<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just a wife.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Feministe » Everything I know about foreign policy, I learned in kindergarten</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-162983</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe » Everything I know about foreign policy, I learned in kindergarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-162983</guid>
		<description>[...] from birth to age 13. Can I be governor when Corzine leaves office? 2) As I discussed in comments to this post, dismissing the diplomacy that Clinton did as &#8220;having tea&#8221; or being &#8220;just a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from birth to age 13. Can I be governor when Corzine leaves office? 2) As I discussed in comments to this post, dismissing the diplomacy that Clinton did as &#8220;having tea&#8221; or being &#8220;just a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q Grrl</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159859</link>
		<dc:creator>Q Grrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159859</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But it is worthwhile to ask ourselves why many people don’t consider Clinton’s experience as first lady to be “real” foreign policy experience. A lot of diplomacy is, in fact, done via personal relationships and cocktail parties and receptions. Is it less worthy of consideration if you’re the spouse of the president than if you’re in the foreign service?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And this is nothing compared to the amount of business and politics that have historically happened in men-only spaces, which I guess is considered normal because it was guys doing it, eh?  A woman being a hostess in her own home must just be a stupid broad, but a young man getting invited to Augusta National is an up-and-comer, learning the savvy world of insider knowledge.  

Fuck anyone who can&#039;t see the rabid misogyny in these lines of thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But it is worthwhile to ask ourselves why many people don’t consider Clinton’s experience as first lady to be “real” foreign policy experience. A lot of diplomacy is, in fact, done via personal relationships and cocktail parties and receptions. Is it less worthy of consideration if you’re the spouse of the president than if you’re in the foreign service?
</p></blockquote>
<p>And this is nothing compared to the amount of business and politics that have historically happened in men-only spaces, which I guess is considered normal because it was guys doing it, eh?  A woman being a hostess in her own home must just be a stupid broad, but a young man getting invited to Augusta National is an up-and-comer, learning the savvy world of insider knowledge.  </p>
<p>Fuck anyone who can&#8217;t see the rabid misogyny in these lines of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159841</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159841</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see it as entirely sexist only because Clinton is exagerrating so much you would think she single handedly saved the world during her husbands administration. So I don&#039;t see someone exagerrating to the other extreme as anything but giving her a dose of her own medicine. They wouldn&#039;t be able to get away with it if she had just said that she met alot of world leaders and had some experience on the periphery with Ireland, Bosnia, Kosovo etc. Instead she has to lie and say she was right there in the thick of it making all the decisions, dodging bullets, and everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see it as entirely sexist only because Clinton is exagerrating so much you would think she single handedly saved the world during her husbands administration. So I don&#8217;t see someone exagerrating to the other extreme as anything but giving her a dose of her own medicine. They wouldn&#8217;t be able to get away with it if she had just said that she met alot of world leaders and had some experience on the periphery with Ireland, Bosnia, Kosovo etc. Instead she has to lie and say she was right there in the thick of it making all the decisions, dodging bullets, and everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159825</link>
		<dc:creator>marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159825</guid>
		<description>It is code for being a man. And yes I am well aware that it is stereotypical.

On another note, Obama won alot of states that go Republican in the general election.  It is likely they will continue that wat in November.  Obama will get the liberal voting states like New York and California, but that is not enough to win the election.   And Ted Kennedy should vote for what the people of his state want, not his personal politics.  I am praying for a Gore endorsement for Hillary, but I know I am dreaming.

Triska, is it worth ripping apart the dem. party over not nominating a woman?  Maybe not, but it is over the DNC&#039;s decision to disenfranchise Florida and Michigan.  I am glad Howard Dean never became president after witnessing this massively wrong decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is code for being a man. And yes I am well aware that it is stereotypical.</p>
<p>On another note, Obama won alot of states that go Republican in the general election.  It is likely they will continue that wat in November.  Obama will get the liberal voting states like New York and California, but that is not enough to win the election.   And Ted Kennedy should vote for what the people of his state want, not his personal politics.  I am praying for a Gore endorsement for Hillary, but I know I am dreaming.</p>
<p>Triska, is it worth ripping apart the dem. party over not nominating a woman?  Maybe not, but it is over the DNC&#8217;s decision to disenfranchise Florida and Michigan.  I am glad Howard Dean never became president after witnessing this massively wrong decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sophonisba</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159792</link>
		<dc:creator>sophonisba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159792</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Alot of feminists use the excuse that Hillary is unlikable to throw sexist commentary her way. They might as well put on a suit and throw out their purses.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Um, what? I&#039;m a Clinton voter, don&#039;t own a purse, and am wearing a suit right now. WTF is that supposed to be code for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alot of feminists use the excuse that Hillary is unlikable to throw sexist commentary her way. They might as well put on a suit and throw out their purses.</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, what? I&#8217;m a Clinton voter, don&#8217;t own a purse, and am wearing a suit right now. WTF is that supposed to be code for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159782</link>
		<dc:creator>marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159782</guid>
		<description>For more sexist bull check out Bill Maher&#039;s new rules basically saying middle-aged women are okay to cheat on.  

It is about 1:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0Zak5J2mvo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more sexist bull check out Bill Maher&#8217;s new rules basically saying middle-aged women are okay to cheat on.  </p>
<p>It is about 1:50<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0Zak5J2mvo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0Zak5J2mvo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vail</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159780</link>
		<dc:creator>Vail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159780</guid>
		<description>&#039;eh sorry about the cat fight part but my only excuse is in my house, our male and female cats do randomly fight for no good reason then are best buds five minutes later.  I can only hope we all unite behind whoever wins the primary and at least get this train wreck headed in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;eh sorry about the cat fight part but my only excuse is in my house, our male and female cats do randomly fight for no good reason then are best buds five minutes later.  I can only hope we all unite behind whoever wins the primary and at least get this train wreck headed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exholt</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159778</link>
		<dc:creator>exholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159778</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe I’ll join the Communist Party, just for shits &amp; giggles. Though that might get me on some watch list somewhere.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Zuzu,

Please consider the Greens sans Nader* or many other third parties......at least most of them do not have blood on their hands through their tacit support of Stalinist/Maoist excesses through the dismissal of first-hand critical accounts of immigrants who actually lived and suffered under the &quot;benevolence&quot; of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist rule.  

*Telemarketing shill whose attempted &quot;explanation&quot; for tacking on PIRG fees on student tuition bills without prior consent really turned me off to him.  If one feels one&#039;s cause is just, there should be no need to impose fees one has to opt-out of to exercise one&#039;s right to support/not support a given organization/cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe I’ll join the Communist Party, just for shits &amp; giggles. Though that might get me on some watch list somewhere.</p></blockquote>
<p>Zuzu,</p>
<p>Please consider the Greens sans Nader* or many other third parties&#8230;&#8230;at least most of them do not have blood on their hands through their tacit support of Stalinist/Maoist excesses through the dismissal of first-hand critical accounts of immigrants who actually lived and suffered under the &#8220;benevolence&#8221; of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist rule.  </p>
<p>*Telemarketing shill whose attempted &#8220;explanation&#8221; for tacking on PIRG fees on student tuition bills without prior consent really turned me off to him.  If one feels one&#8217;s cause is just, there should be no need to impose fees one has to opt-out of to exercise one&#8217;s right to support/not support a given organization/cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalien</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159776</link>
		<dc:creator>kalien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159776</guid>
		<description>Zuzu is absolutely right that Clinton and Obama should just duke it out at the convention.  I have learned so much more about the DNC process this year, and I think it is exciting that we have two great candidates to choose from.  Even though I voted for Obama, I would be really sad to see Clinton drop out before the convention, and I will fully support her if she wins the nomination.  She has a ton of support and deserves the opportunity to fight it out at the convention.  Also, I would hate to ever see anyone accuse her (and imply all women) of being a quitter when things get rough.  That is not the image she has been crafting for herself so why on earth should she do anything like drop out?!  The greater the distance between Clinton and Obama is the more I would hope that is reflected by the votes of the superdelegates, but given that the superdelegates were put in office by us it just shows how important it is to be aware of state politics.

The argument about following the popular vote also strikes a chord for me though, and I think that&#039;s because the sting of the 2000 of Gore losing the election despite winning the popular vote is still very present.  I know I have idealized the popular vote even though it let us down in 2004.  There is always that wonder of how different things could have been if Gore won.  

For me the fact that it&#039;s so close between Obama and Clinton means they both need to be heard.  I&#039;m looking forward to the DNC, but I&#039;m still terrified about the general election.  If McCain wins, I hope we don&#039;t end up in some sort of downward spiral of &quot;If MY candidate had won the nomination instead of YOUR candidate, we wouldn&#039;t be in this mess.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zuzu is absolutely right that Clinton and Obama should just duke it out at the convention.  I have learned so much more about the DNC process this year, and I think it is exciting that we have two great candidates to choose from.  Even though I voted for Obama, I would be really sad to see Clinton drop out before the convention, and I will fully support her if she wins the nomination.  She has a ton of support and deserves the opportunity to fight it out at the convention.  Also, I would hate to ever see anyone accuse her (and imply all women) of being a quitter when things get rough.  That is not the image she has been crafting for herself so why on earth should she do anything like drop out?!  The greater the distance between Clinton and Obama is the more I would hope that is reflected by the votes of the superdelegates, but given that the superdelegates were put in office by us it just shows how important it is to be aware of state politics.</p>
<p>The argument about following the popular vote also strikes a chord for me though, and I think that&#8217;s because the sting of the 2000 of Gore losing the election despite winning the popular vote is still very present.  I know I have idealized the popular vote even though it let us down in 2004.  There is always that wonder of how different things could have been if Gore won.  </p>
<p>For me the fact that it&#8217;s so close between Obama and Clinton means they both need to be heard.  I&#8217;m looking forward to the DNC, but I&#8217;m still terrified about the general election.  If McCain wins, I hope we don&#8217;t end up in some sort of downward spiral of &#8220;If MY candidate had won the nomination instead of YOUR candidate, we wouldn&#8217;t be in this mess.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sotonohito</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159773</link>
		<dc:creator>sotonohito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/03/23/just-a-wife/#comment-159773</guid>
		<description>Personally I think the fact that the Democratic primary is playing out so long is fantastic from both a &quot;gee, this is nifty!&quot; POV and from the POV of a Democratic partisin.  It draws media attention away from McCain, denies McCain a definate target for his own campaigning, etc.  I can think of few things better for us than this extended primary, and the prospect of a brokered convention also promises to draw scads of press.

OTOH, I do think that the superdeligate system sucks massively, its one of those ugly aristocratic holdovers best left in the past.  If one candidate enters the convention with a majority in real deligates and in the national popular vote, if the superdeligates give the nomination to the other candidate I really do see that tearing the party apart.

I&#039;m an Obama supporter.  However, I&#039;ll not only vote for Clinton, but work my ass off to get her elected if she takes the nomination, regardless of how she takes the nomination.  But if she wins because the aristocracy gives her the nomination over the wishes of the people it&#039;ll make stirring up the base vastly more difficult and possibly hand the election to McCain; it&#039;ll also leave a foul taste in my mouth when I&#039;m working for her.  I hope it doesn&#039;t come to that, I hope the &quot;party elders&quot; see sense and avoid such an outcome, but Clinton comes from the aristocratic branch of the party and I can see them protecting their own against the upstart, and in so doing wreck the whole thing.

If she gets enough real deligates or popular votes to come out over Obama, more power to her.  I can&#039;t say it&#039;d be my prefered outcome, but I won&#039;t feel cheated and I won&#039;t feel like I&#039;m betraying my principles when I work to get her elected.  But if she can&#039;t manage to get either the popular vote or the majority of the deligates I don&#039;t think it would be good for the party if she got the nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think the fact that the Democratic primary is playing out so long is fantastic from both a &#8220;gee, this is nifty!&#8221; POV and from the POV of a Democratic partisin.  It draws media attention away from McCain, denies McCain a definate target for his own campaigning, etc.  I can think of few things better for us than this extended primary, and the prospect of a brokered convention also promises to draw scads of press.</p>
<p>OTOH, I do think that the superdeligate system sucks massively, its one of those ugly aristocratic holdovers best left in the past.  If one candidate enters the convention with a majority in real deligates and in the national popular vote, if the superdeligates give the nomination to the other candidate I really do see that tearing the party apart.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an Obama supporter.  However, I&#8217;ll not only vote for Clinton, but work my ass off to get her elected if she takes the nomination, regardless of how she takes the nomination.  But if she wins because the aristocracy gives her the nomination over the wishes of the people it&#8217;ll make stirring up the base vastly more difficult and possibly hand the election to McCain; it&#8217;ll also leave a foul taste in my mouth when I&#8217;m working for her.  I hope it doesn&#8217;t come to that, I hope the &#8220;party elders&#8221; see sense and avoid such an outcome, but Clinton comes from the aristocratic branch of the party and I can see them protecting their own against the upstart, and in so doing wreck the whole thing.</p>
<p>If she gets enough real deligates or popular votes to come out over Obama, more power to her.  I can&#8217;t say it&#8217;d be my prefered outcome, but I won&#8217;t feel cheated and I won&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;m betraying my principles when I work to get her elected.  But if she can&#8217;t manage to get either the popular vote or the majority of the deligates I don&#8217;t think it would be good for the party if she got the nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
