<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;and yet somehow this isn&#8217;t getting quite the same attention as Jeremiah Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Jewcakes</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-203892</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Jewcakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-203892</guid>
		<description>Jews for Jesus terrify me.  In high school, my synagogue&#039;s comparative religion class once went to a service at a Messianic church (I refuse to call it a temple or a shul or a synagogue, since it&#039;s not) and I was incredibly creeped out by their messages.

And if anyone is up in the air about this:  as a Jew who grew up in the Bible Belt and experienced all sorts of attempted conversions, Jews for Jesus go way beyond the usual, &quot;By the way, have you thought about accepting Jesus?&quot;  It is downright coercive and scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jews for Jesus terrify me.  In high school, my synagogue&#8217;s comparative religion class once went to a service at a Messianic church (I refuse to call it a temple or a shul or a synagogue, since it&#8217;s not) and I was incredibly creeped out by their messages.</p>
<p>And if anyone is up in the air about this:  as a Jew who grew up in the Bible Belt and experienced all sorts of attempted conversions, Jews for Jesus go way beyond the usual, &#8220;By the way, have you thought about accepting Jesus?&#8221;  It is downright coercive and scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jak</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201303</link>
		<dc:creator>jak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201303</guid>
		<description>Oh fuck. I actually know the Brickners. My parents are friend with David&#039;s parents Avi and Leah. This is probably the most embarrassed I&#039;ve been in a long while. I really need to stop dismissing the crazy shit that the people around me are spouting out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh fuck. I actually know the Brickners. My parents are friend with David&#8217;s parents Avi and Leah. This is probably the most embarrassed I&#8217;ve been in a long while. I really need to stop dismissing the crazy shit that the people around me are spouting out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201274</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;gah. can we please stop waving this stick around? the incremental attacks at the state level have already rendered this law mostly irrelevant. having rights on paper means nothing if there is no infrastructure supporting those rights.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you really think that Roe is &quot;mostly irrelevant&quot;? State laws have done lots of damage to be sure, but something like 1.3 million women in the United States still manage to have abortions every year. They don&#039;t have an easy time at it, and there are many more women who aren&#039;t able to terminate their pregnancies, but the guarantees Roe provides remain crucial. Dismantle Roe -- or do what the GOP platform wants to do and outlaw abortion -- and a whole lot of those 1.3 million women are going to be facing some very dire circumstances.

Railing against state laws that limit abortion rights is certainly merited, but not at the expense of reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>gah. can we please stop waving this stick around? the incremental attacks at the state level have already rendered this law mostly irrelevant. having rights on paper means nothing if there is no infrastructure supporting those rights.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you really think that Roe is &#8220;mostly irrelevant&#8221;? State laws have done lots of damage to be sure, but something like 1.3 million women in the United States still manage to have abortions every year. They don&#8217;t have an easy time at it, and there are many more women who aren&#8217;t able to terminate their pregnancies, but the guarantees Roe provides remain crucial. Dismantle Roe &#8212; or do what the GOP platform wants to do and outlaw abortion &#8212; and a whole lot of those 1.3 million women are going to be facing some very dire circumstances.</p>
<p>Railing against state laws that limit abortion rights is certainly merited, but not at the expense of reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe » More on Sarah Palin&#8217;s Church</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201252</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe » More on Sarah Palin&#8217;s Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201252</guid>
		<description>[...] Five Reasons I Love CosmoFriends of John McCain?and yet somehow this isn?t getting quite the same attention as Jeremiah WrightI?m Too Young For ThisBabies having babies is a bad thing, Pt. 2Fighting Sexism With SexismA Little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Five Reasons I Love CosmoFriends of John McCain?and yet somehow this isn?t getting quite the same attention as Jeremiah WrightI?m Too Young For ThisBabies having babies is a bad thing, Pt. 2Fighting Sexism With SexismA Little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakistani elections linkage and more. &#171; Small-Town Elitist</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201250</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistani elections linkage and more. &#171; Small-Town Elitist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201250</guid>
		<description>[...] has a post about some anti-Semetic and barf-bag worthy comments made by a Jews for Jesus leader who was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a post about some anti-Semetic and barf-bag worthy comments made by a Jews for Jesus leader who was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cedar</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201203</link>
		<dc:creator>cedar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201203</guid>
		<description>&quot;In addition, in couple of years, if McCain wins, the chance of Roe vs Wade being reversed increases&quot;

gah. can we please stop waving this stick around? the incremental attacks at the state level have already rendered this law mostly irrelevant. having rights on paper means nothing if there is no infrastructure supporting those rights.

&quot;a club for people of any or no religious identity&quot;

what? please to be cutting out the derision for other people&#039;s belief systems. the UU is responsible for some pretty amazing interfaith initiatives, and many other *coff* &quot;Real&quot; religions could learn a few things from how they operate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In addition, in couple of years, if McCain wins, the chance of Roe vs Wade being reversed increases&#8221;</p>
<p>gah. can we please stop waving this stick around? the incremental attacks at the state level have already rendered this law mostly irrelevant. having rights on paper means nothing if there is no infrastructure supporting those rights.</p>
<p>&#8220;a club for people of any or no religious identity&#8221;</p>
<p>what? please to be cutting out the derision for other people&#8217;s belief systems. the UU is responsible for some pretty amazing interfaith initiatives, and many other *coff* &#8220;Real&#8221; religions could learn a few things from how they operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclectic Radical</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201183</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclectic Radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201183</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most Jews understand this but some are naive enough to believe fundamentalist support of Israel means they respect the right of Jews not to have to live as Christians (the right also likes to use the phrase Judeo-Christian values to make it appear as though they’re not trying to establish a governance based on Christianity).&quot;


   I wouldn&#039;t say that it&#039;s a matter of naivete. I have an Israeli friend to whom I talk frequently, as I mentioned above. In her view, it doesn&#039;t matter why someone supports Israel. The fact that they do is what is important. She is as angered by anti-Semitism as anyone, but her attitude is that Israel has so few friends that anyone who genuinely supports it is welcome regardless of motives. Many of the &#039;people on the street&#039; in Israel have a bunker mentality about life. This is why Likud consistently does well, and why parties even further to the right than Likud pick up delegates in the Knesset. Likud wants to protect them from the people trying to kill them.

   We&#039;ve seen this in the US since 9/11. The Republicans want to protect us from the people who kill us, so we vote for them even though we realize they are screwing us the whole time. And that&#039;s just the people intelligent enough to see the Republicans ARE screwing us. Don&#039;t get me started on Mr. Numbnuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most Jews understand this but some are naive enough to believe fundamentalist support of Israel means they respect the right of Jews not to have to live as Christians (the right also likes to use the phrase Judeo-Christian values to make it appear as though they’re not trying to establish a governance based on Christianity).&#8221;</p>
<p>   I wouldn&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s a matter of naivete. I have an Israeli friend to whom I talk frequently, as I mentioned above. In her view, it doesn&#8217;t matter why someone supports Israel. The fact that they do is what is important. She is as angered by anti-Semitism as anyone, but her attitude is that Israel has so few friends that anyone who genuinely supports it is welcome regardless of motives. Many of the &#8216;people on the street&#8217; in Israel have a bunker mentality about life. This is why Likud consistently does well, and why parties even further to the right than Likud pick up delegates in the Knesset. Likud wants to protect them from the people trying to kill them.</p>
<p>   We&#8217;ve seen this in the US since 9/11. The Republicans want to protect us from the people who kill us, so we vote for them even though we realize they are screwing us the whole time. And that&#8217;s just the people intelligent enough to see the Republicans ARE screwing us. Don&#8217;t get me started on Mr. Numbnuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annaleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201182</link>
		<dc:creator>Annaleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201182</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Annaliegh:

My concern is that the majority of those who don’t want to live under a fundamentalist theocracy don’t really see the danger. They either really don’t think it will happen or buy into the O’Reilly Factor war against Christmas BS.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, I think you&#039;re right about this one. Unfortunately most people have no idea about the scope of the religious-wrong&#039;s insanity. I make it a point of educating myself about it and then talking to people who might not necesary know about it as much as possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Annaliegh:</p>
<p>My concern is that the majority of those who don’t want to live under a fundamentalist theocracy don’t really see the danger. They either really don’t think it will happen or buy into the O’Reilly Factor war against Christmas BS.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I think you&#8217;re right about this one. Unfortunately most people have no idea about the scope of the religious-wrong&#8217;s insanity. I make it a point of educating myself about it and then talking to people who might not necesary know about it as much as possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ol cranky</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201175</link>
		<dc:creator>ol cranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201175</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did anyone else notice that Palin was wearing an Israeli flag pin on her lapel during the acceptance speech?

Looks like she didn’t really wrote off the teachings of her church, but embraced them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

even if it had been an israeli flag (she allegedly had one in her office) it is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; a sign she wrote off her churches teachings about Jews.  It is dangerous to conflate support for israel as some sort of support or acceptance of us Jews.  Evangelical/Fundamentalist Christians support Israel (and Israeli control of Jerusalem) for the sole purpose of fulfilling their requirements for Armageddon.  Jews on the other hand are bad and must repent for their sin of rejecting Christ by being saved (converting to Christianity).  Most Jews understand this but some are naive enough to believe fundamentalist support of Israel means they respect the right of Jews not to have to live as Christians (the right also likes to use the phrase &lt;i&gt;Judeo-Christian values&lt;/i&gt; to make it appear as though they&#039;re not trying to establish a governance based on Christianity).

&lt;blockquote&gt;I for one think that since the addition of Palin to the McCain ticket will once again drag conservative Christianity into the spotlight, everyone who does not want to see this country have a theocracy at any point needs to watch out to see how and where Palin’s religious-wrong ties go and expose them!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Annaliegh:

My concern is that the majority of those who don&#039;t want to live under a fundamentalist theocracy don&#039;t really see the danger.  They either really don&#039;t think it will happen or buy into the O&#039;Reilly Factor war against Christmas BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did anyone else notice that Palin was wearing an Israeli flag pin on her lapel during the acceptance speech?</p>
<p>Looks like she didn’t really wrote off the teachings of her church, but embraced them.</p></blockquote>
<p>even if it had been an israeli flag (she allegedly had one in her office) it is <i>not</i> a sign she wrote off her churches teachings about Jews.  It is dangerous to conflate support for israel as some sort of support or acceptance of us Jews.  Evangelical/Fundamentalist Christians support Israel (and Israeli control of Jerusalem) for the sole purpose of fulfilling their requirements for Armageddon.  Jews on the other hand are bad and must repent for their sin of rejecting Christ by being saved (converting to Christianity).  Most Jews understand this but some are naive enough to believe fundamentalist support of Israel means they respect the right of Jews not to have to live as Christians (the right also likes to use the phrase <i>Judeo-Christian values</i> to make it appear as though they&#8217;re not trying to establish a governance based on Christianity).</p>
<blockquote><p>I for one think that since the addition of Palin to the McCain ticket will once again drag conservative Christianity into the spotlight, everyone who does not want to see this country have a theocracy at any point needs to watch out to see how and where Palin’s religious-wrong ties go and expose them!</p></blockquote>
<p>Annaliegh:</p>
<p>My concern is that the majority of those who don&#8217;t want to live under a fundamentalist theocracy don&#8217;t really see the danger.  They either really don&#8217;t think it will happen or buy into the O&#8217;Reilly Factor war against Christmas BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclectic Radical</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/05/and-yet-somehow-this-isnt-getting-quite-the-same-attention-as-jeremiah-wright/#comment-201174</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclectic Radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8176#comment-201174</guid>
		<description>Ellid, you&#039;ve named five religions and a club for people of any or no religious identity. That&#039;s not &#039;most&#039; religions. As for the discussion of whether it is an issue for most mainline Protestant churches, it is. It simply goes by a different set of codes: &#039;How can we get more members? How can we get more people in the door?&#039; Mainline Protestant churches evangelize all over the US and all over the world, they just don&#039;t use the head-breaking tactics of evangelicals or the disgusting commercial approach of the Charismatics and Pentecostals. I grew up in a traditional Protestant church, not at all evangelical, and the number one discussion at many of the members&#039; meetings was &#039;How can we get more members?&#039; more often than not. All Christian denominations place some emphasis on evangelism. Many of them do it in very subtle, inoffensive, humanitarian ways. Others are aggressive and use the most savage hard sell techniques. With the exception of the Sufi, all the Islamic sects evangelize. While Orthodox Judaism does specifically forbid evangelism, many modern Reform rabbis are seeking out Gentiles interested in Judaic ideas and teaching them. That may not /strictly/ be evangelism, but it&#039;s very close. Many Buddhists /do/ evangelize. There is a whole industry in Zen education, for instance. Many Hindu teachers, admittedly not the best or most legitimate of them, do actively seek out students. There is a huge market in &#039;educational&#039; material about Taoism.

   Evangelism is the process of seeking new practitioners, of selling your religion to the potential customer. &#039;Educational&#039; material marketed for the non-practitioner with the purpose of building an interest in a particular direction of religious or philosophical thought is most definitely evangelism, even when not called such. Admittedly, many of the &#039;evangelists&#039; of major religions not concerned with Jesus or Muhammad are not the intellectual cream of their faith and many of them do not have the grasp on their own tenets they believe they do. Many of them appear more interested in money than enlightenment. That said, they exist and in significant numbers. Nor is their profit motive all that removed from the desire of Charismatic and Pentecostal Christians for more, more, and more money. Arm yourself with lots of Pepto-Bismol for your nausea and force yourself to listen to the Kenneth Copelands and Rod Parsleys sometime. They want money, just as the hack &#039;educators&#039; selling Eastern philosophy want money, and their grasp of the central tenets of their faith is every bit as flimsy.

   The major difference is that the people selling pseudo-Zen, pseudo-Taoism and pseudo-Qaballah to the American upper-middle class don&#039;t have their own political party in the United States. The people selling pseudo-Christianity to the American working class do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellid, you&#8217;ve named five religions and a club for people of any or no religious identity. That&#8217;s not &#8216;most&#8217; religions. As for the discussion of whether it is an issue for most mainline Protestant churches, it is. It simply goes by a different set of codes: &#8216;How can we get more members? How can we get more people in the door?&#8217; Mainline Protestant churches evangelize all over the US and all over the world, they just don&#8217;t use the head-breaking tactics of evangelicals or the disgusting commercial approach of the Charismatics and Pentecostals. I grew up in a traditional Protestant church, not at all evangelical, and the number one discussion at many of the members&#8217; meetings was &#8216;How can we get more members?&#8217; more often than not. All Christian denominations place some emphasis on evangelism. Many of them do it in very subtle, inoffensive, humanitarian ways. Others are aggressive and use the most savage hard sell techniques. With the exception of the Sufi, all the Islamic sects evangelize. While Orthodox Judaism does specifically forbid evangelism, many modern Reform rabbis are seeking out Gentiles interested in Judaic ideas and teaching them. That may not /strictly/ be evangelism, but it&#8217;s very close. Many Buddhists /do/ evangelize. There is a whole industry in Zen education, for instance. Many Hindu teachers, admittedly not the best or most legitimate of them, do actively seek out students. There is a huge market in &#8216;educational&#8217; material about Taoism.</p>
<p>   Evangelism is the process of seeking new practitioners, of selling your religion to the potential customer. &#8216;Educational&#8217; material marketed for the non-practitioner with the purpose of building an interest in a particular direction of religious or philosophical thought is most definitely evangelism, even when not called such. Admittedly, many of the &#8216;evangelists&#8217; of major religions not concerned with Jesus or Muhammad are not the intellectual cream of their faith and many of them do not have the grasp on their own tenets they believe they do. Many of them appear more interested in money than enlightenment. That said, they exist and in significant numbers. Nor is their profit motive all that removed from the desire of Charismatic and Pentecostal Christians for more, more, and more money. Arm yourself with lots of Pepto-Bismol for your nausea and force yourself to listen to the Kenneth Copelands and Rod Parsleys sometime. They want money, just as the hack &#8216;educators&#8217; selling Eastern philosophy want money, and their grasp of the central tenets of their faith is every bit as flimsy.</p>
<p>   The major difference is that the people selling pseudo-Zen, pseudo-Taoism and pseudo-Qaballah to the American upper-middle class don&#8217;t have their own political party in the United States. The people selling pseudo-Christianity to the American working class do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.045 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 10:03:10 -->
