Gotta love Feminazi style equality.

What’s a feminazi, Mel?

Actually, don’t bother answering. Ad homs are frowned on in these parts. Buh bye.

It’s not. It took over 40 years of Feminist brainwashing, and even now, the attitudes are shifting back towards nurturing and child rearing. Read “Nine in ten working women want to quit to become housewives” –
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=412178&in_page_id=1770

I love it how Feminazis completely disregard science when saying that gender roles are ’socially constructed.’ I suggest you wiki testosterone.

Also see: “Modern Women ‘Happy To Be Housewives’”
http://www.lifestyleextra.com/ShowStory.asp?Story=BZ227713T&catid=3&headline=modern_women_happy_to_be_housewives

““No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.”

– Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18″”

This has been confirmed by the above polls. SO much for your Feminazi ‘choice.’ No wonder you have a banner up on this page that asks incredulously: “A feminist and a housewife?”

“”Yeah, that’s why the idealized male romance hero sacrificing power for love is the plot of a good 75% of romance novels, because women find that so unattractive. And those aren’t even close to being a product of feminism.”"

Yes, and the mainstream media also sells millions of copies of movies and Books that depict Black people as gangsters/dealers and Arabs as terrorists (Forsythe, Follet, Archer among others).

Men who sacrifice power for love are weak, and women cannot ultimately respect such men.

Yeah, that’s why the idealized male romance hero sacrificing power for love is the plot of a good 75% of romance novels, because women find that so unattractive. And those aren’t even close to being a product of feminism.

That’s a lot of damage inflicted on society by an “imaginary” foe

““Honey, really, don’t cry. It’s true–that shudder of revulsion you feel at having to do what your husband tells you is your orgasm.””

Revulsion? There’s your Feminazi programming for you. Masculinity is about power and Femininity is about sacrificing power for love. Men who sacrifice power for love are weak, and women cannot ultimately respect such men. These are the natural instincts hardwired into us. Feminazi social engineering has reversed gender roles by neutering men and empowering women. This serves the elite depopulation agenda in addition to driving down wages due to the influx of female workers (Corporate America scores again). Only dysfunctional feminists would consider their natural instincts as “Revulsion.” I have not seen American style dysfunctional women in any other part of the world except well, Canada I guess.

“but something tells me Mel would think that’s smashing advice.”

No actually I don’t find that smashing advice, quite the contrary. If the woman did give it to her husband when he wanted it, it would significantly reduce the probability of him seeking it with somebody else. But of course, this is where Feminazi double speak comes in. If a woman is married to a guy who doesn’t want it as much as she does, he’s unable to satisfy her needs, is provably gay, and gets divorced and has his wealth plundered. If it’s the man who wants it more, the woman does not have to put up with such “degrading” behaviour and should divorce the man (with the eventual plundering of his wealth).

Gotta love Feminazi style equality.

“Sauron fell, mel.”

I know, I saw the movies, but Feminazi ‘academics’ spew their own brand of fantasy.

“Honey, really, don’t cry. It’s true–that shudder of revulsion you feel at having to do what your husband tells you is your orgasm.”

I wish i could remember where I read it (some blog or other) that described a couple going to John Grey for marriage counseling – you know that douche who wrote the Venus/Mars crap.

Apparently, the husband wanted to have sex more often then the wife. Mr. Grey’s “solution” was for the wife to give the hubby “quickies” – whenever *he* wanted them, and in exchange he’d give her “gourmet sex” once or twice a month.

So basically, if she’d just let her husband use her so he can enjoy sex 100% of the time, even when she didn’t want to have sex, then he’d “allow” her to enjoy sex maybe 25% of the time.

Why she didn’t fire that douche and demand a divorce right there, I don’t know.

but something tells me Mel would think that’s smashing advice.

Surrender to your husbands’s desires whenever he has them and he might get around to letting you enjoy it a few times a month. Just let him use you like a blow up doll and everything will be fine. This will bring you closer together, totally!

That female surrender = orgasm has been stated by sex and marriage consolers for a while now.

Heh. Heh heh heh. So when I come during masturbation am I surrendering to myself? Or is myself in charge?

Actually I can totally see this being advocated by “consolers”–people who attempt to console you for terribly inequitable marriage: “Honey, really, don’t cry. It’s true–that shudder of revulsion you feel at having to do what your husband tells you is your orgasm.”

Sauron fell, mel.

:lol: excellent.

It’s funny how he confuses trendy popularity with reality though, huh.

I mean, there’s absolutely never been cases where scam artists will sell unhappy people a load of rotten baloney that doesn’t actually work or do anything positive at all just for cash, at all.

Nah – it’s the *cue the danger music* imaginary femnazis!

Of course the feminazis who serve the elite social engineering agenda will claim that this is false and is the construct of “Patriarchy” , the Sauron of the Feminist world view.

Sauron fell, mel.

For example… I’m really controlling, stubborn and independent. I would never feel right letting my BF choose what I wore, what I ate, what I did that night. I wouldn’t feel comfortable with him controlling MY life.

But I’m a little submissive in the bedroom (not all out BDSM, but I don’t like to be in control), and for my boyfriend to see me being kinky, I have to be telling him what to do.

I don’t think you have to entirely throw away an equal relationship just to improve your sex life. Nor do I think that problems in the bedroom are just that. Usually there’s something else going on in the relationship that needs to be fixed first. And maybe that thing is a lack of an equally respectful, caring partner.