This is really beyond the pale. And really, if the “What election sexism?” Democrats can’t see how over-the-top this is, I don’t really know what to say.
Progressives should be better than this.* I haven’t been a Clinton supporter, but the misogynist crap she’s gotten throughout the election has made me a whole lot more sympathetic towards her. There are a lot of questions to raise and a lot of skepticism to be had about both Democratic candidates — we can do that without resorting to sexist and racist crutches. And we can cut the whole “She’s tearing the party apart!” nonsense. You know what tears the party apart? Insulting and attacking the party’s base by launching racist and sexist attacks. Drawing big fat lines between Clinton and Obama, as if either he or she were the bad guy — and in doing so, giving John McCain (the real bad guy) a great big pass.
Contact the TNR editors (email@example.com) and tell them to stick to the issues — not sexist caricatures.
Thanks to Linda for the link.
*And yes, I realize that TNR is not “progressive.” But it’s (pathetically) seen as moderate to left-leaning. And it’s only one example of the nasty misogynistic attacks that have been directed at Clinton.
Similar Posts (automatically generated):
- Chris Matthews and the Chorus of Eunuchs* by Jill January 14, 2008
- Dogwhistles by zuzu February 18, 2008
- What she said by zuzu February 23, 2008
- Don’t Forget the Angry White Men by Jill March 6, 2008
- After reading this article, castration indeed has begun to look appealing. by Jill June 9, 2009