Author: cripchick has written 3 posts for this blog.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

5 Responses

  1. 1
    ol cranky 9.9.2008 at 6:12 pm |

    Daisy’s 51. . .is she really considered an “older” woman?

  2. 3
    Restructure! 9.9.2008 at 9:03 pm |

    me not seeing my mother as someone without a lot of experience is deeply connected to racism, ageism, and sexism.

    Do you mean you not seeing your mother as someone *with* a lot of experience?

  3. 4
    bluefins 9.10.2008 at 9:55 am |

    As a woman of color and not American, I can say we do have banters directed at older women/men that may be interpreted as ageism. But then you are right, for most of the time the term ‘elders’ outweighs these banters in the overwhelming feelings of respect, obeisance and trust that it conveys.

    To say X is an old/er woman is no ageism/sexism in my south asian community, for it conveyes that X is likely more experienced, knowledgeable and trustworthy as a human, woman, mother, leader, adviser etc.

  4. 5
    shiva 9.10.2008 at 11:01 am |

    Hmm. Interesting. My (probably not very coherent) thoughts:

    My parents are white, non-disabled, not very wealthy but “culturally middle class” (ie, university educated and “respectable” in values), and not really meaningfully oppressed in any way other than the ways in which everyone except the mega-rich are under capitalism. I don’t talk to them about disability stuff, or any other radical/activisty stuff, because i basically know they “won’t get it”. So… i don’t think you should feel any guilt about “neglecting” your mother’s/other older family members’ “wisdom”, if their ideological standpoint is such that it’s a barrier to any sort of mutually useful dialogue.

    The 2 people i currently spend most time with are both men of roughly my dad’s generation (which is really not something i would have predicted a couple of years ago, and TBH happened quite randomly). One has been a disability activist for 20-odd years, but can have a quite frustrating attitude of “looking back at the golden days”, “no one cares any more”, “this is where it all went wrong”, etc. The other only got into disability activism around the same time i did, and passionately believes (as i do) that the disability rights movement in the UK urgently needs a new “generation” (defined not necessarily by age, but by newness of involvement) of people to get involved, to reverse its stagnation and the perception of many (both within and without) that it is “over”, has “achieved its aims already”, etc.

    On the other hand, the experience of “veterans” in the movement is also of vast importance as a body of inspiration to draw on, to not reinvent the wheel(chair) over and over again, etc. (The first person i mentioned has an incredible archive of news clippings, old movement newsletters and strategy documents, music CDs/cassettes of disabled activist musicians that were made for fundraisers, etc, which really need to be preserved for future generations of activists rather than just sitting in a few older people’s drawers as nostalgic mementoes.)

    In the disability movement in particular, i think it’s worth pointing out that the life-limiting effects of many impairments, and of discrimination in the medical system, and the toll taken by energy put into activism when, quite literally, one’s life can be on the line, mean that there are fewer “elders” than in many other movements, because early deaths and early “burnouts” are so much more common.

    I thought i had a point there, but i think i ended up just rambling… anyway, a topic i need to do some more thinking about…

Comments are closed.