Author: Cara has written 429 posts for this blog.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

13 Responses

  1. 1
    Nia 11.22.2008 at 3:35 pm |

    I see this add as a lost opportunity to criticise ogling and street harassment. Imagine a very attractive woman in the place of the candy and a man in the place of the woman.

    But I guess that any critique of objectifying women is something that the advertising industry couldn’t do without exploding.

  2. 2
    greg 11.22.2008 at 7:55 pm |

    Yes, the ad is offensive, not only in its choice of representing the “losing one’s head” aspect. Put in any combination of characters – a gay man checking out another guy, or a man and a woman, or vice versa, or a woman checking out shoes or a man checking out a football match, or me distracted by stall selling used books. There is no good way to represent the ad’s sentiment using this arrangement of characters without exploiting some sterotypical image or being found offensive to someone. The message could still be delivered but the sentiment used to deliver it would have to be different. Overall, a poor decision by the advertising agency that made it. (later on when I find it I’ll send a Dutch ad to be picked apart – one that I like, both for message and presentation, but I would find your opinions interresting).

  3. 3
    elbu 11.22.2008 at 9:25 pm |

    just – kudos for this post.

  4. 4
    Bagelsan 11.22.2008 at 10:39 pm |

    At first glance that ad creeped me out ’cause I thought the kid had a head on a string that he was dragging along with his candy, and I was like “Halloween is officially *messed up* now! Geez!” And the bag of candy kinda looked like guts or something… maybe I’m just morbid.

    Now that I see what’s *actually* going on it’s still creepy. I agree with greg; it seems impossible to represent this “adult-so-distracted-by-X-they-lose-their-head” idea without relying entirely on stereotypes, which is pretty much inescapably bad. It’s fat-shaming with a massive dose of “she was asking for it” while simultaneously failing to inform about ID-theft. …So just a lose-lose, really.

  5. 5
    Bagelsan 11.22.2008 at 10:41 pm |

    I see this add as a lost opportunity to criticise ogling and street harassment. Imagine a very attractive woman in the place of the candy and a man in the place of the woman.

    But then it would be the woman’s fault the guy’s ID was stolen. Duh. ;p

  6. 6
    denelian 11.22.2008 at 11:57 pm |

    um…. WHAT??

    seriously? who the hell that this ad was a good idea? the only thing *I* am getting out of the ad (without the knowledge given by the critique) is that young children are a menace who behead overweight older women with purported bags of candy. from the print, i don’t even SEE a connection to identity theft! yes, the explanation makes it makes sense, but without it the scene is just… macabre.

    plus its fucking insulting. the people who designed this ad went out if their way to make the woman as unattractive as possible and then punished her for not living up to THEIR standards of beauty. i had advertising…

  7. 7
    denelian 11.22.2008 at 11:58 pm |

    erm.. that is, i HATE advertising. sorry.

  8. 8

    [...] Feministe » Well Maybe Your Identity Wouldn’t Have Gotten Stolen if You Weren’t So Fat "I for one am really fucking tired of seeing women (and people of all genders, but women get it the worst) devalued based on their weight, and fat being used as the butt of a joke — particularly in ways that portray overweight people as stupid, childish, inherently unhealthy and obsessed with food. It’s not funny, it’s demeaning and it’s bullshit. [...]

  9. 9

    [...] Well Maybe Your Identity Wouldn’t Have Gotten Stolen if You Weren … By Feministe ,November 23, 2008 This photograph of an ad in a Netherlands train station was snapped by a Shapely Prose reader. It’s an ad for identity theft prevention — in short, … [...]

  10. 10
    SLiver of Jade 11.24.2008 at 1:02 pm |

    And to top it all off, the ad itself isn’t even helpful! The PIN is of no use to someone who doesn’t already have your bank card and/or account number. Unless things are entirely different over in the Netherlands, or I have some crazy bank that requires a PIN to verify the information you just provided.

  11. 11
    MsM 11.24.2008 at 1:44 pm |

    I’d bet a whole lot of money there’s one of a young dude losing his head over a hot, barely dressed woman.

    Bingo!

    Sliver, it’s not, but you’re right. It tries to make the point the you should screen your PIN so that subsequent copying or stealing the card is useless, but erm… well, I don’t see it either. I just see awful.

  12. 12
    rachel 11.25.2008 at 3:46 pm |

    glad you put that last bit up about the “it’s unhealthy!!!” whiners. um…so you say it is unhealthy…why does that give you the right to hate people? is what i would say to them.

  13. 13
    jennny 11.30.2008 at 4:22 pm |

    Ugh, what an awful ad… Completely sickening. Honestly if you hadn’t explained the ad, I would have been like wtf is this crazy ad even selling… identify theft? a bit of a stretch.

Comments are closed.