<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh Damn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202551</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202551</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I’m not sure why this is relevant, here (especially) or elsewhere.&lt;/em&gt;

I link, you decide.

&lt;em&gt;Considering that Cindy McCain’s history of drug addiction is old, old news, I suspect that Gosinski (spelling?) is a fake “whistleblower” employed by the McCain campaign to divert current and future media attention away from Sarah Palin’s performance in her series of interviews with Charlie Gibson of ABC.&lt;/em&gt;

Ha!  I&#039;m not much of a conspiracy theorist, but I&#039;ll keep you in mind.  If you&#039;re right I totally owe you twenty bucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I’m not sure why this is relevant, here (especially) or elsewhere.</em></p>
<p>I link, you decide.</p>
<p><em>Considering that Cindy McCain’s history of drug addiction is old, old news, I suspect that Gosinski (spelling?) is a fake “whistleblower” employed by the McCain campaign to divert current and future media attention away from Sarah Palin’s performance in her series of interviews with Charlie Gibson of ABC.</em></p>
<p>Ha!  I&#8217;m not much of a conspiracy theorist, but I&#8217;ll keep you in mind.  If you&#8217;re right I totally owe you twenty bucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: octogalore</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202453</link>
		<dc:creator>octogalore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202453</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why this is relevant, here (especially) or elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why this is relevant, here (especially) or elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElleBeMe</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202355</link>
		<dc:creator>ElleBeMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202355</guid>
		<description>Poeschl - you echo my sentiments exactly.  when I heard about this this morning on the news, I immediately suspected something was up.  The obama campaign has nothing to gain from this.  Considering Obama has not even given any lip service to the Palin Teen pregnancy, he would be even more loathe to touch this.

I smell a rat and I don&#039;t think it is coming from the Obama camp.  And I can also see McCain throwing his wife under the bus to generate press for himself, at the expense of imagined persecution from the other side.

I&#039;m glad I wasn&#039;t the only one who thought this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poeschl &#8211; you echo my sentiments exactly.  when I heard about this this morning on the news, I immediately suspected something was up.  The obama campaign has nothing to gain from this.  Considering Obama has not even given any lip service to the Palin Teen pregnancy, he would be even more loathe to touch this.</p>
<p>I smell a rat and I don&#8217;t think it is coming from the Obama camp.  And I can also see McCain throwing his wife under the bus to generate press for himself, at the expense of imagined persecution from the other side.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I wasn&#8217;t the only one who thought this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poeschl</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202351</link>
		<dc:creator>Poeschl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202351</guid>
		<description>Considering that Cindy McCain&#039;s history of drug addiction is old, old news, I suspect that Gosinski (spelling?) is a fake &quot;whistleblower&quot; employed by the McCain campaign to divert current and future media attention away from Sarah Palin&#039;s performance in her series of interviews with Charlie Gibson of ABC.

Palin&#039;s performance in the initial interview with Gibson was appalling and undermines her claim to be &quot;ready to serve.&quot;  Given that Palin&#039;s performance might not improve in future interviews, the McCain campaign would probably want to divert media attention away from the remaining interviews.  I suspect Gosinski&#039;s &quot;revelations&quot; were planted by the McCain campaign and represent the first of many attempts to distract media attention away from Palin&#039;s poor performance.

By the time my comment clears moderation, the regular Feministe commenters might have already noted this, but I wanted to call attention to it just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that Cindy McCain&#8217;s history of drug addiction is old, old news, I suspect that Gosinski (spelling?) is a fake &#8220;whistleblower&#8221; employed by the McCain campaign to divert current and future media attention away from Sarah Palin&#8217;s performance in her series of interviews with Charlie Gibson of ABC.</p>
<p>Palin&#8217;s performance in the initial interview with Gibson was appalling and undermines her claim to be &#8220;ready to serve.&#8221;  Given that Palin&#8217;s performance might not improve in future interviews, the McCain campaign would probably want to divert media attention away from the remaining interviews.  I suspect Gosinski&#8217;s &#8220;revelations&#8221; were planted by the McCain campaign and represent the first of many attempts to distract media attention away from Palin&#8217;s poor performance.</p>
<p>By the time my comment clears moderation, the regular Feministe commenters might have already noted this, but I wanted to call attention to it just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesurgislac</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesurgislac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202342</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Breaking: Read this.

UPDATE: Background from this 1994 article.&lt;/i&gt;

What? Why should I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Breaking: Read this.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Background from this 1994 article.</i></p>
<p>What? Why should I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofingbird</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202335</link>
		<dc:creator>roofingbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202335</guid>
		<description>1992-1994 I sort of remember talk like this. Isn&#039;t a little strange to be coming up again about a person who is not running for office? Isn&#039;t this a lot like a Clinton death list or Vince Foster? The guy &quot;waits&quot; for 15 years to discuss it, even when I see googles that lead me to believe this story has been floating along for a while? I don&#039;t care how much truth is in this story, It&#039;s crap. It&#039;s just meant to do what the other stories did to Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1992-1994 I sort of remember talk like this. Isn&#8217;t a little strange to be coming up again about a person who is not running for office? Isn&#8217;t this a lot like a Clinton death list or Vince Foster? The guy &#8220;waits&#8221; for 15 years to discuss it, even when I see googles that lead me to believe this story has been floating along for a while? I don&#8217;t care how much truth is in this story, It&#8217;s crap. It&#8217;s just meant to do what the other stories did to Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202327</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202327</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s relevant if he used *state funding and force* to provide the enabling cover.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know it is, I just don&#039;t like that it has to be. Its an election year and all, but I still have trouble not feeling a lot of empathy for Cindy McCain. Its like the whole thing with Bristol: I know its relevant, I just really wish there was another way. At the end of the day John McCain is running for president and his past actions need to be closely, brutally, unflinchingly scrutinized. The stakes are high and we can&#039;t afford to shy away from uncomfortable things. Just because I recognize that doesn&#039;t mean I can&#039;t have empathy for the collateral damage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s relevant if he used *state funding and force* to provide the enabling cover.</p></blockquote>
<p>I know it is, I just don&#8217;t like that it has to be. Its an election year and all, but I still have trouble not feeling a lot of empathy for Cindy McCain. Its like the whole thing with Bristol: I know its relevant, I just really wish there was another way. At the end of the day John McCain is running for president and his past actions need to be closely, brutally, unflinchingly scrutinized. The stakes are high and we can&#8217;t afford to shy away from uncomfortable things. Just because I recognize that doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t have empathy for the collateral damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Dagger Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202303</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Dagger Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202303</guid>
		<description>The most recent New Yorker has an article on Cindy McCain by Ariel Levy that covers a lot of this territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most recent New Yorker has an article on Cindy McCain by Ariel Levy that covers a lot of this territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202300</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202300</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a public matter because it means that John McCain covered up a potentially deadly prescription drug addiction that his wife had in order to keep his political career afloat. It&#039;s a public matter because this man wants to run our country. If he could put his wife through this amount of secrecy - AND THEN LIE ABOUT IT MULTIPLE TIMES - then why would we want him to be our president?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a public matter because it means that John McCain covered up a potentially deadly prescription drug addiction that his wife had in order to keep his political career afloat. It&#8217;s a public matter because this man wants to run our country. If he could put his wife through this amount of secrecy &#8211; AND THEN LIE ABOUT IT MULTIPLE TIMES &#8211; then why would we want him to be our president?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/09/11/oh-damn/#comment-202296</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8500#comment-202296</guid>
		<description>Oh my god, can&#039;t you see this is a private family matter? How can these immoral journalists go poking around in people&#039;s family business? It&#039;s positively Republican, I mean, Unrepublican!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god, can&#8217;t you see this is a private family matter? How can these immoral journalists go poking around in people&#8217;s family business? It&#8217;s positively Republican, I mean, Unrepublican!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.064 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 02:24:14 -->
