<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecticut Same-Sex Couples Have a Right to Marry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraB</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206762</link>
		<dc:creator>LauraB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206762</guid>
		<description>yay, my state does something right for once!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yay, my state does something right for once!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoRo</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206724</link>
		<dc:creator>RoRo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206724</guid>
		<description>Yay for CT!

I&#039;ve got to reiterate what Alyssa said about California though.  The atmosphere has turned for Prop 8, and I&#039;m really scared it&#039;s going to pass. They&#039;re flooding the waves with commercials saying that if gays get to marry, they&#039;ll tell your 6 year olds about gay marriage in school, that churches will lose their tax status, that you&#039;ll have to explain all of this gayness to your young kids, all this bullshit.  The big problem is that it&#039;s working.  

I&#039;m trying to think of strategies to get out the message that all this is just crap, and I&#039;ve given to No on 8 a few times now, but I just feel like I don&#039;t know what else to do.  I was trying to think like the scaries on the right, and how they do their advertising, maybe demonize the Mormons from Utah who are paying for the ads? (They are, by and large.) Something like, &quot;Maybe in Utah they are willing to take away rights from millions of loving couples just to save the bother of actually talking with their kids, but not in California.  We all know that in Utah most people want the church running the government, but in California we want churches and government safe from each other&#039;s influence. And I know in California we understand that there is no logical connection between civil marriages and church tax status.  Let&#039;s have California make it&#039;s own decisions, and not let our freedoms be bought by the religious right in Utah.&quot;  I don&#039;t know. What do you think? Too dirty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay for CT!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to reiterate what Alyssa said about California though.  The atmosphere has turned for Prop 8, and I&#8217;m really scared it&#8217;s going to pass. They&#8217;re flooding the waves with commercials saying that if gays get to marry, they&#8217;ll tell your 6 year olds about gay marriage in school, that churches will lose their tax status, that you&#8217;ll have to explain all of this gayness to your young kids, all this bullshit.  The big problem is that it&#8217;s working.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to think of strategies to get out the message that all this is just crap, and I&#8217;ve given to No on 8 a few times now, but I just feel like I don&#8217;t know what else to do.  I was trying to think like the scaries on the right, and how they do their advertising, maybe demonize the Mormons from Utah who are paying for the ads? (They are, by and large.) Something like, &#8220;Maybe in Utah they are willing to take away rights from millions of loving couples just to save the bother of actually talking with their kids, but not in California.  We all know that in Utah most people want the church running the government, but in California we want churches and government safe from each other&#8217;s influence. And I know in California we understand that there is no logical connection between civil marriages and church tax status.  Let&#8217;s have California make it&#8217;s own decisions, and not let our freedoms be bought by the religious right in Utah.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t know. What do you think? Too dirty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206708</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206708</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope it remains 3 47 to go. California has a proposition on the ballot to repeal the gay marriage law (Prop 8).  Being that I&#039;ve heard a lot of protests for Prop 8 and very little against it, we could very well lose our legal gay marriages here in CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope it remains 3 47 to go. California has a proposition on the ballot to repeal the gay marriage law (Prop 8).  Being that I&#8217;ve heard a lot of protests for Prop 8 and very little against it, we could very well lose our legal gay marriages here in CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206648</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206648</guid>
		<description>Woohoo! Go CT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo! Go CT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206638</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206638</guid>
		<description>*dances*

FashionablyEvil: Yeah, if it&#039;s challenged it&#039;s gonna be struck down if there&#039;s any justice (as in abstract concept, not as in judge) in the world. It&#039;s really blatantly unconstitutional. How it works, though, is that it&#039;s got to be challenged. I want it to be challenged because it is going &lt;i&gt;down&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*dances*</p>
<p>FashionablyEvil: Yeah, if it&#8217;s challenged it&#8217;s gonna be struck down if there&#8217;s any justice (as in abstract concept, not as in judge) in the world. It&#8217;s really blatantly unconstitutional. How it works, though, is that it&#8217;s got to be challenged. I want it to be challenged because it is going <i>down</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206633</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206633</guid>
		<description>This is awesome.  Well done Connecticut!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome.  Well done Connecticut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FashionablyEvil</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206627</link>
		<dc:creator>FashionablyEvil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206627</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anybody want to guess when there will be a U.S. Supreme Court challenge about the full faith and credit issue in the constitution?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve never been able to figure this one out--I&#039;m not a lawyer, but it always seemed to me that DOMA was unconstitutional as written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anybody want to guess when there will be a U.S. Supreme Court challenge about the full faith and credit issue in the constitution?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been able to figure this one out&#8211;I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but it always seemed to me that DOMA was unconstitutional as written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206626</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206626</guid>
		<description>OMFG.
That&#039;s so awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMFG.<br />
That&#8217;s so awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206623</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206623</guid>
		<description>*Happy dance*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Happy dance*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBrachyrhynchos</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/10/10/connecticut-same-sex-couples-have-a-right-to-marry/#comment-206621</link>
		<dc:creator>CBrachyrhynchos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=8977#comment-206621</guid>
		<description>To be blunt, I don&#039;t really buy the whole &quot;backlash&quot; theory regarding the relationship between moves towards gay marriage and votes. Republicans started making this issue a litmus test for state legislators after Hawaii.  They passed laws in state after state pushing the envelope, then moved for state constitutional referendums to solidify existing statutory language. The &quot;scary events&quot; that are at the core of the &quot;backlash&quot; theory of 2004 happened a full year before the general election. Showing that there really isn&#039;t a &quot;convenient season.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be blunt, I don&#8217;t really buy the whole &#8220;backlash&#8221; theory regarding the relationship between moves towards gay marriage and votes. Republicans started making this issue a litmus test for state legislators after Hawaii.  They passed laws in state after state pushing the envelope, then moved for state constitutional referendums to solidify existing statutory language. The &#8220;scary events&#8221; that are at the core of the &#8220;backlash&#8221; theory of 2004 happened a full year before the general election. Showing that there really isn&#8217;t a &#8220;convenient season.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.032 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 09:39:50 -->
