<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton Fights On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191765</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191765</guid>
		<description>OK, just have to say...reproductive rights =/ &quot;family planning.&quot;   

&quot;Women do not own reproductive rights.&quot;

Exactly the problem!  ba-dum-dum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, just have to say&#8230;reproductive rights =/ &#8220;family planning.&#8221;   </p>
<p>&#8220;Women do not own reproductive rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly the problem!  ba-dum-dum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe » I Met Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191642</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe » I Met Hillary Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191642</guid>
		<description>[...] your issue at all. They were very proud to tell us that Senator Clinton had taken the lead in combating the Bush HHS proposal to restrict women&#8217;s access to reproductive health [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your issue at all. They were very proud to tell us that Senator Clinton had taken the lead in combating the Bush HHS proposal to restrict women&#8217;s access to reproductive health [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Met Hillary Clinton : The Curvature</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191640</link>
		<dc:creator>I Met Hillary Clinton : The Curvature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191640</guid>
		<description>[...] your issue at all.  They were very proud to tell us that Senator Clinton had taken the lead in combating the Bush HHS proposal to restrict women&#8217;s access to reproductive health [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your issue at all.  They were very proud to tell us that Senator Clinton had taken the lead in combating the Bush HHS proposal to restrict women&#8217;s access to reproductive health [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aura KitKatting</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191497</link>
		<dc:creator>Aura KitKatting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191497</guid>
		<description>Damn WHY is everyone so snarky at Feministe these days ~ ???

I&#039;m glad that Clinton is taking a stand on this, but I would expect her to.  The obvious question comes to mind, is Obama?  And if not WHY NOT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn WHY is everyone so snarky at Feministe these days ~ ???</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that Clinton is taking a stand on this, but I would expect her to.  The obvious question comes to mind, is Obama?  And if not WHY NOT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191484</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191484</guid>
		<description>That cat litter thing?  So not true.  See http://www.hsus.org/pets/pet_care/pregnancy_and_toxoplasmosis.html

And yeah, I voted for Clinton after I voted for Edwards and before I&#039;m going to vote for Obama.  Why did I pick Clinton before Obama?  Because I liked her better on women&#039;s rights and gay rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That cat litter thing?  So not true.  See <a href="http://www.hsus.org/pets/pet_care/pregnancy_and_toxoplasmosis.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hsus.org/pets/pet_care/pregnancy_and_toxoplasmosis.html</a></p>
<p>And yeah, I voted for Clinton after I voted for Edwards and before I&#8217;m going to vote for Obama.  Why did I pick Clinton before Obama?  Because I liked her better on women&#8217;s rights and gay rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191469</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191469</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit late here, but...

Peter: Stop asking about &quot;the rules&quot; as if Feministe censors legitimate discussion.  You know there are no rules about who can post where.  Trying to paint the commenters who are railing on you as authoritarian jerks isn&#039;t going to get you anywhere.

Also, if you want to comment under a masculine handle, be prepared to catch some flak.  You can have the best intentions in the world when you write a post and someone might still take offense at it.  That&#039;s life.  It&#039;s worth it to take a step back and think about what others are taking offense at.

RKMK, Charity, others:  Women do not own reproductive rights.  Just because women bear the brunt of policy decisions regarding reproductive rights does not mean men can only understand the issue at hand &quot;in abstract.&quot;  Family planning doesn&#039;t not end with the woman.  All children have fathers, and though not all fathers share the responsibility of a child, some *do*.  I&#039;d say those men have more then an abstract appreciation of reproductive rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit late here, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter: Stop asking about &#8220;the rules&#8221; as if Feministe censors legitimate discussion.  You know there are no rules about who can post where.  Trying to paint the commenters who are railing on you as authoritarian jerks isn&#8217;t going to get you anywhere.</p>
<p>Also, if you want to comment under a masculine handle, be prepared to catch some flak.  You can have the best intentions in the world when you write a post and someone might still take offense at it.  That&#8217;s life.  It&#8217;s worth it to take a step back and think about what others are taking offense at.</p>
<p>RKMK, Charity, others:  Women do not own reproductive rights.  Just because women bear the brunt of policy decisions regarding reproductive rights does not mean men can only understand the issue at hand &#8220;in abstract.&#8221;  Family planning doesn&#8217;t not end with the woman.  All children have fathers, and though not all fathers share the responsibility of a child, some *do*.  I&#8217;d say those men have more then an abstract appreciation of reproductive rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191332</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191332</guid>
		<description>I know I am abrasive...and that has a lot of costs as far as how I&#039;m understood.  I guess though, I am frustrated that feminist blogs often get treated like just another liberal news blog, or something, and women&#039;s voices are just some among many.  Maybe it&#039;s unfair to ask, but I do desperately want women&#039;s voices to be privileged, for a change.  There are simply so many areas of life where they are not, and that includes areas where our voices are not privileged in *speaking about our own experience*.  That&#039;s a hard thing for a lot of men to get their heads around, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too much to ask, on a feminist blog, that you try.   And this is just the gender binary - I am aware this dynamic plays out in every other domain of culture, identity, and oppression, and is equally important to address on those grounds too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I am abrasive&#8230;and that has a lot of costs as far as how I&#8217;m understood.  I guess though, I am frustrated that feminist blogs often get treated like just another liberal news blog, or something, and women&#8217;s voices are just some among many.  Maybe it&#8217;s unfair to ask, but I do desperately want women&#8217;s voices to be privileged, for a change.  There are simply so many areas of life where they are not, and that includes areas where our voices are not privileged in *speaking about our own experience*.  That&#8217;s a hard thing for a lot of men to get their heads around, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too much to ask, on a feminist blog, that you try.   And this is just the gender binary &#8211; I am aware this dynamic plays out in every other domain of culture, identity, and oppression, and is equally important to address on those grounds too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191328</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191328</guid>
		<description>Yes, j-hoo (who may be a man or a woman), go ahead and point to me, since I was not even the first to have a certain perception of Peter&#039;s comments, and was certainly not the last.    Fascinating.  I wasn&#039;t asking for an apology, if you&#039;ll notice.  I find it striking that when a woman says something to a man about the way he&#039;s speaking about reproductive rights and the trend that grates on her, it becomes all about injustice toward the man, and somehow it&#039;s completely inconceivable for him to say, &quot;I didn&#039;t think of how that sounds&quot; or &quot;I agree there is a difference in our lived experience on this issue&quot;.  No, that&#039;s too much to ask for.  It&#039;s all about your rights, all of a sudden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, j-hoo (who may be a man or a woman), go ahead and point to me, since I was not even the first to have a certain perception of Peter&#8217;s comments, and was certainly not the last.    Fascinating.  I wasn&#8217;t asking for an apology, if you&#8217;ll notice.  I find it striking that when a woman says something to a man about the way he&#8217;s speaking about reproductive rights and the trend that grates on her, it becomes all about injustice toward the man, and somehow it&#8217;s completely inconceivable for him to say, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t think of how that sounds&#8221; or &#8220;I agree there is a difference in our lived experience on this issue&#8221;.  No, that&#8217;s too much to ask for.  It&#8217;s all about your rights, all of a sudden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191285</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191285</guid>
		<description>&quot;* To be fair, Clinton’s record on reproductive rights is as good as, if not better than, Obama’s, but I can’t recall her being this outspoken on the issues in recent history.&quot;

Clinton led the fight (with Murray) on EC a few years back.   At that time, she was quite outspoken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;* To be fair, Clinton’s record on reproductive rights is as good as, if not better than, Obama’s, but I can’t recall her being this outspoken on the issues in recent history.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clinton led the fight (with Murray) on EC a few years back.   At that time, she was quite outspoken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lalaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/21/clinton-fights-on/#comment-191276</link>
		<dc:creator>Lalaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7788#comment-191276</guid>
		<description>Peter, I&#039;ll bite.
I don&#039;t know if you&#039;re completely unaware of this (and if you are, you&#039;re probably a hermit who just now got internet access), but there&#039;s been a pretty big movement to try and bully Clinton&#039;s supporters into line by threatening them with the repeal of Roe. Some of Obama&#039;s more fanatical supporters are really making pains of themselves by shouting about how those bitter, nasty hags who can&#039;t just grow up and recognize that Clinton lost (because she&#039;s worse, and absolutely not because of any sexism - in fact, there was no sexism during the primary!) should shut up and start supporting Obama wholeheartedly because even though he&#039;s not as staunchly pro-choice as they&#039;d like, McCain is SO MUCH WORSE!!!!
So, viewed in that context, can you see why your last sentence would rub some of the commenters here the wrong way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I&#8217;ll bite.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re completely unaware of this (and if you are, you&#8217;re probably a hermit who just now got internet access), but there&#8217;s been a pretty big movement to try and bully Clinton&#8217;s supporters into line by threatening them with the repeal of Roe. Some of Obama&#8217;s more fanatical supporters are really making pains of themselves by shouting about how those bitter, nasty hags who can&#8217;t just grow up and recognize that Clinton lost (because she&#8217;s worse, and absolutely not because of any sexism &#8211; in fact, there was no sexism during the primary!) should shut up and start supporting Obama wholeheartedly because even though he&#8217;s not as staunchly pro-choice as they&#8217;d like, McCain is SO MUCH WORSE!!!!<br />
So, viewed in that context, can you see why your last sentence would rub some of the commenters here the wrong way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
