<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teh Laydeez Are So Cute When They Try To Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:23:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liminal states &#187; Is netroots non-diversity a myth?</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-204133</link>
		<dc:creator>Liminal states &#187; Is netroots non-diversity a myth?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-204133</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogging&#8217;s Glass Ceiling in the New York Times (nicely analyzed by PhysioProf in Teh Laydeez Are So Cute When They Try To Blog on Feministe) are the highest-profile treatments I&#8217;ve seen of this topic since Jose Antonio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogging&#8217;s Glass Ceiling in the New York Times (nicely analyzed by PhysioProf in Teh Laydeez Are So Cute When They Try To Blog on Feministe) are the highest-profile treatments I&#8217;ve seen of this topic since Jose Antonio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NYTimes does it again… at SoE in a new home</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-202242</link>
		<dc:creator>The NYTimes does it again… at SoE in a new home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-202242</guid>
		<description>[...] the hell do they have to post each and every article about women and girls in the &#8220;Fashion and Style&#8221; section? And then [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hell do they have to post each and every article about women and girls in the &#8220;Fashion and Style&#8221; section? And then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NY Times Continues To Totally Suck My Ass &#171; PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-198717</link>
		<dc:creator>The NY Times Continues To Totally Suck My Ass &#171; PhysioProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-198717</guid>
		<description>[...] why, why does the motherfucking Times continue to insist on capriciously covering some&#8211;but not all&#8211;blogging in the Style/Fashion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why, why does the motherfucking Times continue to insist on capriciously covering some&#8211;but not all&#8211;blogging in the Style/Fashion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would you like some cheesecake with that? &#171; Silverstar&#8217;s Magical Adventures (and assorted rants)</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-195836</link>
		<dc:creator>Would you like some cheesecake with that? &#171; Silverstar&#8217;s Magical Adventures (and assorted rants)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-195836</guid>
		<description>[...] Times talking about Blogher, and putting it in the style and fashion section. Then there was the outrage at the tone of the piece, and it&#8217;s placement in the Style and Fashion section. Then there was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Times talking about Blogher, and putting it in the style and fashion section. Then there was the outrage at the tone of the piece, and it&#8217;s placement in the Style and Fashion section. Then there was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMERICAN NONSENSE &#187; Women, Blogher, and Netroots Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-194520</link>
		<dc:creator>AMERICAN NONSENSE &#187; Women, Blogher, and Netroots Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-194520</guid>
		<description>[...] one many of the BlogHer attendees rightfully blasted: Among Feministe blogger PhysioProf&#8217;s complaints was that the story was published in the Styles section, the section of the paper reserved for trend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one many of the BlogHer attendees rightfully blasted: Among Feministe blogger PhysioProf&#8217;s complaints was that the story was published in the Styles section, the section of the paper reserved for trend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women, Blogher, and Netroots Nation&#160;&#124;&#160;Bloggers For Change</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-194488</link>
		<dc:creator>Women, Blogher, and Netroots Nation&#160;&#124;&#160;Bloggers For Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-194488</guid>
		<description>[...] Feministe blogger PhysioProf&#039;s complaints was that the story was published in the Styles section, the section of the paper reserved for trend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feministe blogger PhysioProf&#8217;s complaints was that the story was published in the Styles section, the section of the paper reserved for trend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-194454</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-194454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My god, where do all these morons come from?&lt;/i&gt;

The evidence is that it&#039;s women studies departments generating most of them.  PhysioProf was probably poisoned in the womb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My god, where do all these morons come from?</i></p>
<p>The evidence is that it&#8217;s women studies departments generating most of them.  PhysioProf was probably poisoned in the womb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking female bloggers seriously at PunkAssBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-194259</link>
		<dc:creator>Taking female bloggers seriously at PunkAssBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-194259</guid>
		<description>[...] (while still maintaining the trappings thereof, and being conventionally attractive, of course) and vocal and &#8220;unladylike&#8221; feminism, gain the temporary approval of professional misogynists. They get patted on the head and trotted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (while still maintaining the trappings thereof, and being conventionally attractive, of course) and vocal and &#8220;unladylike&#8221; feminism, gain the temporary approval of professional misogynists. They get patted on the head and trotted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikita</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-194106</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-194106</guid>
		<description>PhysioProf... I totally &lt;3 you... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhysioProf&#8230; I totally &lt;3 you&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissFrou</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/07/26/teh-laydeez-are-so-cute-when-they-try-to-blog/#comment-194057</link>
		<dc:creator>MissFrou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=7846#comment-194057</guid>
		<description>In all seriousness...

There are so many things that are beyond annoying with your &quot;teh laydeeeeez !!!!Q!!111!!!ELEVEN!!!!&quot; rant that I can&#039;t even begin to go into it all. 

Maybe if you had laid off the TEHs and the !!!ELVEN!!!s in your post, your message would have actually gotten through and people wouldn&#039;t feel the need to point out things like, oh I don&#039;t know, your flawed arguments or your grammatical errors as much.

Bitching about not being taken seriously in a way that NOBODY, including other feminist bloggers, could take seriously isn&#039;t doing us any favors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all seriousness&#8230;</p>
<p>There are so many things that are beyond annoying with your &#8220;teh laydeeeeez !!!!Q!!111!!!ELEVEN!!!!&#8221; rant that I can&#8217;t even begin to go into it all. </p>
<p>Maybe if you had laid off the TEHs and the !!!ELVEN!!!s in your post, your message would have actually gotten through and people wouldn&#8217;t feel the need to point out things like, oh I don&#8217;t know, your flawed arguments or your grammatical errors as much.</p>
<p>Bitching about not being taken seriously in a way that NOBODY, including other feminist bloggers, could take seriously isn&#8217;t doing us any favors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
