<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little bit more&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Danakitty</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159614</link>
		<dc:creator>Danakitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159614</guid>
		<description>I believe issues like spousal infidelity should be kept private. It&#039;s really none of the public&#039;s concern. While I feel Paterson probably did a pretty good move, considering the state of the press at the time, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s really any of our business what he and/or his wife did when they were having marital problems. 

However, I do feel that it&#039;s in the public&#039;s interest to know when a political figure/CEO/celebrity/John Q. Public is doing something illegal. First of all, if you&#039;re in a position of power or influence, others have the right to see you as you really are. So if you&#039;re a hypocrite, we&#039;ll know not to vote for you. Or if you could be putting others in danger, well... yeah, I would like to know if my next door neighbor is a sex offender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe issues like spousal infidelity should be kept private. It&#8217;s really none of the public&#8217;s concern. While I feel Paterson probably did a pretty good move, considering the state of the press at the time, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really any of our business what he and/or his wife did when they were having marital problems. </p>
<p>However, I do feel that it&#8217;s in the public&#8217;s interest to know when a political figure/CEO/celebrity/John Q. Public is doing something illegal. First of all, if you&#8217;re in a position of power or influence, others have the right to see you as you really are. So if you&#8217;re a hypocrite, we&#8217;ll know not to vote for you. Or if you could be putting others in danger, well&#8230; yeah, I would like to know if my next door neighbor is a sex offender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ol cranky</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159471</link>
		<dc:creator>ol cranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159471</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CEOs are asked to step down because of financial improprieties or mishandling of stockholder money or embezzlement or incompetence. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

CEOs generally get rather nice severance packages when they are forced to step down for those reasons (and there&#039;s often a nice statement of support for them made to the public and the employees to maintain their dignity and alow them to go on to ruin another company)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CEOs are asked to step down because of financial improprieties or mishandling of stockholder money or embezzlement or incompetence. </p></blockquote>
<p>CEOs generally get rather nice severance packages when they are forced to step down for those reasons (and there&#8217;s often a nice statement of support for them made to the public and the employees to maintain their dignity and alow them to go on to ruin another company)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astraea</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159317</link>
		<dc:creator>Astraea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159317</guid>
		<description>Um, pointing out a sexist use of the word &quot;men&quot; is the same as saying men are evil and women are perfect, how?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, pointing out a sexist use of the word &#8220;men&#8221; is the same as saying men are evil and women are perfect, how?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAS</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159311</link>
		<dc:creator>DAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159311</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;note the use of the word MEN here.&lt;/i&gt;

Let&#039;s be careful here.  While I certainly would agree that we need to go beyond this whole &quot;virtuous MAN&quot; (note my slight change of words to etymologically illustrate what&#039;s going on here -- the tying of moral goodness to manliness -- and to class ... to those who can afford to be virtuous -- is an inherent feature in &quot;virtue&quot; ethics) thing, it isn&#039;t as if women don&#039;t have affairs too.  This blog would be the last place (or one of the last places) I&#039;d expect to see &quot;men can&#039;t keep it in their pants, but women can&quot; gender essentialism.

IIRC, not only was the governor un-faithful, but his wife was unfaithful as well -- we&#039;d still be having this conversation if a woman was the governor if that woman was the current NY gov&#039;s wife, e.g.  Of course, given the sexism of the media, you&#039;d imagine it would be even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>note the use of the word MEN here.</i></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be careful here.  While I certainly would agree that we need to go beyond this whole &#8220;virtuous MAN&#8221; (note my slight change of words to etymologically illustrate what&#8217;s going on here &#8212; the tying of moral goodness to manliness &#8212; and to class &#8230; to those who can afford to be virtuous &#8212; is an inherent feature in &#8220;virtue&#8221; ethics) thing, it isn&#8217;t as if women don&#8217;t have affairs too.  This blog would be the last place (or one of the last places) I&#8217;d expect to see &#8220;men can&#8217;t keep it in their pants, but women can&#8221; gender essentialism.</p>
<p>IIRC, not only was the governor un-faithful, but his wife was unfaithful as well &#8212; we&#8217;d still be having this conversation if a woman was the governor if that woman was the current NY gov&#8217;s wife, e.g.  Of course, given the sexism of the media, you&#8217;d imagine it would be even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigh</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159298</link>
		<dc:creator>sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159298</guid>
		<description>manju your stupid is showiing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>manju your stupid is showiing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lethal</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159279</link>
		<dc:creator>lethal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159279</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;CEOs are asked to step down because of financial improprieties or mishandling of stockholder money or embezzlement or incompetence.&lt;/i&gt;

ASKED TO STEP DOWN, yes.  Thrown in jail for life?  No.  If they were black and poor and stole that much money, they&#039;d never see daylight again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>CEOs are asked to step down because of financial improprieties or mishandling of stockholder money or embezzlement or incompetence.</i></p>
<p>ASKED TO STEP DOWN, yes.  Thrown in jail for life?  No.  If they were black and poor and stole that much money, they&#8217;d never see daylight again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lethal</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159278</link>
		<dc:creator>lethal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159278</guid>
		<description>Johns hardly ever get arrested while sex workers get locked up and raped (by police in addition to others) on a daily basis.  Give me a goddamn break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johns hardly ever get arrested while sex workers get locked up and raped (by police in addition to others) on a daily basis.  Give me a goddamn break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159265</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159265</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m pretty sure a CEO at a publicly traded company having sexual relations with an intern would result in termination.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

unless s/he is an underage intern i doubt it. I can&#039;t be sure, and obviously every case is dif., but I know at a top law firm in New York paralegals have relationships with lawyers and/or partners at the firm - and while each individual case may or may not be frowned upon - it definitely will not lead to the termination of anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m pretty sure a CEO at a publicly traded company having sexual relations with an intern would result in termination.</p></blockquote>
<p>unless s/he is an underage intern i doubt it. I can&#8217;t be sure, and obviously every case is dif., but I know at a top law firm in New York paralegals have relationships with lawyers and/or partners at the firm &#8211; and while each individual case may or may not be frowned upon &#8211; it definitely will not lead to the termination of anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libdevil</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159260</link>
		<dc:creator>libdevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159260</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CEOs are asked to step down because of financial improprieties or mishandling of stockholder money or embezzlement or incompetence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ideally, yes.  But look at how many companies are looted by their executives, when there&#039;s no reasonable way they could have hidden their activities from others inside the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CEOs are asked to step down because of financial improprieties or mishandling of stockholder money or embezzlement or incompetence.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ideally, yes.  But look at how many companies are looted by their executives, when there&#8217;s no reasonable way they could have hidden their activities from others inside the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159250</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/20/a-little-bit-more/#comment-159250</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wait, did I miss something? Was secret nefarious deed discovered about the new governor?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What Mnemosyne said, though he didn&#039;t reveal anything before the swearing-in.  But he and his wife did hold a press conference in which they answered questions about their infidelities, with the express purpose of making sure he couldn&#039;t be blackmailed.  In fact, apparently, the reason that Spitzer didn&#039;t resign until Monday apparently had a lot to do with Paterson needing to figure out how to handle this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wait, did I miss something? Was secret nefarious deed discovered about the new governor?</p></blockquote>
<p>What Mnemosyne said, though he didn&#8217;t reveal anything before the swearing-in.  But he and his wife did hold a press conference in which they answered questions about their infidelities, with the express purpose of making sure he couldn&#8217;t be blackmailed.  In fact, apparently, the reason that Spitzer didn&#8217;t resign until Monday apparently had a lot to do with Paterson needing to figure out how to handle this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.039 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 04:39:19 -->
