<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PETA misogyny strikes again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4 the ethical treatment of human and non-human animals &#171; strength never power</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-283970</link>
		<dc:creator>4 the ethical treatment of human and non-human animals &#171; strength never power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-283970</guid>
		<description>[...] and non-human&#160;animals 05/03/2008, 13:00  Filed under: peta  thank god feministe &amp; readers address a new example of peta sexism, so i don&#8217;t have to&#8230; for the five millionth time. i was especially glad to see that all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and non-human&nbsp;animals 05/03/2008, 13:00  Filed under: peta  thank god feministe &amp; readers address a new example of peta sexism, so i don&#8217;t have to&#8230; for the five millionth time. i was especially glad to see that all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why, PETA? Why? &#171; Fleshy + Zaftig</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-226626</link>
		<dc:creator>Why, PETA? Why? &#171; Fleshy + Zaftig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-226626</guid>
		<description>[...] is fucking disgusting.  PETA&#8217;s misogynist tendencies were enough for me to steer clear of anything having to do with them, but now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is fucking disgusting.  PETA&#8217;s misogynist tendencies were enough for me to steer clear of anything having to do with them, but now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETA, Female Sexuality, and the &#8220;Feminist Critique&#8221; &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-224205</link>
		<dc:creator>PETA, Female Sexuality, and the &#8220;Feminist Critique&#8221; &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-224205</guid>
		<description>[...] critique.” Being a long-time committed feminist myself, I frequently agree with both BlogHer and Feministe. But unfortunately, they and their supporters are critiquing the wrong thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] critique.” Being a long-time committed feminist myself, I frequently agree with both BlogHer and Feministe. But unfortunately, they and their supporters are critiquing the wrong thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Very Political Woman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AVPW&#8217;s Cut The Games Anti-Award: PETA&#8217;s Big Sexism Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-223509</link>
		<dc:creator>A Very Political Woman &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AVPW&#8217;s Cut The Games Anti-Award: PETA&#8217;s Big Sexism Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-223509</guid>
		<description>[...] accounts of PETA&#8217;s completely abhorrent record of sexist ad campaigns.  For example, there was the demonstration with the pregnant woman posed on all fours to somehow urge people to &amp;#8....&#8221;  Then there was the ad  that likened the division of meat in a cow&#8217;s body to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accounts of PETA&#8217;s completely abhorrent record of sexist ad campaigns.  For example, there was the demonstration with the pregnant woman posed on all fours to somehow urge people to &amp;#8&#8230;.&#8221;  Then there was the ad  that likened the division of meat in a cow&#8217;s body to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: appletree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Love animals? Forget PETA. Give to the Humane Society.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-176986</link>
		<dc:creator>appletree &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Love animals? Forget PETA. Give to the Humane Society.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-176986</guid>
		<description>[...] than the antics of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Associating animal welfare with sadistic pornography and trivialization of the Holocaust just makes the issue seem stupid and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than the antics of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Associating animal welfare with sadistic pornography and trivialization of the Holocaust just makes the issue seem stupid and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bullshit sandwich. &#171; Because it&#8217;s our prerogative</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-176146</link>
		<dc:creator>Bullshit sandwich. &#171; Because it&#8217;s our prerogative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-176146</guid>
		<description>[...] Between condemning &#8220;flesh-eating death-masters,&#8221; forcing infants to be vegan and PETA&#8217;s disgusting use of women&#8217;s bodies to sell vegetarianism (a methodology that, quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Between condemning &#8220;flesh-eating death-masters,&#8221; forcing infants to be vegan and PETA&#8217;s disgusting use of women&#8217;s bodies to sell vegetarianism (a methodology that, quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naadir Jeewa</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-156191</link>
		<dc:creator>Naadir Jeewa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-156191</guid>
		<description>Living in the UK, I&#039;m clearly not familiar with PETA&#039;s ouvre of work. Which came first? This stunt, or the Arrested Development sketch when Lindsay Bluthe (Portia de Rossi) takes a little too much pleasure in being hosed down in a cage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Living in the UK, I&#8217;m clearly not familiar with PETA&#8217;s ouvre of work. Which came first? This stunt, or the Arrested Development sketch when Lindsay Bluthe (Portia de Rossi) takes a little too much pleasure in being hosed down in a cage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Litter Box Award: Peta&#8217;s latest sexualized stunt</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-155941</link>
		<dc:creator>Litter Box Award: Peta&#8217;s latest sexualized stunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 03:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-155941</guid>
		<description>[...] Feministe sums up my view of Peta&#8217;s latest sexualized stunt really well - once again Peta belongs in the litter box.  Animal liberation theory does intersect with feminist theory, and our cultural understanding of animals and food (and animals as food, and women-as-meat) is heavily gendered. But PETA is promoting animal rights at the expense of women’s rights — and that’s not only simplistic, but it’s bad for everyone involved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feministe sums up my view of Peta&#8217;s latest sexualized stunt really well &#8211; once again Peta belongs in the litter box.  Animal liberation theory does intersect with feminist theory, and our cultural understanding of animals and food (and animals as food, and women-as-meat) is heavily gendered. But PETA is promoting animal rights at the expense of women’s rights — and that’s not only simplistic, but it’s bad for everyone involved. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruxandra</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-155739</link>
		<dc:creator>ruxandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-155739</guid>
		<description>yes, though lauredhel&#039;s point was a bit more complex, as she explained. my understanding is that her question was more along the lines of whether &lt;i&gt;in this culture&lt;/i&gt; one could ever have a campaign making use of a naked female body that &lt;i&gt;wasn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; inherently misogynistic (seeing as some people argue that there&#039;s nothing inherently wrong with the use of female bodies for sex work). but, yeah, the most basic distinction is in who&#039;s being criticised and for what, who&#039;s doing the &quot;selling&quot; and in the name of what - that&#039;s definitely part of what i&#039;ve been getting at too. 

ps: it actually wasn&#039;t me who made the point about putting men in cages and actually peta &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; sometimes use naked men in their campaigns, too (as they will be VERY eager to point out to you if you criticise them.) the thing is, that&#039;s an exception to the rule so it doesn&#039;t mean much, and besides a lot of the time the men in such ads are &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; presented similarly to the women so the problem remains (compare &lt;a href=&quot;http://pics.livejournal.com/nicky_santoro/pic/0056y64q&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailystab.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/stevo-peta.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;. even worse, when they are also sexualizing/dehumanizing men in the same vein as they do with women, it&#039;s always &lt;a href=&quot;http://ruxi.svr.ro/peta/molacircus.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;men of color&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (i haven&#039;t found even one exception: if they use naked men it&#039;s either non-gratuitous/non-sexual or - they&#039;re men of color). so, yeah. peta knows very well what it&#039;s doing with all of this, and it&#039;s anything but &quot;ethical.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, though lauredhel&#8217;s point was a bit more complex, as she explained. my understanding is that her question was more along the lines of whether <i>in this culture</i> one could ever have a campaign making use of a naked female body that <i>wasn&#8217;t</i> inherently misogynistic (seeing as some people argue that there&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with the use of female bodies for sex work). but, yeah, the most basic distinction is in who&#8217;s being criticised and for what, who&#8217;s doing the &#8220;selling&#8221; and in the name of what &#8211; that&#8217;s definitely part of what i&#8217;ve been getting at too. </p>
<p>ps: it actually wasn&#8217;t me who made the point about putting men in cages and actually peta <i>does</i> sometimes use naked men in their campaigns, too (as they will be VERY eager to point out to you if you criticise them.) the thing is, that&#8217;s an exception to the rule so it doesn&#8217;t mean much, and besides a lot of the time the men in such ads are <i>not</i> presented similarly to the women so the problem remains (compare <a href="http://pics.livejournal.com/nicky_santoro/pic/0056y64q" rel="nofollow">this</a> and <a href="http://dailystab.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/stevo-peta.jpg" rel="nofollow">this</a>. even worse, when they are also sexualizing/dehumanizing men in the same vein as they do with women, it&#8217;s always <a href="http://ruxi.svr.ro/peta/molacircus.jpg" rel="nofollow"><i>men of color</i></a> (i haven&#8217;t found even one exception: if they use naked men it&#8217;s either non-gratuitous/non-sexual or &#8211; they&#8217;re men of color). so, yeah. peta knows very well what it&#8217;s doing with all of this, and it&#8217;s anything but &#8220;ethical.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Boondoggle</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-155723</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Boondoggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/04/peta-misogyny-strikes-again/#comment-155723</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;PETA isn’t in the position of the women who are doing sex work — they’re in the position of the pornographers and strip club owners doing the exploiting. They’re pimping women out to promote themselves.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Prezactly.    This isn&#039;t about the woman in the picture chosing to protest like this.  It&#039;s about PETA&#039;s history of using women to promote themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>PETA isn’t in the position of the women who are doing sex work — they’re in the position of the pornographers and strip club owners doing the exploiting. They’re pimping women out to promote themselves.</p></blockquote>
<p>Prezactly.    This isn&#8217;t about the woman in the picture chosing to protest like this.  It&#8217;s about PETA&#8217;s history of using women to promote themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
