We’ve had some discussion lately about what kind of attire and personal adornment is appropriate for today’s discerning and responsible progressive feminist. These topics are a perennial favorite: should feminists shave our legs? Wear lipstick? High heels? Personally, I’ve always felt that we should trust feminists to think about the issues involved and make their own decisions, within the context of their own lives and a shared culture that wants us to do all sorts of ridiculous things. That is, as long as you all make sure to wear your feminist and lesbian uniform at least two or three times a week.
Seriously, this is the best anti-feminist rant I’ve ever read. (Hat tip to sabotabby and pandagon.) The author seems like he’s also working to expose the Rockefellers, international Zionist conspiracies, the New World Order, and probably the Bilderbergers, Freemasons, and our reptoid overlords as well.
Clearly, there are many big problems in the world that need to be addressed on his site, but I’m glad he took time to call out the Rise of Blue Jeans and the evil conspiracy it entails. More quotes after the jump, and I’ll help you understand the depths of this plot against humanity.
“Slovenly” “Drab” Unkempt” “Slatternly” “Blowzy” –many adjectives come to mind to describe most women who wear jeans.
Drab? Drab!? I may be a blowzy, slovenly slattern, but how can you be drab when you’ve used a bedazzler to make rainbows all over your blue jeans? (For the record, this makes them more gay, but possibly less feminist.)
Occasionally they are with men who are also clad in blue denim, emphasizing the unisex character of this proletarian garb.
These “couples” probably have “anti-missionary” sexual intercourse where the woman is sometimes on the top!! Possibly WITHOUT REMOVING the blue jeans, so that they have proletarian-style denim-infused orgasms. Afterwards, the woman does not even make the poor neutered blue-jean man a sandwich.
But usually these women are alone and don’t look happy. Often they look angry and confused. Usually they are talking on a cell phone or listening to their ipod.
This is easy to explain. The blue dye used for denim contains chemicals that MAKE you angry and confused, and probably cause you to swear as well. Just like an oxytocin overdose, blue denim makes it impossible for women to pair-bond meaningfully and monogamously with real men. Wearing blue jeans means women can only have cold, unfeeling, manipulative relationships where they abuse men and then suck all their money out with their blue-stained, vacuum-cleaner hoo-hoos. Then they turn to the cold metallic comfort of their cellphones and iPods. (Amanda raises the possibility that these women look angry and confused because the author of this piece was probably staring at them and their slatternly denim. But a feminist WOULD say something like that — it’s always about making it the man’s fault.)
Men, if you’re tempted by such a woman, her jeans signal that you may have to deal with her “GID” – “gender identity disorder.” Her jeans are saying: “I don’t want to be a woman. I don’t want to look good for men. I fear and distrust men. I want male prerogatives.”
After you buy your tenth pair of blue jeans, you get your free first shot of testosterone, and the right to be stigmatized by most of society, health care providers, the legal system, etc. as a gender outcast. But hey, you will get those male prerogatives, and it’s not like you could ever have those without gender identity disorder. And of course nobody is attracted to women in blue jeans! The 1980 release of these subversive Calvin Klein ads almost caused millions of red-blooded men to vomit as they saw Brooke Shields broadcasting her gender identity disorder, simultaneously fearing, distrusting, and coveting manliness. Can’t you see it in those photos? Instead, the female rump should be hidden by flowing skirts, so as to distinguish humanity from baboons.
Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.
Young women were told they were rebelling against oppressive patriarchy and inequality and all things bad. They never imagined they were betrayed by feminist teachers and politicians, who are intent on breaking up the family and abandoning us all to State and corporate control.
Blah blah blah textbook stuff yeah yeah, student has demonstrated understanding of the relevant right-wing source material, B+
They never imagined that the “women’s movement” was inspired and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation as part of their ongoing social engineering program.
You think it was CHEAP to develop the blue jean technology described above? We had to get the money from somewhere, even though everyone knows the Rockefellers are a bunch of reptilian-humanoid aliens who plan to suck us all into their pyramid-shaped spacecraft and take us back to Draco to be eaten by Lord Xenu. The thing is, if you make sure to worship them and wear your blue jeans, you will BE EATEN FIRST.
They want to destroy the family because lonely confused people are easier to manipulate. This is the real story behind the “sexual revolution.”
This phenomenon is easily observed at any shopping mall, where lonely, confused blue-jean-wearing zombies stagger in and out of the Gap, Old Navy, H&M, Target, Club Monaco, etc. responding to pre-programmed signals received by those little metal “studs” on their jeans. The messages from their jeans and iPods telling them to buy more jeans, have lots of sex, and point accusingly while screaming hoarsely at any woman who’s not wearing blue jeans.
I imagine women would wear dresses and skirts if there wasn’t a subtle feminist stigma against looking feminine. Thus women can make a statement by wearing a skirt or dress. They can show they aren’t afraid of men, and may actually like them.
Although some skirt-wearing women and men may disagree, skirts are a universally understood signal that means “I’m not a feminist, or a lesbian! I like you, Henry Makow! Please, approach me from behind and insert your manly tool. I cannot run away very fast, because of my flowing unbifurcated leg garment.”
Men should politely voice approval and support of women they see who are dressed in a feminine way.
“I see you’re wearing a dress, as opposed to those blowzy, drab blue jeans. I just want to let you know that I approve and support your femininity. Say, how fast can you move in that?”
I can still remember a young woman I saw five years ago wearing a frock. This is how powerful femininity is.
I really don’t want to know if there was anything besides the frock that made this moment so memorable.
Let’s not let pious highly-paid feminists and lesbians destroy it. It’s time for real women to relegate jeans to garden work.
But not blue jeans — preferably black or green. And only when gardening. OK, and maybe when cleaning behind his toilet too, and clearing out the gutters for him. Oops, sorry, I’ve got to go — my Rockefeller contact is dropping off another shipment of blue jeans and my weekly salary of $250,000. All praise our reptilian overlords, hissssss.
On a more serious note, if you are actually interested in the important intersection of femininity and feminism, I still recommend Whipping Girl by Julia Serano, and if you’re interested in some more analysis and discussion of the book, this recent thread on pandagon.
Similar Posts (automatically generated):
- The Pill makes you attracted to pansies by Jill October 13, 2009
- Your definition of “anti-sex” is not like mine. by Jill March 30, 2010
- The Real Stumbling Block: Movement by Jill January 24, 2007
- Chastity Clubs: Bringing the Hymens to Harvard Since 2001 by Jill March 31, 2008
- Support V-Day at St. Louis University by Jill February 14, 2008