&#8217;ve managed to stomach. [which includes Ann Coulter&#8217;s apparent endorsement!]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to show how disgusted I am with what little coverage I&#8217;ve managed to stomach. [which includes Ann Coulter&#8217;s apparent endorsement!]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meowser</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148809</link>
		<dc:creator>Meowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148809</guid>
		<description>She didn&#039;t say she&#039;d vote for Clinton &lt;em&gt;legally&lt;/em&gt;, mind you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She didn&#8217;t say she&#8217;d vote for Clinton <em>legally</em>, mind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148795</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148795</guid>
		<description>Really? I feel like I run across the word &quot;shrill&quot; mostly these days when people are talking about political debates, especially online, in blogs, etc. to discredit impassioned argument from relative &quot;amateurs&quot; regardless of their gender. In which case I think it makes perfect sense for Coulter, who&#039;s nothing if not amateurish.

I guess one synonym would be &quot;strident,&quot; but it&#039;s lacks as many negative connotations (again, regardless of gender). Ultimately I&#039;d be in favor of using shrill for any gender (and I do) but if it seems problematic, I&#039;d be happy to substitute strident or vitriolic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I feel like I run across the word &#8220;shrill&#8221; mostly these days when people are talking about political debates, especially online, in blogs, etc. to discredit impassioned argument from relative &#8220;amateurs&#8221; regardless of their gender. In which case I think it makes perfect sense for Coulter, who&#8217;s nothing if not amateurish.</p>
<p>I guess one synonym would be &#8220;strident,&#8221; but it&#8217;s lacks as many negative connotations (again, regardless of gender). Ultimately I&#8217;d be in favor of using shrill for any gender (and I do) but if it seems problematic, I&#8217;d be happy to substitute strident or vitriolic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacqui583</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148793</link>
		<dc:creator>jacqui583</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148793</guid>
		<description>While I whole-heartedly agree with your comments, do we need to use the term &quot;shrill&quot;?  Being as it&#039;s a put-down thrown at outspoken women - and only women - I think we can bash Anne without adding sexist put-downs into the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I whole-heartedly agree with your comments, do we need to use the term &#8220;shrill&#8221;?  Being as it&#8217;s a put-down thrown at outspoken women &#8211; and only women &#8211; I think we can bash Anne without adding sexist put-downs into the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobes</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148790</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148790</guid>
		<description>Oh the irony. This is the woman who made the off-hand remark that if we could just take away women&#039;s rights to vote we&#039;d never have another democrat in office...

Now Coulter&#039;s talking about campaigning for a FEMALE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT?? 

What....the....deuce?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the irony. This is the woman who made the off-hand remark that if we could just take away women&#8217;s rights to vote we&#8217;d never have another democrat in office&#8230;</p>
<p>Now Coulter&#8217;s talking about campaigning for a FEMALE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT?? </p>
<p>What&#8230;.the&#8230;.deuce?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chang'e</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148788</link>
		<dc:creator>chang'e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148788</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry...is the apocalypse nigh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry&#8230;is the apocalypse nigh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mnemosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148774</link>
		<dc:creator>Mnemosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148774</guid>
		<description>I wish I could forward this clip to the people on the Pandagon election thread who were freaking themselves out over the thought that John McCain Would Rule All because he&#039;s so beloved by both Republicans and Democrats.  

He ain&#039;t.  Much of the Republican media, including Coulter and Limbaugh, hate the guy&#039;s guts.  He may be able to win over some independents, but ironically he may end up in the same position that Democrats have been stuck into:  are you going to vote for the actual liberal or the weak-kneed imitation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could forward this clip to the people on the Pandagon election thread who were freaking themselves out over the thought that John McCain Would Rule All because he&#8217;s so beloved by both Republicans and Democrats.  </p>
<p>He ain&#8217;t.  Much of the Republican media, including Coulter and Limbaugh, hate the guy&#8217;s guts.  He may be able to win over some independents, but ironically he may end up in the same position that Democrats have been stuck into:  are you going to vote for the actual liberal or the weak-kneed imitation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148770</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/02/01/ann-coulter-says-shed-vote-clinton-over-mccain/#comment-148770</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m just loving the fact that this is what the Republican Party is being reduced to. Couldn&#039;t happen to a nicer bunch of folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m just loving the fact that this is what the Republican Party is being reduced to. Couldn&#8217;t happen to a nicer bunch of folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
