<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Sometimes the best woman for the job is actually a man&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-204539</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-204539</guid>
		<description>Interesting thread. Happy to see the debate is alive and, um, kicking. Peace, love and feminism! --Rebecca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thread. Happy to see the debate is alive and, um, kicking. Peace, love and feminism! &#8211;Rebecca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-204538</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-204538</guid>
		<description>Interesting thread. Happy to see the debate is alive and, um, kicking. Here&#039;s another post for you to reject and belittle. Peace, love and feminism! --Rebecca

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-walker/the-power-of-palin_b_128377.html?show_comment_id=15974735</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thread. Happy to see the debate is alive and, um, kicking. Here&#8217;s another post for you to reject and belittle. Peace, love and feminism! &#8211;Rebecca</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-walker/the-power-of-palin_b_128377.html?show_comment_id=15974735" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-walker/the-power-of-palin_b_128377.html?show_comment_id=15974735</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women's Space</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180169</link>
		<dc:creator>Women's Space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180169</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Democrats, Why Should We Support You?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Can we count on your support for &#8212; or even acknowledgement of the importance of &#8211; any of the following issues?
New Jersey Four
Dunbar Village
Anti-Pornography Education
Vigorous Pursuit of Sex Traffickers
Prostitution Legislation (Swedis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democrats, Why Should We Support You?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Can we count on your support for &#8212; or even acknowledgement of the importance of &#8211; any of the following issues?<br />
New Jersey Four<br />
Dunbar Village<br />
Anti-Pornography Education<br />
Vigorous Pursuit of Sex Traffickers<br />
Prostitution Legislation (Swedis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180156</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180156</guid>
		<description>I’m sorry, but where is Rebecca Walker&#039;s feminist solidarity? Do you really think she is so much more superior than the women who voted for Clinton because she didn’t engage in “reverse-sexism?” For a woman who is striving to encourage empowerment of individuals across the lines of race, gender, etc, she really doesn’t think highly of her fellow women.

She accuses women of voting for Clinton simply because of gender, but pens no response to the men who have voted for her, harking back to the stereotype that men are logical thinkers, and women are irrational and emotional. Why is it acceptable to call women out for voting for Clinton, but say nothing to the men who did? Were all women who voted for Clinton motivated by her gender, and the men motivated by her political views and campaign promises? If she’s going to continue playing such an immature game of blaming feminism for society’s problems, maybe she should make the jump and find a way to blame feminism for all the white men and women who voted for McCain, as well as all of the African Americans who were blinded by their race and voted for Obama.

Rebecca Walker hates the feminist movement and she hates empowered women. She blames it for everything that was wrong with her childhood, and she blames it for her terrible relationship with her mother. Why not blame it for her ambivalence regarding motherhood, or the way women voted in 2008? One can only imagine what else she’ll find to blame feminism for. Higher clothing prices because we dare to demand non-sweatshop clothing? Global warming because feminism encouraged us to be the women we wanted to be, so we used aerosol hairspray and put a hole in the o-zone layer? Really, Rebecca, let it go.

Hating the feminist movement from the inside does nothing to increase its effectiveness, no matter how you try to mask your hatred of other women and the movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m sorry, but where is Rebecca Walker&#8217;s feminist solidarity? Do you really think she is so much more superior than the women who voted for Clinton because she didn’t engage in “reverse-sexism?” For a woman who is striving to encourage empowerment of individuals across the lines of race, gender, etc, she really doesn’t think highly of her fellow women.</p>
<p>She accuses women of voting for Clinton simply because of gender, but pens no response to the men who have voted for her, harking back to the stereotype that men are logical thinkers, and women are irrational and emotional. Why is it acceptable to call women out for voting for Clinton, but say nothing to the men who did? Were all women who voted for Clinton motivated by her gender, and the men motivated by her political views and campaign promises? If she’s going to continue playing such an immature game of blaming feminism for society’s problems, maybe she should make the jump and find a way to blame feminism for all the white men and women who voted for McCain, as well as all of the African Americans who were blinded by their race and voted for Obama.</p>
<p>Rebecca Walker hates the feminist movement and she hates empowered women. She blames it for everything that was wrong with her childhood, and she blames it for her terrible relationship with her mother. Why not blame it for her ambivalence regarding motherhood, or the way women voted in 2008? One can only imagine what else she’ll find to blame feminism for. Higher clothing prices because we dare to demand non-sweatshop clothing? Global warming because feminism encouraged us to be the women we wanted to be, so we used aerosol hairspray and put a hole in the o-zone layer? Really, Rebecca, let it go.</p>
<p>Hating the feminist movement from the inside does nothing to increase its effectiveness, no matter how you try to mask your hatred of other women and the movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anythings.org &#187; Rebecca Walker calls Clinton supporters &#8220;reverse-sexists&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180155</link>
		<dc:creator>anythings.org &#187; Rebecca Walker calls Clinton supporters &#8220;reverse-sexists&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180155</guid>
		<description>[...] Feministe.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feministe.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feministgal</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180117</link>
		<dc:creator>feministgal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180117</guid>
		<description>Someone should teach Walker that there isn&#039;t really such a thing as &quot;reverse sexism.&quot; Sexism means to discriminate on the basis of sex/gender. This discrimination isn&#039;t one directional and whether the marginalized group is the subject of that discrimination or not, it&#039;s still sexist, not &quot;reverse&quot; sexist... 

Just like discriminating people on the basis of their skin, whether the discrimination is focused on Whites or POC, it&#039;s still racist, not &quot;reverse racist&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should teach Walker that there isn&#8217;t really such a thing as &#8220;reverse sexism.&#8221; Sexism means to discriminate on the basis of sex/gender. This discrimination isn&#8217;t one directional and whether the marginalized group is the subject of that discrimination or not, it&#8217;s still sexist, not &#8220;reverse&#8221; sexist&#8230; </p>
<p>Just like discriminating people on the basis of their skin, whether the discrimination is focused on Whites or POC, it&#8217;s still racist, not &#8220;reverse racist&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizardsRcool</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180081</link>
		<dc:creator>lizardsRcool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180081</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I will vote for Obama because he best represents my political interests, but I also didn&#039;t like him on a personal level.  My main reason is this: Basically, based on interviews and articles about Michelle Obama, it just sticks in my craw that Obama&#039;s super-awesome, hard-working, successful wife went from full-time to part-time to no-time employment, as she describes it, because of his ambitions.  Didn&#039;t she have ambitions?  She basically describes a man who is no better than most at being egalitarian in household duties, and his political ambitions came before hers.  He may talk about women&#039;s rights and even vote them, but in his personal life he benefits from male privilege without doing his best to scrub himself of it.  

This same unwillingness to separate from privilege, by the way, is something that turned me off to Clinton -- whether or not she knowingly fomented racism, she sure as hell benefited from it, and did nothing to call it out. 

 I believe Obama is rather brilliant and has a certain canny insight that is very important. But at heart, I&#039;m an empiricist -- I believe that you learn through trial and error, conjecture and refutation.   I just don&#039;t think that Obama has had enough chances to learn from mistakes, although I do think he&#039;ll be a quick study once he makes them.  But I feel like our country is so fucked up right now, and that makes me wary of voting for someone who may make political mistakes early on.  But, I&#039;ll still vote for him because John McCain scares the shit out of me.  And if McCAin wins I&#039;m moving to Canada or India or some other place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I will vote for Obama because he best represents my political interests, but I also didn&#8217;t like him on a personal level.  My main reason is this: Basically, based on interviews and articles about Michelle Obama, it just sticks in my craw that Obama&#8217;s super-awesome, hard-working, successful wife went from full-time to part-time to no-time employment, as she describes it, because of his ambitions.  Didn&#8217;t she have ambitions?  She basically describes a man who is no better than most at being egalitarian in household duties, and his political ambitions came before hers.  He may talk about women&#8217;s rights and even vote them, but in his personal life he benefits from male privilege without doing his best to scrub himself of it.  </p>
<p>This same unwillingness to separate from privilege, by the way, is something that turned me off to Clinton &#8212; whether or not she knowingly fomented racism, she sure as hell benefited from it, and did nothing to call it out. </p>
<p> I believe Obama is rather brilliant and has a certain canny insight that is very important. But at heart, I&#8217;m an empiricist &#8212; I believe that you learn through trial and error, conjecture and refutation.   I just don&#8217;t think that Obama has had enough chances to learn from mistakes, although I do think he&#8217;ll be a quick study once he makes them.  But I feel like our country is so fucked up right now, and that makes me wary of voting for someone who may make political mistakes early on.  But, I&#8217;ll still vote for him because John McCain scares the shit out of me.  And if McCAin wins I&#8217;m moving to Canada or India or some other place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180066</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180066</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;especially if your physical features allow for you to pass as White. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Mine don&#039;t.

&lt;blockquote&gt;otherwise being oblivious to racism&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Except my dislike of Obama has nothing to do with his race. In fact I&#039;m not the one who brings up his race. That would be you and all of the other supporters that can&#039;t deal with the fact that some of us don&#039;t think he is the right person for the job. So because you can&#039;t deal with you have to call someone a racist. Calling someone a racist is obviously how you choose to win any disagreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>especially if your physical features allow for you to pass as White. </p></blockquote>
<p>Mine don&#8217;t.</p>
<blockquote><p>otherwise being oblivious to racism</p></blockquote>
<p>Except my dislike of Obama has nothing to do with his race. In fact I&#8217;m not the one who brings up his race. That would be you and all of the other supporters that can&#8217;t deal with the fact that some of us don&#8217;t think he is the right person for the job. So because you can&#8217;t deal with you have to call someone a racist. Calling someone a racist is obviously how you choose to win any disagreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiggles</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180063</link>
		<dc:creator>wiggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180063</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He was one of the very very few, very very rare people in power who publically took a stand against the war.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Until he started measuring for drapes in the Whitehouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He was one of the very very few, very very rare people in power who publically took a stand against the war.</p></blockquote>
<p>Until he started measuring for drapes in the Whitehouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180062</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/06/07/sometimes-the-best-woman-for-the-job-is-actually-a-man/#comment-180062</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is further underscored due to your prior comments on the “Bookends” post where your extremely one-sided and historically uncontextualized criticism of Abraham Lincoln leads me to believe you harbor some pro-Confederate sympathies. You sure sounded like the Pro-Confederate online commenters and Southern undergrads I’ve met who pine for the “Lost Cause”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Only because you interpret not liking Lincoln or Obama as equal to supporting slavery or the Confederacy, which I do not do. These are two people who I think are given credit for the work of other people. Here in Illinois people talk about Lincoln as though he somehow was the only person who thought any of it was wrong. Read some of the speeches he gave when he was campaigning to pro-south crowds. He spoke out of both sides of his mouth.

Reality is that it was the nameless everyday people who truly put an end to slavery. there names may never get in a history book and maybe they never made speeches. They didn&#039;t have to, they lived their beliefs by refusing to stand for injustice. If you can&#039;t see that, that is you&#039;re problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is further underscored due to your prior comments on the “Bookends” post where your extremely one-sided and historically uncontextualized criticism of Abraham Lincoln leads me to believe you harbor some pro-Confederate sympathies. You sure sounded like the Pro-Confederate online commenters and Southern undergrads I’ve met who pine for the “Lost Cause”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Only because you interpret not liking Lincoln or Obama as equal to supporting slavery or the Confederacy, which I do not do. These are two people who I think are given credit for the work of other people. Here in Illinois people talk about Lincoln as though he somehow was the only person who thought any of it was wrong. Read some of the speeches he gave when he was campaigning to pro-south crowds. He spoke out of both sides of his mouth.</p>
<p>Reality is that it was the nameless everyday people who truly put an end to slavery. there names may never get in a history book and maybe they never made speeches. They didn&#8217;t have to, they lived their beliefs by refusing to stand for injustice. If you can&#8217;t see that, that is you&#8217;re problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 08:43:14 -->
