<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Pro-Lifers&#8221; Oppose Measures That Decrease the Abortion Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike b.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-244137</link>
		<dc:creator>mike b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-244137</guid>
		<description>john,

Have you looked at any other features of law in the Netherlands besides abortion restrictions? They do a much better job than the U.S. at providing access to health care and social services of the kind proven to reduce abortions. 

And welfare does work for most of the people who need it. Your average welfare recipient is white, is on welfare for less than 2 years, and never returns to the welfare rolls, though you almost never hear any of this mentioned. If we really want to reduce abortions in this country, the best place to start is with a universal single payer health care plan. National health care and effective sex education are the primary reasons European countries, including the Netherlands, have much lower rates of abortion, unintended pregnancy and teen pregnancy than the U.S. As long as we keep health care a priviledge and rely on abstinence only models of sex &quot;education,&quot; we are going to continue to experience much higher rates in these categories than Europe, whether we further restrict abortion or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john,</p>
<p>Have you looked at any other features of law in the Netherlands besides abortion restrictions? They do a much better job than the U.S. at providing access to health care and social services of the kind proven to reduce abortions. </p>
<p>And welfare does work for most of the people who need it. Your average welfare recipient is white, is on welfare for less than 2 years, and never returns to the welfare rolls, though you almost never hear any of this mentioned. If we really want to reduce abortions in this country, the best place to start is with a universal single payer health care plan. National health care and effective sex education are the primary reasons European countries, including the Netherlands, have much lower rates of abortion, unintended pregnancy and teen pregnancy than the U.S. As long as we keep health care a priviledge and rely on abstinence only models of sex &#8220;education,&#8221; we are going to continue to experience much higher rates in these categories than Europe, whether we further restrict abortion or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john umland</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211586</link>
		<dc:creator>john umland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211586</guid>
		<description>Hello, a friend on Facebook likes to link to your articles so I thought I&#039;d drop a comment here. It doesn&#039;t seem contrary opinions are well received here, but I will try to offer contrary data, analysis, and historical perspective, nothing personal.

I looked at the National Right to Life link. They list the 23% category as &quot;feels&quot; unable to afford a baby. Pro-life clinics usually are able to show or find or produce the essentials to afford a baby. CareNet is one group I am familiar with. Charities are often helpful as well as WIC. Adoption is another method to address concerns of affordability. Since the mother considering abortion does not want the child anyway, perhaps adoption will not be difficult. When the baby is handed over, affordability as an issue goes away.

The Catholics in Alliance study has questionable conclusions from their data. One critical response can be found by Michael New PhD at http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.30_New_Michael%20J._Does%20Increased%20Welfare%20Spending%20or%20Pro-Life%20Legislation%20Reduce%20Abortion%253F_.xml

According the the Guttmacher Institute, the Netherlands has the lowest abortion rate in Europe, yet it&#039;s legal restrictions might not be attractive to the writers of this blog. I would welcome the restrictions the Netherlands has in our own country. See a wiki entry on Netherlands abortion laws. Regarding improved social services in our own country, we tried that for 40 years, it was called welfare. Ironically, it was Bill Clinton who eliminated welfare as we knew it in the 90&#039;s yet still claims abortion rates fell under his administration. They fell under Bush&#039;s as well. So bringing back welfare as we knew it then might not be the answer to the problems. 

God is good
jpu

In the meantime, we still feel that babies in the utero should have the same human rights the out of womb babies have and their mothers, which is why, there is little satisfaction on our side until those babies have those rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, a friend on Facebook likes to link to your articles so I thought I&#8217;d drop a comment here. It doesn&#8217;t seem contrary opinions are well received here, but I will try to offer contrary data, analysis, and historical perspective, nothing personal.</p>
<p>I looked at the National Right to Life link. They list the 23% category as &#8220;feels&#8221; unable to afford a baby. Pro-life clinics usually are able to show or find or produce the essentials to afford a baby. CareNet is one group I am familiar with. Charities are often helpful as well as WIC. Adoption is another method to address concerns of affordability. Since the mother considering abortion does not want the child anyway, perhaps adoption will not be difficult. When the baby is handed over, affordability as an issue goes away.</p>
<p>The Catholics in Alliance study has questionable conclusions from their data. One critical response can be found by Michael New PhD at <a href="http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.30_New_Michael%20J._Does%20Increased%20Welfare%20Spending%20or%20Pro-Life%20Legislation%20Reduce%20Abortion%253F_.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.30_New_Michael%20J._Does%20Increased%20Welfare%20Spending%20or%20Pro-Life%20Legislation%20Reduce%20Abortion%253F_.xml</a></p>
<p>According the the Guttmacher Institute, the Netherlands has the lowest abortion rate in Europe, yet it&#8217;s legal restrictions might not be attractive to the writers of this blog. I would welcome the restrictions the Netherlands has in our own country. See a wiki entry on Netherlands abortion laws. Regarding improved social services in our own country, we tried that for 40 years, it was called welfare. Ironically, it was Bill Clinton who eliminated welfare as we knew it in the 90&#8217;s yet still claims abortion rates fell under his administration. They fell under Bush&#8217;s as well. So bringing back welfare as we knew it then might not be the answer to the problems. </p>
<p>God is good<br />
jpu</p>
<p>In the meantime, we still feel that babies in the utero should have the same human rights the out of womb babies have and their mothers, which is why, there is little satisfaction on our side until those babies have those rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211499</guid>
		<description>holy crap, I take a break from feministe for a few days (what can I say, I have to actually work every now and then), come back, and it&#039;s trollville!

Thanks for detailing all tis Jill, and I too am incredibly glad to see some of the (actual) pro-life people seeing the light.

And I&#039;ll try to comment more often to help swing the human being to troll ratio back in your favor :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy crap, I take a break from feministe for a few days (what can I say, I have to actually work every now and then), come back, and it&#8217;s trollville!</p>
<p>Thanks for detailing all tis Jill, and I too am incredibly glad to see some of the (actual) pro-life people seeing the light.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll try to comment more often to help swing the human being to troll ratio back in your favor :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211489</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211489</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks Katha, I didn&#039;t know that. I&#039;ll update that in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks Katha, I didn&#8217;t know that. I&#8217;ll update that in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opportunities</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211441</link>
		<dc:creator>Opportunities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211441</guid>
		<description>Katha is right, Rosa is a pro-choice leader with long record or supporting reproductive rights.  

I think this article and Rosa&#039;s leadership point to an opportunity to work with strange bed-fellows to get some things accomplished.  We should take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katha is right, Rosa is a pro-choice leader with long record or supporting reproductive rights.  </p>
<p>I think this article and Rosa&#8217;s leadership point to an opportunity to work with strange bed-fellows to get some things accomplished.  We should take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211423</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211423</guid>
		<description>Why do anti-choicers think they have to educate pro-choicers about the birds and the bees?  Oooooh, you mean penis+vagina sometimes = pregnancy!?  God damn.

I am sick and tired of the anti-choice lobby insisting that pro-choicers must &quot;compromise&quot; and work towards our alleged common goals.  WE are the ones who support comprehensive sex-ed, readily available birth control, structural support for mothers, more accessible pre-natal and maternal healthcare, etc. etc.  NONE of this country&#039;s &quot;pro-life&quot; groups do.  But like Joan admitted, &quot;pro-lifers&quot; don&#039;t actually give a shit about people&#039;s lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do anti-choicers think they have to educate pro-choicers about the birds and the bees?  Oooooh, you mean penis+vagina sometimes = pregnancy!?  God damn.</p>
<p>I am sick and tired of the anti-choice lobby insisting that pro-choicers must &#8220;compromise&#8221; and work towards our alleged common goals.  WE are the ones who support comprehensive sex-ed, readily available birth control, structural support for mothers, more accessible pre-natal and maternal healthcare, etc. etc.  NONE of this country&#8217;s &#8220;pro-life&#8221; groups do.  But like Joan admitted, &#8220;pro-lifers&#8221; don&#8217;t actually give a shit about people&#8217;s lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katha Pollitt</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211415</link>
		<dc:creator>Katha Pollitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211415</guid>
		<description>Rosa DeLauro is pro-choice. the Washington Post story, which you rely on, got it wrong.
Check out her voting record here:
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Rosa_DeLauro_Abortion.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosa DeLauro is pro-choice. the Washington Post story, which you rely on, got it wrong.<br />
Check out her voting record here:<br />
<a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Rosa_DeLauro_Abortion.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Rosa_DeLauro_Abortion.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoyden About Town</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211365</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoyden About Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211365</guid>
		<description>[...] options and providing public financial support for young families and single mothers, even though as Jill writes today in an excellent post, an increasing number of moderates have realised that such programs do indeed decrease actual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] options and providing public financial support for young families and single mothers, even though as Jill writes today in an excellent post, an increasing number of moderates have realised that such programs do indeed decrease actual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211356</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211356</guid>
		<description>The problem that I have with people like Joan saying that a fetus didn&#039;t get the choice to live or die when a woman decides to abort, is that she is assuming that the woman in question had the choice to get pregnant or not.  Living in a well developed country as we do, having access to contraceptives, having education about how not to get pregnant and having a voice in our sexual lives is a privilige.  What about women who live in places where they don&#039;t have access to education (girls are the least likely to attend schools in numerous regions of our world).  Those women don&#039;t have access to or are prevented from taking contraceptives.  They don&#039;t get a say about when or whether their &#039;husband (who might have several other wives) has sex with them....and if they say no, they risk the consequences of domestic violence, which is sometimes sanctioned in many cultures - or at the very least silently accepted.  And asking their husband to wear a condom is tantamount to admitting that you may have HIV/AIDS (because why else would you need a condom?) The number of times I have heard people say that women in developing countries should stop having babies - it will help poverty rates, reduce HIV/AIDS, increase education, access to health care......
After I lived in an African country for 2 years and worked very closely with a community of women, I am only too aware of the options these women have......almost none.  

So I have a question for Joan.  Supposing you, Joan, are HIV positive, have 6 children (none of whom are in school...maybe some are sick, and certainly all are undernourished andhungry), are HIV positive, lived in a mud cave (you can hardly call those houses), your &#039;husband&#039; has three other &#039;wives&#039;, and beats you every other night before essentially raping you (but you can&#039;t complain because according to the law in your country, husbands own their wives so it isn&#039;t rape), and you are now pregnant.  Just think about what that would be like, and what that life is like for millions of women around the world.  Wouldn&#039;t YOU want an abortion???  And while we are at it...let&#039;s just say for arguments sake, that the fetus did get a choice.  What do you think it would say???? (I can just hear it now telling me that it can&#039;t wait to be born into that life full of promise and opportunity - I hope that you are detecting my sarcasm).

Personally (as in ME), I don&#039;t believe in abortion...but I ABHOR people who think that THEY have the right to tell ME what to do with my body.  And telling women who had no control over their circumstances that an abortion is wrong.  Who do they think they are???  Why aren&#039;t you speaking out against all the other things that really ARE wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem that I have with people like Joan saying that a fetus didn&#8217;t get the choice to live or die when a woman decides to abort, is that she is assuming that the woman in question had the choice to get pregnant or not.  Living in a well developed country as we do, having access to contraceptives, having education about how not to get pregnant and having a voice in our sexual lives is a privilige.  What about women who live in places where they don&#8217;t have access to education (girls are the least likely to attend schools in numerous regions of our world).  Those women don&#8217;t have access to or are prevented from taking contraceptives.  They don&#8217;t get a say about when or whether their &#8216;husband (who might have several other wives) has sex with them&#8230;.and if they say no, they risk the consequences of domestic violence, which is sometimes sanctioned in many cultures &#8211; or at the very least silently accepted.  And asking their husband to wear a condom is tantamount to admitting that you may have HIV/AIDS (because why else would you need a condom?) The number of times I have heard people say that women in developing countries should stop having babies &#8211; it will help poverty rates, reduce HIV/AIDS, increase education, access to health care&#8230;&#8230;<br />
After I lived in an African country for 2 years and worked very closely with a community of women, I am only too aware of the options these women have&#8230;&#8230;almost none.  </p>
<p>So I have a question for Joan.  Supposing you, Joan, are HIV positive, have 6 children (none of whom are in school&#8230;maybe some are sick, and certainly all are undernourished andhungry), are HIV positive, lived in a mud cave (you can hardly call those houses), your &#8216;husband&#8217; has three other &#8216;wives&#8217;, and beats you every other night before essentially raping you (but you can&#8217;t complain because according to the law in your country, husbands own their wives so it isn&#8217;t rape), and you are now pregnant.  Just think about what that would be like, and what that life is like for millions of women around the world.  Wouldn&#8217;t YOU want an abortion???  And while we are at it&#8230;let&#8217;s just say for arguments sake, that the fetus did get a choice.  What do you think it would say???? (I can just hear it now telling me that it can&#8217;t wait to be born into that life full of promise and opportunity &#8211; I hope that you are detecting my sarcasm).</p>
<p>Personally (as in ME), I don&#8217;t believe in abortion&#8230;but I ABHOR people who think that THEY have the right to tell ME what to do with my body.  And telling women who had no control over their circumstances that an abortion is wrong.  Who do they think they are???  Why aren&#8217;t you speaking out against all the other things that really ARE wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapetum</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/18/pro-lifers-oppose-measures-that-decrease-the-abortion-rate/#comment-211353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapetum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9704#comment-211353</guid>
		<description>Wow! Joan lives in a world where rape and coercion don&#039;t exist, accidents don&#039;t happen, and everyone has all the knowledge, power and access to stuff they need to avoid pregnancies at all times - and people&#039;s circumstances never change drastically once they&#039;ve had sex! How can I move there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Joan lives in a world where rape and coercion don&#8217;t exist, accidents don&#8217;t happen, and everyone has all the knowledge, power and access to stuff they need to avoid pregnancies at all times &#8211; and people&#8217;s circumstances never change drastically once they&#8217;ve had sex! How can I move there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
