Comments on: Is Sarah Palin qualified to be VP? Vote now.

By: Syuda

Syuda — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:06:34 +0000

Shela,

Honey, you were better off not commenting about Susan’s spelling. I found about three mispelled words in your comment. Maybe you are jealous of Susan because she raised some valid points. She was voicing her opinion which is the whole point of this blog anyway. In my “opinion” Sarah Palin is definately not qualified to be VP. She has a lot going on in her family life, and I don’t believe she is in the position to run the country if Mr. McCain was to drop dead. Besides, I’m Democrat!

By: Jill

Jill — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:18:23 +0000

Greatest. Comment. Ever.

If only the rest of us could be as bright as Shela and “Katie Kuric.”

By: Shela

Shela — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:14:35 +0000

Are you all jealous of this woman or something? I think my IQ just dropped 30 points reading your comments, especially yours Susan. Are your drunk?Because you can’t spell. Her last name is Palin, not Plain. The saying is let alone, not “left alone” and way out of her leauge, not “lead”.. WOW.. Any way I love her… She holds others accountible for their actions, starting with her own family. She was just being polite to Katie Kuric, the truth is the morning after pill is abortion, aka murder…. Go Palin!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: kate

kate — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:54:46 +0000

I voted three or four times, you know, just to make sure. Absentee votes for my family.

By: Judith Jewcakes

Judith Jewcakes — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:47:27 +0000

Something smells fishy about this. First, that you can vote as often as you like, and also that so far nobody seems to be on the fence. Usually, no matter how miserable a candidate is, somebody’s on the fence…

Well, I voted HELL NO, anyway.

By: William

William — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:12:17 +0000

…but Natalia…she can see Russia from her house!

By: Natalia

Natalia — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:38:03 +0000

The fact that we must even ask this question means that this entire election has pretty much become a very long David Lynch movie.

(And the answer is no. She isn’t. I know twenty-somethings with more foreign policy experience.)

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:14:47 +0000

What I’m kinda wondering is why is NOW on PBS. Or is it PBS on NOW…err what?

Really, really kinda dumb web page in addition to the poll.

By: anon

anon — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:52:20 +0000

This is stupid. It wouldn’t matter if she had 50 years political experience. Her positions and her ethics are completely unacceptable, full stop.

By: Erica

Erica — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:46:15 +0000

Ehhhh... technically she's qualified. My crazy aunt is qualified. My dimwit mechanic is qualified. That creepy guy on the corner who doesn't shower and yells about THE END BEING NEAR, he's qualified. To serve as VP, you have to be a natural-born citizen, 35 or older, and lived in the US for at least 14 years, just the same as the qualifications for president. There's a difference between "qualified" and "good idea" :P Hell, I'm disqualified, being only 30, but I'd still be a better candidate.